03-19-2019, 09:16 AM
(03-19-2019, 01:44 AM)M T Wrote: While RPI is not a perfect guide, nor is it (obviously!) what the committee uses, it is at least objective.My take on the seeding/RPI disparity is the opposite of yours: rather than the RPI showing that the seeding is inaccurate, I think the seeding confirmsĀ (for the umpteenth time) that the RPI is inaccurate. Kudos to the committee for giving the RPI the weight it deserves. RPI, R.I.P!
