[lex24]

Sure it’s ok to believe it.  I mean  it can ALWAYS be better.  Thing is - it never has been better in our lifetime.  Not even close. That is a fact. The rest is belief.

I'm not following your logic, Red State.  The Stanford D was bad; the O was great; ergo, the Pac 10 was the laughingstock of the country. 
Plus, an undermanned Cardinal team went toe-to-toe with Wisconsin from the Mighty Big 10, and I think the Cardinal wins if McLaughlin and Walters are healthy.

But regardless, I have yet to see why Stanford cannot have a good defense and a dominant pro style offense, circa 1999/2001.  More fundamentally, I don't know why anyone would want Stanford to strive for any other kind of offense.  It's freaking mind-boggling. 

Expand your horizons, Cardinal Fans.  Yes, the team's W/L record has been very good under this regime.  But guess what?  It could have/should have been better.  It's okay to believe that.  Really, it is . . .

[lex24]

Sure it’s ok to believe it.  I mean  it can ALWAYS be better.  Thing is - it never has been better in our lifetime.  Not even close. That is a fact. The rest is belief.

I'm not following your logic, Red State.  The Stanford D was bad; the O was great; ergo, the Pac 10 was the laughingstock of the country. 
Plus, an undermanned Cardinal team went toe-to-toe with Wisconsin from the Mighty Big 10, and I think the Cardinal wins if McLaughlin and Walters are healthy.

But regardless, I have yet to see why Stanford cannot have a good defense and a dominant pro style offense, circa 1999/2001.  More fundamentally, I don't know why anyone would want Stanford to strive for any other kind of offense.  It's freaking mind-boggling. 

Expand your horizons, Cardinal Fans.  Yes, the team's W/L record has been very good under this regime.  But guess what?  It could have/should have been better.  It's okay to believe that.  Really, it is . . .