[washingtonismoney]

But when it comes to the general proposition of red zone efficiency, I doubt that it's random.

Well, it doesn't have to be either "all random" or "no random," right? There's luck of the draw in, say, Scrabble or poker, yet no one disagrees that both are skill-based games. The question is, how much random noise is involved in this particular red zone performance? The past three years' less-than-average performance suggests there's something distinctive about our redzone offense that isn't working, but what -- who knows? Or it could be a three-year-long run of bad luck, I suppose.

[washingtonismoney]

But when it comes to the general proposition of red zone efficiency, I doubt that it's random.

Well, it doesn't have to be either "all random" or "no random," right? There's luck of the draw in, say, Scrabble or poker, yet no one disagrees that both are skill-based games. The question is, how much random noise is involved in this particular red zone performance? The past three years' less-than-average performance suggests there's something distinctive about our redzone offense that isn't working, but what -- who knows? Or it could be a three-year-long run of bad luck, I suppose.