[M T]

 Antonelli who called today's game was at the Bahamas tourney so I trust her inside information.

Do you mean the announcers that apparently only see PAC-12 games when they have to call them?  The ones going off 2-month old information?
The ones that went on about Stanford's poor FT%?   The ones that didn't realize Stanford had hit 74.4% of their FTA over the last 10 games (131 of 176)?

By the way, going into the game, the season FT% (67.8) for Stanford was better than South Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and UConn, and nipping at the Tar Heels (67.9%)  (those are 6 of the top 10).    74.4% would lead every team ranked in the top 10.


Hats off to Iowa (85.5%) and Iowa State (81.3%)  for having a much higher FT% than any of the other top-25 (77.0% was the best of the other 23 of whatever top-25 I grabbed -- it still bounces around a lot).   I wonder why it is that those are from the same state?

[M T]

 Antonelli who called today's game was at the Bahamas tourney so I trust her inside information.

Do you mean the announcers that apparently only see PAC-12 games when they have to call them?  The ones going off 2-month old information?
The ones that went on about Stanford's poor FT%?   The ones that didn't realize Stanford had hit 74.4% of their FTA over the last 10 games (131 of 176)?

By the way, going into the game, the season FT% (67.8) for Stanford was better than South Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and UConn, and nipping at the Tar Heels (67.9%)  (those are 6 of the top 10).    74.4% would lead every team ranked in the top 10.


Hats off to Iowa (85.5%) and Iowa State (81.3%)  for having a much higher FT% than any of the other top-25 (77.0% was the best of the other 23 of whatever top-25 I grabbed -- it still bounces around a lot).   I wonder why it is that those are from the same state?