09-27-2012, 07:12 PM
If this were Oregon, we'd be down 3 TDs.
You can't underestimate what the first game on the road means to a starting QB.
You can't underestimate what the first game on the road means to a starting QB.
Plenty of parties in the backfield, but
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by yvonne - 09-27-2012, 06:36 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 06:41 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by FarmBoy - 09-27-2012, 06:42 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by yvonne - 09-27-2012, 06:54 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by FarmBoy - 09-27-2012, 06:56 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by pincemob - 09-27-2012, 06:58 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 07:04 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by yvonne - 09-27-2012, 07:07 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by estephan500 - 09-27-2012, 07:08 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 07:11 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by FarmBoy - 09-27-2012, 07:12 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 07:13 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 07:14 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by vataha - 09-27-2012, 07:15 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 07:16 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by stan01 - 09-27-2012, 07:31 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by FarmBoy - 09-27-2012, 07:32 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 07:32 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by vataha - 09-27-2012, 07:34 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by JohnR34231 - 09-27-2012, 07:41 PM
You are wrong Rando - by Redrum - 09-27-2012, 07:41 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Bruce Wang - 09-27-2012, 07:44 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 07:47 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by washingtonismoney - 09-27-2012, 07:47 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by vataha - 09-27-2012, 07:57 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Leftcoast - 09-27-2012, 07:57 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 07:58 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by FarmBoy - 09-27-2012, 08:15 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by JohnR34231 - 09-27-2012, 08:49 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Kathy - 09-27-2012, 09:01 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by yvonne - 09-27-2012, 09:02 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Leftcoast - 09-27-2012, 09:08 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Rando - 09-27-2012, 09:08 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Leftcoast - 09-27-2012, 09:17 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Kathy - 09-27-2012, 09:21 PM
If the offense doesn't get a lot better... - by JohnR34231 - 09-27-2012, 09:22 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Leftcoast - 09-27-2012, 09:24 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by yvonne - 09-27-2012, 09:26 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Spiny_Norman - 09-27-2012, 10:31 PM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by JohnR34231 - 09-28-2012, 03:48 AM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by oman - 09-28-2012, 05:38 AM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by JohnR34231 - 09-28-2012, 05:55 AM
Re: Plenty of parties in the backfield, but - by Treebound - 09-28-2012, 11:05 AM