10-01-2025, 11:54 AM
(10-01-2025, 11:24 AM)BostonCard Wrote: The metric should not be whether the start or not, but whether they finish. If transfer portal players graduate at a similar clip as others, great. But if this turns into a bunch of one and two-year rent a player contracts, then we should step off this train.In general I agree. However, a confounding factor is the fact that athletes admitted as freshmen to Stanford in many cases themselves transfer, some without degrees. These are also in some sense "rent a players". It is unclear to me the transfers leaving without a degree are any different. The more serious question is how athletes can keep playing without making "adequate progress towards graduation". Leaving for the NFL is today "normal". Leaving for a "better offer" is also now normal. I guess one could monitor/follow all athletes that come through Stanford and look at their ultimate graduation rates to determine if staying on the train is reasonable, but for some reason I doubt anyone will. Graduation rates were tricky enough when people stayed at the same school. Now, with people transferring multiple times it is even more difficult to monitor and interpret.
BC
