[teejers1]

Today's Chronicle.

Among the paragraphs: "The 22 women said that the NFL investigators were more insulting than the police."

A women's Cleveland Watson jersey is selling on the Brown's website for $119.

The fact that the grand jury did not indict is significant.  Whatever witnesses testified in that proceeding must not have been particularly convincing - admittedly for a higher standard than in a civil case.

That's a pretty bad take.  There are loads of examples of clear crimes where a grand jury did not indict.

I'm not saying that Watson is guilty or innocent.  Just that "not being prosecuted" is miles removed from "actually innocent."

Okay, berger, whatever you say.  (Ham sandwiches may want a word).

https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/11...icted.html

So is your "loads of examples," are prosecutors intentionally trying to aid guilty criminals from facing trial, or are they just incompetent?

[teejers1]

Today's Chronicle.

Among the paragraphs: "The 22 women said that the NFL investigators were more insulting than the police."

A women's Cleveland Watson jersey is selling on the Brown's website for $119.

The fact that the grand jury did not indict is significant.  Whatever witnesses testified in that proceeding must not have been particularly convincing - admittedly for a higher standard than in a civil case.

That's a pretty bad take.  There are loads of examples of clear crimes where a grand jury did not indict.

I'm not saying that Watson is guilty or innocent.  Just that "not being prosecuted" is miles removed from "actually innocent."

Okay, berger, whatever you say.  (Ham sandwiches may want a word).

https://slate.com/human-interest/2014/11...icted.html

So is your "loads of examples," are prosecutors intentionally trying to aid guilty criminals from facing trial, or are they just incompetent?