[stupac2]

[quote author=CTcard link=topic=18293.msg217258#msg217258 date=1512533847]I have to admit I was wondering that as I was writing.

I believe that awhile back, WIM looked at season to season consistency and noted Stanford was not.

I don't believe WiM compared us to other programs, which is really what you want to do. Anyway, giant table incoming, here's every programs' average offensive game efficiency (per BCF Toys, so you have to accept that their method is capturing game efficiency reasonably) and the standard deviation between games. I bolded Stanford so we'd stand out (also I'm going to break this up into two posts, since it exceeded the character limit...):[/quote]

Here's the second half:

Rank	Team	Average Efficiency	Standard Deviation
81	UAB	4.39	11.03
82	Army	12.5	11.02
83	North Carolina State	6.54	10.91
84	Kent State	-14.15	10.9
85	Wyoming	-4.15	10.87
86	Western Kentucky	2.94	10.86
87	Kansas	-9.72	10.84
88	Georgia	11.36	10.82
89	UNLV	5.45	10.8
90	New Mexico State	3	10.76
91	North Texas	7.3	10.76
92	Alabama	10.9	10.74
93	LSU	6.1	10.69
94	Connecticut	-1.25	10.52
95	Kentucky	0.87	10.48
96	Indiana	-2.32	10.33
97	Penn State	11.94	10.29
98	Tennessee	-5.85	10.02
99	Wisconsin	4.83	10.01
100	Nebraska	-1.57	9.99
101	Charlotte	-9.96	9.98
102	Clemson	8.62	9.78
103	SMU	13.52	9.78
104	Coastal Carolina	2.28	9.55
105	Pittsburgh	0.23	9.27
106	South Carolina	1.11	9.25
107	Arizona State	7.61	9.18
108	Rutgers	-7.85	9.14
109	Oregon State	-3.58	9.12
110	UCLA	8.37	9.06
111	Florida State	-2.88	9.01
112	Hawaii	-0.45	8.96
113	Northern Illinois	-1.47	8.94
114	Old Dominion	-4.66	8.92
115	Idaho	-3.49	8.77
116	Oklahoma	21.58	8.55
117	Washington	11.99	8.53
118	UTEP	-8.59	8.51
119	South Alabama	-7.89	8.5
120	Akron	-2.93	8.42
121	Syracuse	-1.33	8.4
122	UTSA	-0.45	8.37
123	San Jose State	-13.76	8.32
124	Texas State	-5.6	8.26
125	Fresno State	1.68	8.24
126	Michigan State	-2.18	7.82
127	Central Florida	17.25	7.28
128	Miami (OH)	1.01	6.47
129	Marshall	1.12	6.14
130	Illinois	-10.42	5.62

[stupac2]

[quote author=CTcard link=topic=18293.msg217258#msg217258 date=1512533847]I have to admit I was wondering that as I was writing.

I believe that awhile back, WIM looked at season to season consistency and noted Stanford was not.

I don't believe WiM compared us to other programs, which is really what you want to do. Anyway, giant table incoming, here's every programs' average offensive game efficiency (per BCF Toys, so you have to accept that their method is capturing game efficiency reasonably) and the standard deviation between games. I bolded Stanford so we'd stand out (also I'm going to break this up into two posts, since it exceeded the character limit...):[/quote]

Here's the second half:

Rank	Team	Average Efficiency	Standard Deviation
81	UAB	4.39	11.03
82	Army	12.5	11.02
83	North Carolina State	6.54	10.91
84	Kent State	-14.15	10.9
85	Wyoming	-4.15	10.87
86	Western Kentucky	2.94	10.86
87	Kansas	-9.72	10.84
88	Georgia	11.36	10.82
89	UNLV	5.45	10.8
90	New Mexico State	3	10.76
91	North Texas	7.3	10.76
92	Alabama	10.9	10.74
93	LSU	6.1	10.69
94	Connecticut	-1.25	10.52
95	Kentucky	0.87	10.48
96	Indiana	-2.32	10.33
97	Penn State	11.94	10.29
98	Tennessee	-5.85	10.02
99	Wisconsin	4.83	10.01
100	Nebraska	-1.57	9.99
101	Charlotte	-9.96	9.98
102	Clemson	8.62	9.78
103	SMU	13.52	9.78
104	Coastal Carolina	2.28	9.55
105	Pittsburgh	0.23	9.27
106	South Carolina	1.11	9.25
107	Arizona State	7.61	9.18
108	Rutgers	-7.85	9.14
109	Oregon State	-3.58	9.12
110	UCLA	8.37	9.06
111	Florida State	-2.88	9.01
112	Hawaii	-0.45	8.96
113	Northern Illinois	-1.47	8.94
114	Old Dominion	-4.66	8.92
115	Idaho	-3.49	8.77
116	Oklahoma	21.58	8.55
117	Washington	11.99	8.53
118	UTEP	-8.59	8.51
119	South Alabama	-7.89	8.5
120	Akron	-2.93	8.42
121	Syracuse	-1.33	8.4
122	UTSA	-0.45	8.37
123	San Jose State	-13.76	8.32
124	Texas State	-5.6	8.26
125	Fresno State	1.68	8.24
126	Michigan State	-2.18	7.82
127	Central Florida	17.25	7.28
128	Miami (OH)	1.01	6.47
129	Marshall	1.12	6.14
130	Illinois	-10.42	5.62