10-08-2021, 06:02 PM
ASU and UCLA have in many ways similar offenses.
Daniels is the top rushing QB in the conference (59 yds/gm; 6.98 yds/carry) and DTR is #2 (43 yds/gm, 3.34 yds/carry).
Both mostly want to run the ball. UCLA runs 64.4% of all plays, ASU 60.2%.
Both then have efficient but not prolific passing games, the top two teams in PER in the conference. Daniels does so with a higher completion percentage whereas DTR leads the conference in PER mostly due to lots of big plays but a lower completion percentage.
ASU plays relatively slowly, though not so much as Stanford. They have only run 21 more plays over 5 games than has Stanford. UCLA runs more plays.
UCLA has more of a marquee running back with Charbonnet at 90 yds/gm, 6.6 yds/att. ASU's top back White is at 66 yds/gm, 5.2 yds/att.
Stanford had periods of success against UCLA's offense, but started rough then couldn't hold at the end.
Daniels is the top rushing QB in the conference (59 yds/gm; 6.98 yds/carry) and DTR is #2 (43 yds/gm, 3.34 yds/carry).
Both mostly want to run the ball. UCLA runs 64.4% of all plays, ASU 60.2%.
Both then have efficient but not prolific passing games, the top two teams in PER in the conference. Daniels does so with a higher completion percentage whereas DTR leads the conference in PER mostly due to lots of big plays but a lower completion percentage.
ASU plays relatively slowly, though not so much as Stanford. They have only run 21 more plays over 5 games than has Stanford. UCLA runs more plays.
UCLA has more of a marquee running back with Charbonnet at 90 yds/gm, 6.6 yds/att. ASU's top back White is at 66 yds/gm, 5.2 yds/att.
Stanford had periods of success against UCLA's offense, but started rough then couldn't hold at the end.