[M T]

just saw that she had replied to some criticism, and wish she'd just let it go. Loved loved watching her play at Stanford, tons of enthusiasm and hustle - sometimes a little out of control but she was our high energy player (who yes was very strong and sometimes ran into or over players but no harm intended)!

This was her reply

I’ve never once claimed that the assessment of the foul was white privilege (that was your assumption). Try exercising your critical thinking skills, I know you studied psych. Furthermore, I’m the LAST thing from ignorant or asinine when it comes to speaking on “white privilege”, do ya research on that one. I actually went to school, one of the top universities might I add, to educate myself on this exact subject. I would never use that term as a rhetorical weapon knowing the historical and social weight it holds without having the proper evidence to substantiate it.

I presume she will now need to provide her stated "proper evidence" for whatever she alleges she meant by her two word post.  I don't know if she was being careful with her wording so as to make it unclear whether the "assessment of the foul" was the initial call or the upgrade.  But, for someone who claims to be smart, she must have known what her post would appear to mean.  She can't be talking about, say, the price of white tea in China, as she tagged the post with the opposing team.

[M T]

just saw that she had replied to some criticism, and wish she'd just let it go. Loved loved watching her play at Stanford, tons of enthusiasm and hustle - sometimes a little out of control but she was our high energy player (who yes was very strong and sometimes ran into or over players but no harm intended)!

This was her reply

I’ve never once claimed that the assessment of the foul was white privilege (that was your assumption). Try exercising your critical thinking skills, I know you studied psych. Furthermore, I’m the LAST thing from ignorant or asinine when it comes to speaking on “white privilege”, do ya research on that one. I actually went to school, one of the top universities might I add, to educate myself on this exact subject. I would never use that term as a rhetorical weapon knowing the historical and social weight it holds without having the proper evidence to substantiate it.

I presume she will now need to provide her stated "proper evidence" for whatever she alleges she meant by her two word post.  I don't know if she was being careful with her wording so as to make it unclear whether the "assessment of the foul" was the initial call or the upgrade.  But, for someone who claims to be smart, she must have known what her post would appear to mean.  She can't be talking about, say, the price of white tea in China, as she tagged the post with the opposing team.