08-31-2018, 07:07 PM
Wow. The local pundits are sure on target!
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
The CardBoard
/
C-House!
/
The CardBoard
/
Unstoppable Offense? We Smoke These Guys? It's over by Halftime?
Unstoppable Offense? We Smoke These Guys? It's over by Halftime?
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
Wow. The local pundits are sure on target!
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
08-31-2018, 08:21 PM
How dare people be optimistic.
![[Image: 200.gif]](https://i.giphy.com/media/y16RlodxUwu3K/200.gif)
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-01-2018, 09:00 AM
(09-01-2018, 07:46 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:(08-31-2018, 10:51 PM)d4cohn Wrote: We sure smoked them in the second half. :)
How many rushing yards did we have in the second half? How many times was Love hit in the backfield?
I mean, if a team wants to play cover 0 all game and bottle up Love at the cost of giving up 300+ passing yards, 4 passing TDs, and losing by 21, I think we should be pretty okay with it.
(09-01-2018, 07:46 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:(08-31-2018, 10:51 PM)d4cohn Wrote: We sure smoked them in the second half. :)
How many rushing yards did we have in the second half? How many times was Love hit in the backfield?
I mean, if a team wants to play cover 0 all game and bottle up Love at the cost of giving up 300+ passing yards, 4 passing TDs, and losing by 21, I think we should be pretty okay with it.
09-01-2018, 02:09 PM
(09-01-2018, 09:47 AM)terry Wrote: Winning by a margin of 31-10 qualifies as "we smoke these guys."
We were clearly the much better team.
Beat the spread (-13 or -14 depending on where you got your line), Connelly's S&P+ projected margin (12), and Sagarin's expected margin (17). It wasn't a flukey result; Stanford had about 1.4 yards per play more. Turnovers were even and if anything a bit unlucky for Stanford (it recovered 50% of fumbles; it converted 0/3 PBUs into INTs while SDSU got 1/4... which is mildly unlucky). Overall Stanford did a bit better than expected by the projectors.
(09-01-2018, 09:47 AM)terry Wrote: Winning by a margin of 31-10 qualifies as "we smoke these guys."
We were clearly the much better team.
Beat the spread (-13 or -14 depending on where you got your line), Connelly's S&P+ projected margin (12), and Sagarin's expected margin (17). It wasn't a flukey result; Stanford had about 1.4 yards per play more. Turnovers were even and if anything a bit unlucky for Stanford (it recovered 50% of fumbles; it converted 0/3 PBUs into INTs while SDSU got 1/4... which is mildly unlucky). Overall Stanford did a bit better than expected by the projectors.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »