[Goose]

So is your "loads of examples," are prosecutors intentionally trying to aid guilty criminals from facing trial, or are they just incompetent?

Not being indited doesn't mean you are innocent, it rather means the Grand Jury or the prosecutor decided your guilt couldn't be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Many people who are "probably" guilty don't get indited because they are not provably guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That is how the system is supposed to work.
It is often stated that where there is smoke, there is fire. I don't necessarily subscribe to that theory. Sometimes there is, but also sometimes there isn't. I would like to see the civil case against Watson go to trial. Then we can all meaningfully decide if indeed there was misconduct. Probably will not happen and everybody involved on either "side" will end up with a somewhat tainted reputation.

[Goose]

So is your "loads of examples," are prosecutors intentionally trying to aid guilty criminals from facing trial, or are they just incompetent?

Not being indited doesn't mean you are innocent, it rather means the Grand Jury or the prosecutor decided your guilt couldn't be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Many people who are "probably" guilty don't get indited because they are not provably guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That is how the system is supposed to work.
It is often stated that where there is smoke, there is fire. I don't necessarily subscribe to that theory. Sometimes there is, but also sometimes there isn't. I would like to see the civil case against Watson go to trial. Then we can all meaningfully decide if indeed there was misconduct. Probably will not happen and everybody involved on either "side" will end up with a somewhat tainted reputation.