[cardcrimson]

Agreed on both points.

Okay, I see your points. Rudolph had it coming.

So did the school bully that got shot. That provocatively dressed coed deserved to get raped, too.

WTF?

You know it's possible for both players to be in the wrong, for there to be a vast difference in the degree of their transgressions (since it's clear Garret and later Pouncey went nuclear,) and for you to argue without creating a strawman, right?  

To point out what Rudolph did is not to say that he deserved the helmet to the head.  

That rape analogy was in really poor taste, too.  You should be ashamed, dude.

Ashamed? I'm not the one who blamed Rudolph for getting hit in the head with his own helmet. I simply tried to point out how utterly ridiculous that opinion is.

There you go strawman-ing again.

Did not some posters here go so far as to say, "if Randolph hadn't done X Y or Z, Garrett would never had hit him in the head with his helmet"? Sheesh.

[cardcrimson]

Agreed on both points.

Okay, I see your points. Rudolph had it coming.

So did the school bully that got shot. That provocatively dressed coed deserved to get raped, too.

WTF?

You know it's possible for both players to be in the wrong, for there to be a vast difference in the degree of their transgressions (since it's clear Garret and later Pouncey went nuclear,) and for you to argue without creating a strawman, right?  

To point out what Rudolph did is not to say that he deserved the helmet to the head.  

That rape analogy was in really poor taste, too.  You should be ashamed, dude.

Ashamed? I'm not the one who blamed Rudolph for getting hit in the head with his own helmet. I simply tried to point out how utterly ridiculous that opinion is.

There you go strawman-ing again.

Did not some posters here go so far as to say, "if Randolph hadn't done X Y or Z, Garrett would never had hit him in the head with his helmet"? Sheesh.