[CompSci87]

Last eight complete recruiting classes
U$C:  21 five stars, 98 four stars: 119 total
Votre Dame: 9 five stars, 83 hour stars: 92 total
UCLA: 8 five stars, 80 fouir stars: 88 total
Oregon: 4 five stars, 63 four stars: 68 total
Stanford: 8 five stars, 54 four stars: 62 total

Over that same period, our W-L record
vs, U$C: 6-4
vs, Votre Dame: 6-2
vs. UCLA: 9-0
vs. Oregon, 5-3
26 wins, ten losses. 

If we've had 11-2 talent, we need to stop scheduling all these 13-0 teams.

This is great: some facts to help evaluate whether the team is really underperforming its talent, as has been claimed.

Obviously we hope the team will overperform relative to star ratings, with the staff finding guys who are underrated, coaching them up well, taking advantage of the low attrition rate among students who pass Stanford admissions, etc. And because we're fans.

[CompSci87]

Last eight complete recruiting classes
U$C:  21 five stars, 98 four stars: 119 total
Votre Dame: 9 five stars, 83 hour stars: 92 total
UCLA: 8 five stars, 80 fouir stars: 88 total
Oregon: 4 five stars, 63 four stars: 68 total
Stanford: 8 five stars, 54 four stars: 62 total

Over that same period, our W-L record
vs, U$C: 6-4
vs, Votre Dame: 6-2
vs. UCLA: 9-0
vs. Oregon, 5-3
26 wins, ten losses. 

If we've had 11-2 talent, we need to stop scheduling all these 13-0 teams.

This is great: some facts to help evaluate whether the team is really underperforming its talent, as has been claimed.

Obviously we hope the team will overperform relative to star ratings, with the staff finding guys who are underrated, coaching them up well, taking advantage of the low attrition rate among students who pass Stanford admissions, etc. And because we're fans.