[BostonCard]

Since I've been on this board, we haven't routinely talked about who we would want to bring in once Johny Dawkins is fired, even though I get the sense that people have a stronger belief that there is a need for change in MBB over football. A debate on whether Bloomgren should be fired seems reasonable (at least for a message board; I still don't know how anyone can say with certainty who is responsible, beyond simply saying that the offense is sucking and Bloomgren is our current OC) given the offensive lack of production this season.  Talking about what kind of an offense would be a good fit for Stanford seems reasonable, which, as WIM has mentioned can be done internally.  But starting to look for replacements?  As I said, it comes across as unsavory, and I don't think the "that's what sports message boards do" excuse is valid; there's lots that happens at other message boards that we don't tolerate here (thank God).

BC

[BostonCard]

Since I've been on this board, we haven't routinely talked about who we would want to bring in once Johny Dawkins is fired, even though I get the sense that people have a stronger belief that there is a need for change in MBB over football. A debate on whether Bloomgren should be fired seems reasonable (at least for a message board; I still don't know how anyone can say with certainty who is responsible, beyond simply saying that the offense is sucking and Bloomgren is our current OC) given the offensive lack of production this season.  Talking about what kind of an offense would be a good fit for Stanford seems reasonable, which, as WIM has mentioned can be done internally.  But starting to look for replacements?  As I said, it comes across as unsavory, and I don't think the "that's what sports message boards do" excuse is valid; there's lots that happens at other message boards that we don't tolerate here (thank God).

BC