11-11-2017, 01:06 PM
(11-11-2017, 01:02 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:That makes sense, I figured 2009 would have to have one or two.
Yeah, Oregon is rated as a 93, so just below my arbitrary cut-off of 94 for honorable mention.
Anyway, I guess my overall points from this exercise are:
1) Stanford's had a lot of great games these past eight years!
2) Last night really was one of the best Stanford performances of this run
3) Still, not the very best and Shaw's bias to postseason performances is perfectly fair
