11-09-2019, 01:51 PM
JJ! Making like JJAW!
Ok, time for next to start (CU game thread)
11-09-2019, 01:52 PM
(11-09-2019, 01:49 PM)martyup Wrote: The days of big hitters is gone. The targeting rule makes it too risky to play like that. If you are getting ready to lower the boom and the ball carrier simply drops his head to meet yours, then you are gone from the game and half the next game if it happens in the second half. Not worth it.
You’ve watched too many Stanford games. Watch the SEC. You’ll see plenty of big hits.
(11-09-2019, 01:49 PM)martyup Wrote: The days of big hitters is gone. The targeting rule makes it too risky to play like that. If you are getting ready to lower the boom and the ball carrier simply drops his head to meet yours, then you are gone from the game and half the next game if it happens in the second half. Not worth it.
You’ve watched too many Stanford games. Watch the SEC. You’ll see plenty of big hits.
11-09-2019, 01:52 PM
I was thinking it was time for Montez to make an error. He obliged my thinking!
I was thinking it was time for Montez to make an error. He obliged my thinking!
11-09-2019, 01:53 PM
(11-09-2019, 01:52 PM)lex24 Wrote:(11-09-2019, 01:49 PM)martyup Wrote: The days of big hitters is gone. The targeting rule makes it too risky to play like that. If you are getting ready to lower the boom and the ball carrier simply drops his head to meet yours, then you are gone from the game and half the next game if it happens in the second half. Not worth it.
You’ve watched too many Stanford games. Watch the SEC. You’ll see plenty of big hits.
Yes, and I've seen plenty of targeting ejections.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
(11-09-2019, 01:52 PM)lex24 Wrote:(11-09-2019, 01:49 PM)martyup Wrote: The days of big hitters is gone. The targeting rule makes it too risky to play like that. If you are getting ready to lower the boom and the ball carrier simply drops his head to meet yours, then you are gone from the game and half the next game if it happens in the second half. Not worth it.
You’ve watched too many Stanford games. Watch the SEC. You’ll see plenty of big hits.
Yes, and I've seen plenty of targeting ejections.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
11-09-2019, 02:01 PM
I’ve got a crazy idea Use the freaking middle of the field and throw the ball over the middle
(11-09-2019, 02:03 PM)lex24 Wrote: I’ve got a crazy idea Use the freaking middle of the field and throw the ball over the middle. Nope can’t do it. Instead they once again goes towards the sideline to the guy who is the most overrated player I could remember at Stanford in a long time
I’ve got a crazy idea Use the freaking middle of the field and throw the ball over the middle
(11-09-2019, 02:03 PM)lex24 Wrote: I’ve got a crazy idea Use the freaking middle of the field and throw the ball over the middle. Nope can’t do it. Instead they once again goes towards the sideline to the guy who is the most overrated player I could remember at Stanford in a long time
11-09-2019, 02:05 PM
Get close to the goal line and it’s like the goddamn middle of the field doesn’t exist. They got down there with two passes over the middle the field.
2nd and 7 and we throw the fade. 3rd and 7 and we throw the fade. Why not just pound the ball to get 7 yards in 2 plays on the ground? What do I know? Dammit.
I saw that too. Why didn't the reviewer see it? Sucks!
(11-09-2019, 02:05 PM)JJJ Wrote:(11-09-2019, 02:01 PM)lex24 Wrote: Nope. Out of bounds. That will be reversed. Actually he may have got toe down.
Toe definitely came down first.
I saw that too. Why didn't the reviewer see it? Sucks!
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
2nd and 7 and we throw the fade. 3rd and 7 and we throw the fade. Why not just pound the ball to get 7 yards in 2 plays on the ground? What do I know? Dammit.
I saw that too. Why didn't the reviewer see it? Sucks!
(11-09-2019, 02:05 PM)JJJ Wrote:(11-09-2019, 02:01 PM)lex24 Wrote: Nope. Out of bounds. That will be reversed. Actually he may have got toe down.
Toe definitely came down first.
I saw that too. Why didn't the reviewer see it? Sucks!
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
11-09-2019, 02:07 PM
Stanford offense did not show up for the first half.
It's a minor miracle that Colorado isn't ahead by a couple of touchdowns.
I don't remember feeling this pessimistic so early about a game since UCF (I didn't watch the UCLA game).
It's a minor miracle that Colorado isn't ahead by a couple of touchdowns.
I don't remember feeling this pessimistic so early about a game since UCF (I didn't watch the UCLA game).
11-09-2019, 02:07 PM
Game certainly not going the way I hoped it would. Instead of a 14-7 lead, we are trailing 7-6. And we even needed a takeaway to be in this position. Not a stellar exploitation of opportunities so far.
Game certainly not going the way I hoped it would. Instead of a 14-7 lead, we are trailing 7-6. And we even needed a takeaway to be in this position. Not a stellar exploitation of opportunities so far.
So, it won’t happen. I’d actually love to see Stanford pick up the tempo offensively. Right now they look freaking bored half the time. Or maybe they’re just boring me. Pick the tempo up go fast change things a little bit inject some energy. Try something different. It’s not illegal
Got hammered again. Makes a difference when you hit the quarterback.
Got hammered again. Makes a difference when you hit the quarterback.
So, it won’t happen. I’d actually love to see Stanford pick up the tempo offensively. Right now they look freaking bored half the time. Or maybe they’re just boring me. Pick the tempo up go fast change things a little bit inject some energy. Try something different. It’s not illegal
Got hammered again. Makes a difference when you hit the quarterback.
Got hammered again. Makes a difference when you hit the quarterback.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »