09-25-2017, 05:41 PM
A) Congratulations to cornfed, for not just keeping the faith, but for having an uncannily accurate prediction in a game where Stanford's offense beat the most optimistic projections.
B) Shame upon winflop, qwerty (twice!), myself, TC (AKA Phogge), CTCard, bbm233, trevmiesterj who picked Stanford to lose and were wrong. Kudos to Mick, who picked Stanford to lose (correctly as it happened) last time, and then to win (again, correctly) this time. From now on, he is only allowed to pick wins.
C) Of special note, Phogge got the score almost perfectly right... just got the teams bass-ackwards. 31-55 instead of 58-34.
Thanks everyone for participating. I will work with BigEasyCard to get the cumulative rankings out later this week.
BC
P.S. A couple people entered twice. That's not a problem if the same score was already entered, but a potential problem if two different scores were selected. Although I am sure these were inadvertent, to prevent attempts at manipulating the system, I suggest we take the less accurate one.
B) Shame upon winflop, qwerty (twice!), myself, TC (AKA Phogge), CTCard, bbm233, trevmiesterj who picked Stanford to lose and were wrong. Kudos to Mick, who picked Stanford to lose (correctly as it happened) last time, and then to win (again, correctly) this time. From now on, he is only allowed to pick wins.
C) Of special note, Phogge got the score almost perfectly right... just got the teams bass-ackwards. 31-55 instead of 58-34.
Thanks everyone for participating. I will work with BigEasyCard to get the cumulative rankings out later this week.
BC
P.S. A couple people entered twice. That's not a problem if the same score was already entered, but a potential problem if two different scores were selected. Although I am sure these were inadvertent, to prevent attempts at manipulating the system, I suggest we take the less accurate one.
