10-16-2012, 02:37 PM
I know nobody is saying that this team is as moribund as 2006, Walt Harris' last year, but I was curious and looked up the stats:
In 2006, Stanford ranked 118 out of 119 FBS schools in points scored, with an average of 10.6 per game.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../year/2006
And the team ranked 116 out of 119 teams in yards per game (262).
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../year/2006
So far this year, Stanford ranks 61 out of 120 FBS teams in points per game (28.5).
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat...ntsPerGame
And 92 out of 120 FBS teams in yards per game (366.2).
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat...rdsPerGame
+++
In 2006, scoring only 20 points per game would have ranked a school 84th nationally; this year, that same number would result in a ranking of 109th.
In 2006, Stanford ranked 118 out of 119 FBS schools in points scored, with an average of 10.6 per game.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../year/2006
And the team ranked 116 out of 119 teams in yards per game (262).
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat.../year/2006
So far this year, Stanford ranks 61 out of 120 FBS teams in points per game (28.5).
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat...ntsPerGame
And 92 out of 120 FBS teams in yards per game (366.2).
http://espn.go.com/college-football/stat...rdsPerGame
+++
In 2006, scoring only 20 points per game would have ranked a school 84th nationally; this year, that same number would result in a ranking of 109th.
