[burger]

I think the most remarkable stat of the game was the disparity in rebounds: 51 - 31, including a 15-6 disparity in offensive boards.   Put a better way, we captured 15/40 rebounds available on our offensive end (37.5%), which is really good, while holding Oklahoma to 6/42 (14%) of the boards on their offensive end.  To do it without a strong post presence is all the more remarkable.  KUdos to Terry and DaSilva who each had 11 rebounds (double/double for Terry).



BC

I'm not surprised on the rebounding.  What we lack in size we make up for in athleticism.  Every one of our starters is quick and can jump.  Per http://barttorvik.com/team.php?team=Stanford&year=2020 we're 20th in D-I in defensive rebounding %.  The offensive rebounding stats aren't as good but are improving recently, as last night showed.

Butler does not start anyone over 6-9, so we should not be at a disadvantage there.

[burger]

I think the most remarkable stat of the game was the disparity in rebounds: 51 - 31, including a 15-6 disparity in offensive boards.   Put a better way, we captured 15/40 rebounds available on our offensive end (37.5%), which is really good, while holding Oklahoma to 6/42 (14%) of the boards on their offensive end.  To do it without a strong post presence is all the more remarkable.  KUdos to Terry and DaSilva who each had 11 rebounds (double/double for Terry).



BC

I'm not surprised on the rebounding.  What we lack in size we make up for in athleticism.  Every one of our starters is quick and can jump.  Per http://barttorvik.com/team.php?team=Stanford&year=2020 we're 20th in D-I in defensive rebounding %.  The offensive rebounding stats aren't as good but are improving recently, as last night showed.

Butler does not start anyone over 6-9, so we should not be at a disadvantage there.