12-31-2018, 01:18 PM
Sun Bowl Game Thread
Tough crowd? We had zero yards and zero points in the first quarter. We just gave up a 75 yard drive and trail by 3 with a little over 2 minutes to go in the half. Pathetic.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
Tough crowd? We had zero yards and zero points in the first quarter. We just gave up a 75 yard drive and trail by 3 with a little over 2 minutes to go in the half. Pathetic.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
12-31-2018, 01:21 PM
THank you, Cardcrimson! I agree that sticker is a good tribute for the fire tragedies.
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
THank you, Cardcrimson! I agree that sticker is a good tribute for the fire tragedies.
DIE LUFT DER FREIHEIT WEHT
12-31-2018, 01:22 PM
Two minute drill with full timeouts. Let's watch . . .
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
12-31-2018, 01:23 PM
(12-31-2018, 01:19 PM)martyup Wrote: Tough crowd? We had zero yards and zero points in the first quarter. We just gave up a 75 yard drive and trail by 3 with a little over 2 minutes to go in the half. Pathetic.
Because we are down three points and had a bad first quarter offensively it's pathetic?
This is a tough crowd.
(12-31-2018, 01:19 PM)martyup Wrote: Tough crowd? We had zero yards and zero points in the first quarter. We just gave up a 75 yard drive and trail by 3 with a little over 2 minutes to go in the half. Pathetic.
Because we are down three points and had a bad first quarter offensively it's pathetic?
This is a tough crowd.
12-31-2018, 01:25 PM
(12-31-2018, 01:19 PM)martyup Wrote: Tough crowd? We had zero yards and zero points in the first quarter. We just gave up a 75 yard drive and trail by 3 with a little over 2 minutes to go in the half. Pathetic.
My ESP isn't very good. I posted right after we scored, not after Pitt answered.
12-31-2018, 01:26 PM
False start with 1:34, 3rd and 10, pass incomplete. Punt.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
12-31-2018, 01:26 PM
Of course with third and ten, we may want the clock to tick.
And, Pitt will get the ball back with 3 time outs and 1 minute 30 on the clock.
BC
And, Pitt will get the ball back with 3 time outs and 1 minute 30 on the clock.
BC
Of course with third and ten, we may want the clock to tick.
And, Pitt will get the ball back with 3 time outs and 1 minute 30 on the clock.
BC
And, Pitt will get the ball back with 3 time outs and 1 minute 30 on the clock.
BC
12-31-2018, 01:28 PM
(12-31-2018, 01:23 PM)JohnR34231 Wrote:(12-31-2018, 01:19 PM)martyup Wrote: Tough crowd? We had zero yards and zero points in the first quarter. We just gave up a 75 yard drive and trail by 3 with a little over 2 minutes to go in the half. Pathetic.
Because we are down three points and had a bad first quarter offensively it's pathetic?
This is a tough crowd.
If 1 yard of total offense and zero points in a full quarter isn't pathetic, what is?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
(12-31-2018, 01:23 PM)JohnR34231 Wrote:(12-31-2018, 01:19 PM)martyup Wrote: Tough crowd? We had zero yards and zero points in the first quarter. We just gave up a 75 yard drive and trail by 3 with a little over 2 minutes to go in the half. Pathetic.
Because we are down three points and had a bad first quarter offensively it's pathetic?
This is a tough crowd.
If 1 yard of total offense and zero points in a full quarter isn't pathetic, what is?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
12-31-2018, 01:29 PM
We were very vulnerable to a fake outside followed by a run up the middle on the last Pitt drive. Hope there can be a halftime adjustment (that doesn't let the outside run kill us).
We were very vulnerable to a fake outside followed by a run up the middle on the last Pitt drive. Hope there can be a halftime adjustment (that doesn't let the outside run kill us).
12-31-2018, 01:31 PM
If this is our preview of next year's team, I am concerned.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
12-31-2018, 01:32 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-31-2018, 01:34 PM by BostonCard.)
That was quite a BS call.
BC
We're lucky Okereke wasn't called for a targetting; he had his hands up to try to bat down the pass, but he did hit the Pitt QB in the head.
BC
BC
We're lucky Okereke wasn't called for a targetting; he had his hands up to try to bat down the pass, but he did hit the Pitt QB in the head.
BC
(This post was last modified: 12-31-2018, 01:34 PM by BostonCard.)
That was quite a BS call.
BC
We're lucky Okereke wasn't called for a targetting; he had his hands up to try to bat down the pass, but he did hit the Pitt QB in the head.
BC
BC
We're lucky Okereke wasn't called for a targetting; he had his hands up to try to bat down the pass, but he did hit the Pitt QB in the head.
BC
12-31-2018, 01:35 PM
(12-31-2018, 01:28 PM)martyup Wrote:(12-31-2018, 01:23 PM)JohnR34231 Wrote:(12-31-2018, 01:19 PM)martyup Wrote: Tough crowd? We had zero yards and zero points in the first quarter. We just gave up a 75 yard drive and trail by 3 with a little over 2 minutes to go in the half. Pathetic.
Because we are down three points and had a bad first quarter offensively it's pathetic?
This is a tough crowd.
If 1 yard of total offense and zero points in a full quarter isn't pathetic, what is?
When they start playing games for just one quarter, then I'll agree with you.
(12-31-2018, 01:28 PM)martyup Wrote:(12-31-2018, 01:23 PM)JohnR34231 Wrote:(12-31-2018, 01:19 PM)martyup Wrote: Tough crowd? We had zero yards and zero points in the first quarter. We just gave up a 75 yard drive and trail by 3 with a little over 2 minutes to go in the half. Pathetic.
Because we are down three points and had a bad first quarter offensively it's pathetic?
This is a tough crowd.
If 1 yard of total offense and zero points in a full quarter isn't pathetic, what is?
When they start playing games for just one quarter, then I'll agree with you.
12-31-2018, 01:38 PM
Over on ESPN, there is a good game coming down to the wire between Cincy and VA Tech
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
12-31-2018, 01:40 PM
Total yards: Pitt 226, Stanford 85
First downs: Pitt 13, Stanford 4
Third down efficiency: Pitt 4/9, Stanford 0/5
Time of possession: Pitt 19:43, Stanford 10:17
Yards per play: Pitt 5.5, Stanford 3.7
Given that the score is only 10-7, you would have thought that Stanford was up a couple of turnovers, but so far no turnovers.
BC
First downs: Pitt 13, Stanford 4
Third down efficiency: Pitt 4/9, Stanford 0/5
Time of possession: Pitt 19:43, Stanford 10:17
Yards per play: Pitt 5.5, Stanford 3.7
Given that the score is only 10-7, you would have thought that Stanford was up a couple of turnovers, but so far no turnovers.
BC
Total yards: Pitt 226, Stanford 85
First downs: Pitt 13, Stanford 4
Third down efficiency: Pitt 4/9, Stanford 0/5
Time of possession: Pitt 19:43, Stanford 10:17
Yards per play: Pitt 5.5, Stanford 3.7
Given that the score is only 10-7, you would have thought that Stanford was up a couple of turnovers, but so far no turnovers.
BC
First downs: Pitt 13, Stanford 4
Third down efficiency: Pitt 4/9, Stanford 0/5
Time of possession: Pitt 19:43, Stanford 10:17
Yards per play: Pitt 5.5, Stanford 3.7
Given that the score is only 10-7, you would have thought that Stanford was up a couple of turnovers, but so far no turnovers.
BC
12-31-2018, 01:43 PM
(12-31-2018, 01:40 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Total yards: Pitt 226, Stanford 85
First downs: Pitt 13, Stanford 4
Third down efficiency: Pitt 4/9, Stanford 0/5
Time of possession: Pitt 19:43, Stanford 10:17
Yards per play: Pitt 5.5, Stanford 3.7
Given that the score is only 10-7, you would have thought that Stanford was up a couple of turnovers, but so far no turnovers.
BC
The defense can be applauded for holding Pitt to 10 in a half. This must be the worst offensive performance in a half by a Stanford team . . . ever?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
(12-31-2018, 01:40 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Total yards: Pitt 226, Stanford 85
First downs: Pitt 13, Stanford 4
Third down efficiency: Pitt 4/9, Stanford 0/5
Time of possession: Pitt 19:43, Stanford 10:17
Yards per play: Pitt 5.5, Stanford 3.7
Given that the score is only 10-7, you would have thought that Stanford was up a couple of turnovers, but so far no turnovers.
BC
The defense can be applauded for holding Pitt to 10 in a half. This must be the worst offensive performance in a half by a Stanford team . . . ever?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
12-31-2018, 01:47 PM
Yeah, but it's only a half. Doubt it can be labelled pathetic yet.
"It's not what you don't know that gets you in trouble. It's what you think you know that just isn't so."
Mark Twain
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »