[CTcard]

Love is 5th in PBUs in the nation, and few teams are throwing his way. 

Love appears to be second in the nation in PBUs, and tied for third in passes defended. 
http://www.cfbstats.com/2018/leader/nati...ort04.html 

The statement above is more or less (though not completely) contradictory. 
It is generally difficult to break up lots of passes when the other team does not throw your way. 

In Stanford's case, Paulson Adebo leads the nation in PBUs, which is at least partly because opposing teams have been throwing away from our other corner, Alijah Holder. 

Yeah Wake scored 27 points, but 14 of those were in garbage time after ND was up 42-13... oh and that was with Wake running 92 plays. They scored 1.93 points per drive. That's a fantastic stat line. Ball St. ran 96 plays and only scored 16 points. 

I did watch the und-Wake game tape. 
The und defense did give up a lot of yards without points, I don't know if that was by design. 
In the first half Wake had a 47 yd drive with a missed FG, a 54 yd drive for a FG, a 75 yd drive for a TD, and a 67 yd drive for a missed FG. 
That's 10 points (and 3 points on a zero yd drive FG), which is pretty good. 
That's also four long drives for 243 yds in a half, which I suspect your coaches were not thrilled about. 
Obviously there were some better notes as well. Several three and out type drives through the first half and third quarter. 

It also could be a concern if you allow a team to run 92 plays to your 76 (Wake); or 97 to your 72 (Ball St). Sometimes you have to be able to get your defense off the field. 
However, that is unlikely to be the pattern against Stanford this year, as Stanford seems to have somehow morphed into a big-play, boom or bust offense and not one that sustains long drives.

[CTcard]

Love is 5th in PBUs in the nation, and few teams are throwing his way. 

Love appears to be second in the nation in PBUs, and tied for third in passes defended. 
http://www.cfbstats.com/2018/leader/nati...ort04.html 

The statement above is more or less (though not completely) contradictory. 
It is generally difficult to break up lots of passes when the other team does not throw your way. 

In Stanford's case, Paulson Adebo leads the nation in PBUs, which is at least partly because opposing teams have been throwing away from our other corner, Alijah Holder. 

Yeah Wake scored 27 points, but 14 of those were in garbage time after ND was up 42-13... oh and that was with Wake running 92 plays. They scored 1.93 points per drive. That's a fantastic stat line. Ball St. ran 96 plays and only scored 16 points. 

I did watch the und-Wake game tape. 
The und defense did give up a lot of yards without points, I don't know if that was by design. 
In the first half Wake had a 47 yd drive with a missed FG, a 54 yd drive for a FG, a 75 yd drive for a TD, and a 67 yd drive for a missed FG. 
That's 10 points (and 3 points on a zero yd drive FG), which is pretty good. 
That's also four long drives for 243 yds in a half, which I suspect your coaches were not thrilled about. 
Obviously there were some better notes as well. Several three and out type drives through the first half and third quarter. 

It also could be a concern if you allow a team to run 92 plays to your 76 (Wake); or 97 to your 72 (Ball St). Sometimes you have to be able to get your defense off the field. 
However, that is unlikely to be the pattern against Stanford this year, as Stanford seems to have somehow morphed into a big-play, boom or bust offense and not one that sustains long drives.