(06-22-2017, 05:01 AM)winflop link Wrote:Granted it's only one side of the story, but the way her issues were handled does not reflect well on Stanford. Muir had better get into this, and quickly. It looks like her medical issues were horribly mishandled.
While there are certainly some things described in that blog post that concern me about how Hodson's concussions were handled, based upon what I have learned about concussions from my physician wife and brother, and my own experiences with the problem; I would also note that it is difficult to know just what happened from that post and that nobody really knows how to handle concussions in a general, all-encompassing kind of way.
Stanford AD is certainly no stranger to concussion issues, and neither is any AD in the country. A bunch of Stanford's more high profile cases have been with the women's basketball team.
There's the current ongoing case of Anna Wilson:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/26908...all-career
There was Toni Kokenis who eventually retired:
http://www.stanforddaily.com/2014/05/23/...athletics/
There was Jamie Carey who transferred to Texas so she could play:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/06/sports...carey.html
The comments upon Stanford's actions run the gamut.
There is no real comment upon Stanford on the Wilson case, though it seems she found help elsewhere.
There is a sense of dissatisfaction with Stanford procedures in the Kokenis article for not restricting her further, along with an acknowledgement that nobody really knows what to do.
There is a sense that Stanford was too stringent in the Carey case, after all she went on to play at Texas and the WNBA with apparently no adverse effects (that I have heard about anyway - though what I may have heard is pretty limited).