[teejers1]

However, at this point who knows what happens in the Pac-12 CG.   If UW is not available, why do we assume Pac-12 North #2 or #3 would be the next selection?   If USC and Colorado are both undefeated it might make sense to let them play in the CG if Pac-12 North #1 is unavailable.  It would be tough for undefeated Colorado to not have a chance to be conference champs because USC had COVID tracing issues and didn't play Colorado.

I think even Larry would figure this out.

The better question is should UW get to play in the CCG, even if it is available?  

There are no meaningful rules this season (beyond Covid protocols), so the N/S distinction means nothing.  
If there are two undefeated teams in conference, then let them have at it, geography be damned.  Neither UW (who lost to Stanford) nor anyone else in the north would be in much of a position to complain.

[teejers1]

However, at this point who knows what happens in the Pac-12 CG.   If UW is not available, why do we assume Pac-12 North #2 or #3 would be the next selection?   If USC and Colorado are both undefeated it might make sense to let them play in the CG if Pac-12 North #1 is unavailable.  It would be tough for undefeated Colorado to not have a chance to be conference champs because USC had COVID tracing issues and didn't play Colorado.

I think even Larry would figure this out.

The better question is should UW get to play in the CCG, even if it is available?  

There are no meaningful rules this season (beyond Covid protocols), so the N/S distinction means nothing.  
If there are two undefeated teams in conference, then let them have at it, geography be damned.  Neither UW (who lost to Stanford) nor anyone else in the north would be in much of a position to complain.