09-16-2017, 09:40 PM
Defense is playing like they were on the field for 24 minutes in the first half. WE could be in trouble.
BC
BC
Stanford at SDSU Game Thread
Defense is playing like they were on the field for 24 minutes in the first half. WE could be in trouble.
BC
BC
09-16-2017, 09:41 PM
Our Defense needs to ATTACK, not just stop.
FORCE a turnover !
FORCE a turnover !
Just love slamming those over-hyped beach body schools.
If you heard Cal Sucks, you'd be right.
Our Defense needs to ATTACK, not just stop.
FORCE a turnover !
FORCE a turnover !
Just love slamming those over-hyped beach body schools.
If you heard Cal Sucks, you'd be right.
09-16-2017, 09:42 PM
BC, Can you tell me again why it's better to get the ball to start the game rather than in the second half?
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
BC, Can you tell me again why it's better to get the ball to start the game rather than in the second half?
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
09-16-2017, 09:43 PM
Perez is just lost out there. Why is he playing?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-16-2017, 09:43 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:43 PM)martyup link Wrote:Perez is just lost out there. Why is he playing?
Because Barton is out with a knee injury.
BC
(09-16-2017, 09:43 PM)martyup link Wrote:Perez is just lost out there. Why is he playing?
Because Barton is out with a knee injury.
BC
09-16-2017, 09:43 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:37 PM)Card Fan in OR link Wrote:Hey, for those of us lucky or unlucky enough not to be able to watch the game, could someone post a score periodically? Don't know if we're winning or losing--though it certainly sounds like my prediction is shot to blazes. Thanks.
Somewhat discouraged
CFIO
I can neither see nor hear (KZSU has had a serendipitous broadcast malfunction) the clusterF that was the first half, and for that I am blessed. Either the whole of Stanford football (from the waterpersons up to the Head Coach) "man" up in the 2nd half we are in deep doo doo.
All models are wrong; some models are useful......
George Box
(09-16-2017, 09:37 PM)Card Fan in OR link Wrote:Hey, for those of us lucky or unlucky enough not to be able to watch the game, could someone post a score periodically? Don't know if we're winning or losing--though it certainly sounds like my prediction is shot to blazes. Thanks.
Somewhat discouraged
CFIO
I can neither see nor hear (KZSU has had a serendipitous broadcast malfunction) the clusterF that was the first half, and for that I am blessed. Either the whole of Stanford football (from the waterpersons up to the Head Coach) "man" up in the 2nd half we are in deep doo doo.
All models are wrong; some models are useful......
George Box
09-16-2017, 09:45 PM
The scorre is 10-7 SDSU with San Diego State having 4th down on our 15ish. They were going to go for it, but had a 12-man on the field infraction.
BC
BC
The scorre is 10-7 SDSU with San Diego State having 4th down on our 15ish. They were going to go for it, but had a 12-man on the field infraction.
BC
BC
09-16-2017, 09:45 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:43 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=martyup link=topic=17411.msg200921#msg200921 date=1505623391]
Perez is just lost out there. Why is he playing?
Because Barton is out with a knee injury.
BC
[/quote]
I thought he was 3 deep on the depth chart.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
(09-16-2017, 09:43 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:[quote author=martyup link=topic=17411.msg200921#msg200921 date=1505623391]
Perez is just lost out there. Why is he playing?
Because Barton is out with a knee injury.
BC
[/quote]
I thought he was 3 deep on the depth chart.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-16-2017, 09:45 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:42 PM)amartinsu13 link Wrote:WHY DOES BRYCE LOVE ONLY HAVE 6 CARRIES
Because we hardly have any plays.
This game is going inexplicably badly. Like we just suck at everything all of a sudden.
09-16-2017, 09:47 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:42 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:It's not better. It makes no difference.
BC
I think you argued the opposite last week. As Hillary said, at this point, what does it matter.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
(09-16-2017, 09:42 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:It's not better. It makes no difference.
BC
I think you argued the opposite last week. As Hillary said, at this point, what does it matter.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
09-16-2017, 09:48 PM
Costello had some zip on warm up throws. But Burns and Chryst were taking most of them.
Let's see if we can get some push here. Gut check drive.
Let's see if we can get some push here. Gut check drive.
09-16-2017, 09:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2017, 09:50 PM by North Woods.)
Apart from the TD Love has 5 yards on 5 carries. Not getting much.
Where are our tight ends?
Where are our tight ends?
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2017, 09:50 PM by North Woods.)
Apart from the TD Love has 5 yards on 5 carries. Not getting much.
Where are our tight ends?
Where are our tight ends?
09-16-2017, 09:51 PM
It's strange because it's as if the entire offense decided to panic in the wake of the SC game. But the SC game, while not going to be one for the scrapbook, was fine.
Now we've got a terrible performance. Randomly inserting new OL to start off the game. Now shuttling QBs in and out. These are symptoms of a staff that thinks it has problems but doesn't have any solutions to solve those problems. Ergo, the staff should depart.
Now we've got a terrible performance. Randomly inserting new OL to start off the game. Now shuttling QBs in and out. These are symptoms of a staff that thinks it has problems but doesn't have any solutions to solve those problems. Ergo, the staff should depart.
It's strange because it's as if the entire offense decided to panic in the wake of the SC game. But the SC game, while not going to be one for the scrapbook, was fine.
Now we've got a terrible performance. Randomly inserting new OL to start off the game. Now shuttling QBs in and out. These are symptoms of a staff that thinks it has problems but doesn't have any solutions to solve those problems. Ergo, the staff should depart.
Now we've got a terrible performance. Randomly inserting new OL to start off the game. Now shuttling QBs in and out. These are symptoms of a staff that thinks it has problems but doesn't have any solutions to solve those problems. Ergo, the staff should depart.
09-16-2017, 09:51 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:47 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17411.msg200920#msg200920 date=1505623370]
It's not better. It makes no difference.
BC
I think you argued the opposite last week. As Hillary said, at this point, what does it matter.
[/quote]
I believe the question was why do we do it. I offered up the Shaw's rationale for receiving. I didn't mean to imply I favored it, but I certainly don't think it is a bad idea, as some have suggested.
BC
(09-16-2017, 09:47 PM)cardcrimson link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=17411.msg200920#msg200920 date=1505623370]
It's not better. It makes no difference.
BC
I think you argued the opposite last week. As Hillary said, at this point, what does it matter.
[/quote]
I believe the question was why do we do it. I offered up the Shaw's rationale for receiving. I didn't mean to imply I favored it, but I certainly don't think it is a bad idea, as some have suggested.
BC
09-16-2017, 09:53 PM
(09-16-2017, 09:48 PM)North Woods link Wrote:Apart from the TD Love has 5 yards on 5 carries. Not getting much.
Where are our tight ends?
We need more posts like this. No sooner do you post it than Love goes for 47 yards, and then we throw it to Schultz.
BC
(09-16-2017, 09:48 PM)North Woods link Wrote:Apart from the TD Love has 5 yards on 5 carries. Not getting much.
Where are our tight ends?
We need more posts like this. No sooner do you post it than Love goes for 47 yards, and then we throw it to Schultz.
BC
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »