03-10-2018, 11:45 AM
OK, it's time for some thread drift into more general HOF discussion...
Patrick Willis is probably acknowledged to be a HOF LB, given he was a 7-time Pro Bowl and 5-time All-Pro selection in an 8-year career he voluntarily cut short. But then you look at Navorro Bowman.
Bowman was arguably better at the peak of his career than Willis. Right at that peak he suffered the most gruesome knee injury in the 2013 season NFC CG, that cost him the entire 2014 season. Yet he returned in 2015 to make his third All-Pro team and 5th Pro Bowl on a lousy team. Then he too tore his achilles in 2016. He came back in 2017 but didn't return to his previous HOF-level production.
So on the one hand, you have a guy in Willis who though he suffered some injuries, never had a catastrophic one that cost him most of or all of a season, and was the best at his position for most of the years he played. Then you have Bowman, who arguably was a better player at his peak, overcame a catastrophic knee injury at his peak and returned to HOF level, only to suffer another major injury that when he returned from, kept him from being that HOF level again.
Richard Sherman might be somewhat of an analog to Bowman. Though he has one less season than Bowman, he too is a 5-time Pro Bowl and 3-time All-Pro selection before suffering a catastrophic achilles injury. I would argue Bowman and Sherman were equivalently excellent players at their positions. Sherman played in two Super Bowls and won one. Bowman played in three NFC CGs, and was 0-1 in the Super Bowl. Of course, Sherman, like another guy mentioned below, has made quite a house hold name for himself. That will go a long way in getting him to the HOF, IMO.
So the net of this is Patrick Willis is assumed to be a HOF player by most observers, but Bowman may have been better overall. Willis gets some knocks for only playing 8 seasons, but Bowman was only great for 7 until the achilles injury. Then Sherman has a very similar career to Bowman, but was probably more influential on the game.Â
The HOF is suppose to be for the elite of the elite, not just players who were great, but where do you draw the line? To me, Bryant Young was a HOF DL. He also suffered a devastating injury that made him a lesser player after his return, though he still managed a few Pro Bowls. Of course, he was also a quiet guy who didn't create a big name for himself, like say Warren Sapp and Sherman. He just did his job in the trenches of NFL games, equally good against pass and run, and he did it for 14 years. But you never hear Young mentioned as a possible HOF player.
Patrick Willis is probably acknowledged to be a HOF LB, given he was a 7-time Pro Bowl and 5-time All-Pro selection in an 8-year career he voluntarily cut short. But then you look at Navorro Bowman.
Bowman was arguably better at the peak of his career than Willis. Right at that peak he suffered the most gruesome knee injury in the 2013 season NFC CG, that cost him the entire 2014 season. Yet he returned in 2015 to make his third All-Pro team and 5th Pro Bowl on a lousy team. Then he too tore his achilles in 2016. He came back in 2017 but didn't return to his previous HOF-level production.
So on the one hand, you have a guy in Willis who though he suffered some injuries, never had a catastrophic one that cost him most of or all of a season, and was the best at his position for most of the years he played. Then you have Bowman, who arguably was a better player at his peak, overcame a catastrophic knee injury at his peak and returned to HOF level, only to suffer another major injury that when he returned from, kept him from being that HOF level again.
Richard Sherman might be somewhat of an analog to Bowman. Though he has one less season than Bowman, he too is a 5-time Pro Bowl and 3-time All-Pro selection before suffering a catastrophic achilles injury. I would argue Bowman and Sherman were equivalently excellent players at their positions. Sherman played in two Super Bowls and won one. Bowman played in three NFC CGs, and was 0-1 in the Super Bowl. Of course, Sherman, like another guy mentioned below, has made quite a house hold name for himself. That will go a long way in getting him to the HOF, IMO.
So the net of this is Patrick Willis is assumed to be a HOF player by most observers, but Bowman may have been better overall. Willis gets some knocks for only playing 8 seasons, but Bowman was only great for 7 until the achilles injury. Then Sherman has a very similar career to Bowman, but was probably more influential on the game.Â
The HOF is suppose to be for the elite of the elite, not just players who were great, but where do you draw the line? To me, Bryant Young was a HOF DL. He also suffered a devastating injury that made him a lesser player after his return, though he still managed a few Pro Bowls. Of course, he was also a quiet guy who didn't create a big name for himself, like say Warren Sapp and Sherman. He just did his job in the trenches of NFL games, equally good against pass and run, and he did it for 14 years. But you never hear Young mentioned as a possible HOF player.

