(04-17-2023, 02:20 PM)PVTree Wrote: I look at it this way. It's an upgrade over Silva and may even be our starting PG.
With Raynaud, Spencer, Angel, Stoja, etc. On the floor, he may not need to be a high scorer most of the time. I see him as a PG who will not turnover the ball, play capable defense, and score 7 points a game.
I like getting an experienced PG besides MOC.
Hopefully an upgrade, especially if he can play some defense. Big East 6th man of the year. Played on an NCAA tournament team. 81% on his free throws last year.
(04-17-2023, 02:37 PM)washingtonismoney Wrote:(04-17-2023, 02:20 PM)PVTree Wrote: I look at it this way. It's an upgrade over Silva and may even be our starting PG.
Being a "starting PG" makes me far more bearish about next year's team than I'd previously contemplated.
In other news, one of the more thorough/prominent draftniks -- Nate Duncan -- visited the Hoop Summit and had some pretty mild comments on Stojakovic. In of itself that's not the worst thing, because Duncan tends to be pretty tough, but I think his general reads of players' ceilings are correct. Duncan thought it was unlikely Stojakovic would be an NBA player, which suggests he's likely to be a downgrade from Ingram, assuming the latter player leaves.
MOC/Silva were a mediocre PG tandem last year. Carlyle/Bynum would probably be an upgrade.
