Zhang generously conceded a 2.5 foot putt on 36; soon after, Ruffels refused to concede a nearly identical putt for Zhang (who made it). Then Ruffels left herself a 2.5-footer and missed it. Total karma! I love it!
The CardBoard
/
C-House!
/
The CardBoard
/
W Golf: Our incoming frosh is 1st in US Women's amateur stroke play
W Golf: Our incoming frosh is 1st in US Women's amateur stroke play
Zhang generously conceded a 2.5 foot putt on 36; soon after, Ruffels refused to concede a nearly identical putt for Zhang (who made it). Then Ruffels left herself a 2.5-footer and missed it. Total karma! I love it!
Softball Fan
Unregistered
Unregistered
08-09-2020, 03:04 PM
What an outstanding performance by Zhang. A 17 year old kid with nerves of steel.
What an outstanding performance by Zhang. A 17 year old kid with nerves of steel.
She has superb tempo, driver down to putter, and the most fundamentally sound and repeatable swing in the event.
And the second best player this week was Heck.
She demolished the field, based on strokes under par,
but had to face the winner in the round of 16.
Heck, Zhang, Yi, Krauter and Engleman in 2021, and Heck, Zhang, Ganne, Yi, and Krauter/Engleman in 2022 Could be superb.
(Note that Ganne took Albane Valenzuela to extra holes in last year's women's am semi. Seems like a great kid, too.)
And the second best player this week was Heck.
She demolished the field, based on strokes under par,
but had to face the winner in the round of 16.
Heck, Zhang, Yi, Krauter and Engleman in 2021, and Heck, Zhang, Ganne, Yi, and Krauter/Engleman in 2022 Could be superb.
(Note that Ganne took Albane Valenzuela to extra holes in last year's women's am semi. Seems like a great kid, too.)
She has superb tempo, driver down to putter, and the most fundamentally sound and repeatable swing in the event.
And the second best player this week was Heck.
She demolished the field, based on strokes under par,
but had to face the winner in the round of 16.
Heck, Zhang, Yi, Krauter and Engleman in 2021, and Heck, Zhang, Ganne, Yi, and Krauter/Engleman in 2022 Could be superb.
(Note that Ganne took Albane Valenzuela to extra holes in last year's women's am semi. Seems like a great kid, too.)
And the second best player this week was Heck.
She demolished the field, based on strokes under par,
but had to face the winner in the round of 16.
Heck, Zhang, Yi, Krauter and Engleman in 2021, and Heck, Zhang, Ganne, Yi, and Krauter/Engleman in 2022 Could be superb.
(Note that Ganne took Albane Valenzuela to extra holes in last year's women's am semi. Seems like a great kid, too.)
(08-09-2020, 02:47 PM)oldalum Wrote: Zhang generously conceded a 2.5 foot putt on 36; soon after, Ruffels refused to concede a nearly identical putt for Zhang (who made it). Then Ruffels left herself a 2.5-footer and missed it. Total karma! I love it!
Thanks for your post. I decided to go for a bike ride and set the DVR. Unfortunately the recording ended at the tee box on 17. I had to see what you had described, and here it is for anyone else to see. Start at 27:30 to see Zhang's beauty onto the green, and the subsequent putts in question.
2020 US Women's Amateur
(08-09-2020, 02:47 PM)oldalum Wrote: Zhang generously conceded a 2.5 foot putt on 36; soon after, Ruffels refused to concede a nearly identical putt for Zhang (who made it). Then Ruffels left herself a 2.5-footer and missed it. Total karma! I love it!
Thanks for your post. I decided to go for a bike ride and set the DVR. Unfortunately the recording ended at the tee box on 17. I had to see what you had described, and here it is for anyone else to see. Start at 27:30 to see Zhang's beauty onto the green, and the subsequent putts in question.
2020 US Women's Amateur
08-10-2020, 12:35 AM
(08-09-2020, 05:09 PM)Embo Wrote:(08-09-2020, 02:47 PM)oldalum Wrote: Zhang generously conceded a 2.5 foot putt on 36; soon after, Ruffels refused to concede a nearly identical putt for Zhang (who made it). Then Ruffels left herself a 2.5-footer and missed it. Total karma! I love it!
Thanks for your post. I decided to go for a bike ride and set the DVR. Unfortunately the recording ended at the tee box on 17. I had to see what you had described, and here it is for anyone else to see. Start at 27:30 to see Zhang's beauty onto the green, and the subsequent putts in question.
2020 US Women's Amateur
Thanks for the commentary everyone (and to Embo for the video). It really did seem a bit like karma (though maybe Ruffels was miffed that she even had to putt on 38, given that she had given a slightly shorter putt to Zhang. Regardless, great match and congrats to both . . . but especially "our" Zhang!!
P.S. Why would anyone question whether there will be competitive college golf this coming year? It is the definition of a socially distanced sport. Heck, they even had some spectators there (or so it sounded) and that was NBD. I guess if ADs don't have the money to fund teams, that might be a problem . . .
(08-09-2020, 05:09 PM)Embo Wrote:(08-09-2020, 02:47 PM)oldalum Wrote: Zhang generously conceded a 2.5 foot putt on 36; soon after, Ruffels refused to concede a nearly identical putt for Zhang (who made it). Then Ruffels left herself a 2.5-footer and missed it. Total karma! I love it!
Thanks for your post. I decided to go for a bike ride and set the DVR. Unfortunately the recording ended at the tee box on 17. I had to see what you had described, and here it is for anyone else to see. Start at 27:30 to see Zhang's beauty onto the green, and the subsequent putts in question.
2020 US Women's Amateur
Thanks for the commentary everyone (and to Embo for the video). It really did seem a bit like karma (though maybe Ruffels was miffed that she even had to putt on 38, given that she had given a slightly shorter putt to Zhang. Regardless, great match and congrats to both . . . but especially "our" Zhang!!
P.S. Why would anyone question whether there will be competitive college golf this coming year? It is the definition of a socially distanced sport. Heck, they even had some spectators there (or so it sounded) and that was NBD. I guess if ADs don't have the money to fund teams, that might be a problem . . .
Back in my golf days, a common recommendation in match play was to give your competitor a series of short putts, then force them to putt one. The thought behind it was your foe would be out of practice, and perhaps unsettled.
Coverage of everything has become very frustrating.
The Golf online site story today reports that Zhang is coming to Stanford this fall (no)
and that Ruffels' final missed putt was a six-footer. It was maybe 50 inches.
Coverage of everything has become very frustrating.
The Golf online site story today reports that Zhang is coming to Stanford this fall (no)
and that Ruffels' final missed putt was a six-footer. It was maybe 50 inches.
Back in my golf days, a common recommendation in match play was to give your competitor a series of short putts, then force them to putt one. The thought behind it was your foe would be out of practice, and perhaps unsettled.
Coverage of everything has become very frustrating.
The Golf online site story today reports that Zhang is coming to Stanford this fall (no)
and that Ruffels' final missed putt was a six-footer. It was maybe 50 inches.
Coverage of everything has become very frustrating.
The Golf online site story today reports that Zhang is coming to Stanford this fall (no)
and that Ruffels' final missed putt was a six-footer. It was maybe 50 inches.
08-10-2020, 03:42 PM
Stanford’s 2022 team:
A three-time, first team Rolex All American and US Amateur medalist (Heck);
A first team Rolex All American and first team college All American (Ye);
A five-time Rolex All American (twice as a first team choice) and, as a senior, America’s second-ranked junior player (Engleman);
A four-time first team Rolex All American and 2020 US Amateur champion (Zhang);
A first team Rolex All American as a sophomore and a US Amateur semifinalist as a freshman (Ganne);
A three-time Rolex All America, once as a first team choice (Seay);
and a two-time second team Rolex All American (Reyes).
By way of comparison, the Stackhouse national championship team had only three players who had ever had been named to a Rolex team, and only two, Casey Danielson and Shannon Aubert, who ever made the 12-player first team.
A three-time, first team Rolex All American and US Amateur medalist (Heck);
A first team Rolex All American and first team college All American (Ye);
A five-time Rolex All American (twice as a first team choice) and, as a senior, America’s second-ranked junior player (Engleman);
A four-time first team Rolex All American and 2020 US Amateur champion (Zhang);
A first team Rolex All American as a sophomore and a US Amateur semifinalist as a freshman (Ganne);
A three-time Rolex All America, once as a first team choice (Seay);
and a two-time second team Rolex All American (Reyes).
By way of comparison, the Stackhouse national championship team had only three players who had ever had been named to a Rolex team, and only two, Casey Danielson and Shannon Aubert, who ever made the 12-player first team.
Stanford’s 2022 team:
A three-time, first team Rolex All American and US Amateur medalist (Heck);
A first team Rolex All American and first team college All American (Ye);
A five-time Rolex All American (twice as a first team choice) and, as a senior, America’s second-ranked junior player (Engleman);
A four-time first team Rolex All American and 2020 US Amateur champion (Zhang);
A first team Rolex All American as a sophomore and a US Amateur semifinalist as a freshman (Ganne);
A three-time Rolex All America, once as a first team choice (Seay);
and a two-time second team Rolex All American (Reyes).
By way of comparison, the Stackhouse national championship team had only three players who had ever had been named to a Rolex team, and only two, Casey Danielson and Shannon Aubert, who ever made the 12-player first team.
A three-time, first team Rolex All American and US Amateur medalist (Heck);
A first team Rolex All American and first team college All American (Ye);
A five-time Rolex All American (twice as a first team choice) and, as a senior, America’s second-ranked junior player (Engleman);
A four-time first team Rolex All American and 2020 US Amateur champion (Zhang);
A first team Rolex All American as a sophomore and a US Amateur semifinalist as a freshman (Ganne);
A three-time Rolex All America, once as a first team choice (Seay);
and a two-time second team Rolex All American (Reyes).
By way of comparison, the Stackhouse national championship team had only three players who had ever had been named to a Rolex team, and only two, Casey Danielson and Shannon Aubert, who ever made the 12-player first team.
08-10-2020, 03:45 PM
(08-10-2020, 03:42 PM)Hulk01 Wrote: Stanford’s 2022 team:
A three-time, first team Rolex All American and US Amateur medalist (Heck);
A first team Rolex All American and first team college All American (Ye);
A five-time Rolex All American (twice as a first team choice) and, as a senior, America’s second-ranked junior player (Engleman);
A four-time first team Rolex All American and 2020 US Amateur champion (Zhang);
A first team Rolex All American as a sophomore and a US Amateur semifinalist as a freshman (Ganne);
A three-time Rolex All America, once as a first team choice (Seay);
and a two-time second team Rolex All American (Reyes).
By way of comparison, the Stackhouse national championship team had only three players who had ever had been named to a Rolex team, and only two, Casey Danielson and Shannon Aubert, who ever made the 12-player first team.
It's an impressive group, but they all have to come, though. As Bob noted, there is some concern about one or more going pro.
BC
(08-10-2020, 03:42 PM)Hulk01 Wrote: Stanford’s 2022 team:
A three-time, first team Rolex All American and US Amateur medalist (Heck);
A first team Rolex All American and first team college All American (Ye);
A five-time Rolex All American (twice as a first team choice) and, as a senior, America’s second-ranked junior player (Engleman);
A four-time first team Rolex All American and 2020 US Amateur champion (Zhang);
A first team Rolex All American as a sophomore and a US Amateur semifinalist as a freshman (Ganne);
A three-time Rolex All America, once as a first team choice (Seay);
and a two-time second team Rolex All American (Reyes).
By way of comparison, the Stackhouse national championship team had only three players who had ever had been named to a Rolex team, and only two, Casey Danielson and Shannon Aubert, who ever made the 12-player first team.
It's an impressive group, but they all have to come, though. As Bob noted, there is some concern about one or more going pro.
BC
08-10-2020, 06:13 PM
(08-10-2020, 03:45 PM)BostonCard Wrote: It's an impressive group, but they all have to come, though. As Bob noted, there is some concern about one or more going pro.
BC
all have to attend, and then they have to win. and the most talented teams don't always win. check out Oklahoma State in 2019. won team championship qualifying stroke play by 31 shots with 3 guys in the top 8 (not including Hovland). however they didn't make it to the finals, much less win it.
(08-10-2020, 03:45 PM)BostonCard Wrote: It's an impressive group, but they all have to come, though. As Bob noted, there is some concern about one or more going pro.
BC
all have to attend, and then they have to win. and the most talented teams don't always win. check out Oklahoma State in 2019. won team championship qualifying stroke play by 31 shots with 3 guys in the top 8 (not including Hovland). however they didn't make it to the finals, much less win it.
08-10-2020, 06:52 PM
The match play format has changed my notion of "a great season."
It's now a dominant regular season, a Pac 12 championship, a terrific showing in regionals,
and a strong performance in NCAAs, hoping that the gods are with us.
No question that the NCAA's new format robs some great teams--Oklahoma State men last year,
Cal men four (five?) seasons ago.
But I'm in favor of it; it produces great theater.
Ganne's comments make me think she'll be good for three years.
Stanford has been her life long dream.
Zhang, however, looks almost ready.
I assume the new WAGR rankings will have 5th or 6th in the world,
worst case.
It's now a dominant regular season, a Pac 12 championship, a terrific showing in regionals,
and a strong performance in NCAAs, hoping that the gods are with us.
No question that the NCAA's new format robs some great teams--Oklahoma State men last year,
Cal men four (five?) seasons ago.
But I'm in favor of it; it produces great theater.
Ganne's comments make me think she'll be good for three years.
Stanford has been her life long dream.
Zhang, however, looks almost ready.
I assume the new WAGR rankings will have 5th or 6th in the world,
worst case.
The match play format has changed my notion of "a great season."
It's now a dominant regular season, a Pac 12 championship, a terrific showing in regionals,
and a strong performance in NCAAs, hoping that the gods are with us.
No question that the NCAA's new format robs some great teams--Oklahoma State men last year,
Cal men four (five?) seasons ago.
But I'm in favor of it; it produces great theater.
Ganne's comments make me think she'll be good for three years.
Stanford has been her life long dream.
Zhang, however, looks almost ready.
I assume the new WAGR rankings will have 5th or 6th in the world,
worst case.
It's now a dominant regular season, a Pac 12 championship, a terrific showing in regionals,
and a strong performance in NCAAs, hoping that the gods are with us.
No question that the NCAA's new format robs some great teams--Oklahoma State men last year,
Cal men four (five?) seasons ago.
But I'm in favor of it; it produces great theater.
Ganne's comments make me think she'll be good for three years.
Stanford has been her life long dream.
Zhang, however, looks almost ready.
I assume the new WAGR rankings will have 5th or 6th in the world,
worst case.
08-10-2020, 08:40 PM
Krauter will be a part of that 2022 team as well and has already been an HM AA and 2nd team AA in her first two years at Stanford
Krauter will be a part of that 2022 team as well and has already been an HM AA and 2nd team AA in her first two years at Stanford
08-10-2020, 08:59 PM
I don't think it's been mentioned that Zhang played with an injured wrist all week, coach advised her to withdraw before it started. I'm guessing she's even better un-injured.
But the NY Times had a story today about the difficulty of trying to start a pro career at this particular time:
In Women’s Golf, Virus Upends the Typical Paths to a Pro Career
Would this make it more likely that she'll come to Stanford for at least a year?
But the NY Times had a story today about the difficulty of trying to start a pro career at this particular time:
In Women’s Golf, Virus Upends the Typical Paths to a Pro Career
Would this make it more likely that she'll come to Stanford for at least a year?
I don't think it's been mentioned that Zhang played with an injured wrist all week, coach advised her to withdraw before it started. I'm guessing she's even better un-injured.
But the NY Times had a story today about the difficulty of trying to start a pro career at this particular time:
In Women’s Golf, Virus Upends the Typical Paths to a Pro Career
Would this make it more likely that she'll come to Stanford for at least a year?
But the NY Times had a story today about the difficulty of trying to start a pro career at this particular time:
In Women’s Golf, Virus Upends the Typical Paths to a Pro Career
Would this make it more likely that she'll come to Stanford for at least a year?
08-10-2020, 09:48 PM
(08-10-2020, 06:20 AM)Hulk01 Wrote: Back in my golf days, a common recommendation in match play was to give your competitor a series of short putts, then force them to putt one. The thought behind it was your foe would be out of practice, and perhaps unsettled.
Coverage of everything has become very frustrating.
The Golf online site story today reports that Zhang is coming to Stanford this fall (no)
and that Ruffels' final missed putt was a six-footer. It was maybe 50 inches.
That was Walter Hagen's trick. He'd give any putt within four feet for the first 15 holes...but not for 16-18.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
(08-10-2020, 06:20 AM)Hulk01 Wrote: Back in my golf days, a common recommendation in match play was to give your competitor a series of short putts, then force them to putt one. The thought behind it was your foe would be out of practice, and perhaps unsettled.
Coverage of everything has become very frustrating.
The Golf online site story today reports that Zhang is coming to Stanford this fall (no)
and that Ruffels' final missed putt was a six-footer. It was maybe 50 inches.
That was Walter Hagen's trick. He'd give any putt within four feet for the first 15 holes...but not for 16-18.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
08-11-2020, 06:36 AM
(08-10-2020, 09:48 PM)Mick Wrote: That was Walter Hagen's trick. He'd give any putt within four feet for the first 15 holes...but not for 16-18.
not sure if the rule has changed since Hagen's day, but you can practice putt today after the hole has concluded and before the next hole starts. lots of opportunities to maintain feel of green even if short putts are being conceded right and left. lastly, a big assumption on the Hagen strategy, you need to make it to the 16th hole of the match to put the strategy into play.
(08-10-2020, 09:48 PM)Mick Wrote: That was Walter Hagen's trick. He'd give any putt within four feet for the first 15 holes...but not for 16-18.
not sure if the rule has changed since Hagen's day, but you can practice putt today after the hole has concluded and before the next hole starts. lots of opportunities to maintain feel of green even if short putts are being conceded right and left. lastly, a big assumption on the Hagen strategy, you need to make it to the 16th hole of the match to put the strategy into play.
08-11-2020, 09:27 AM
(08-11-2020, 06:36 AM)slide Wrote:(08-10-2020, 09:48 PM)Mick Wrote: That was Walter Hagen's trick. He'd give any putt within four feet for the first 15 holes...but not for 16-18.
not sure if the rule has changed since Hagen's day, but you can practice putt today after the hole has concluded and before the next hole starts. lots of opportunities to maintain feel of green even if short putts are being conceded right and left. lastly, a big assumption on the Hagen strategy, you need to make it to the 16th hole of the match to put the strategy into play.
Honestly, I don't think I'd feel comfortable practicing my short putts with another foursome ready to hit into the green. As for putting the strategy into play, either you'll need it or you won't. If you're way ahead or way behind, conceding short putts won't make much of a difference. But if you're ahead by a hole going into 16, it's a tremendous advantage.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
(08-11-2020, 06:36 AM)slide Wrote:(08-10-2020, 09:48 PM)Mick Wrote: That was Walter Hagen's trick. He'd give any putt within four feet for the first 15 holes...but not for 16-18.
not sure if the rule has changed since Hagen's day, but you can practice putt today after the hole has concluded and before the next hole starts. lots of opportunities to maintain feel of green even if short putts are being conceded right and left. lastly, a big assumption on the Hagen strategy, you need to make it to the 16th hole of the match to put the strategy into play.
Honestly, I don't think I'd feel comfortable practicing my short putts with another foursome ready to hit into the green. As for putting the strategy into play, either you'll need it or you won't. If you're way ahead or way behind, conceding short putts won't make much of a difference. But if you're ahead by a hole going into 16, it's a tremendous advantage.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
08-11-2020, 12:28 PM
(08-11-2020, 09:27 AM)Mick Wrote: Honestly, I don't think I'd feel comfortable practicing my short putts with another foursome ready to hit into the green. As for putting the strategy into play, either you'll need it or you won't. If you're way ahead or way behind, conceding short putts won't make much of a difference. But if you're ahead by a hole going into 16, it's a tremendous advantage.
yes, you pick your spots depending on pace of play and if you don't have the honors on the next box. generally I've found match play faster than stroke play due to concessions so usually there is a bit more time and other groups are doing the same thing you are.
on Hagen, he was pretty good at match play. at one point in the PGAs, he was something like 32 of 33 in 36 hole matches. since this thread started I've read more on these matches and the strategy was the concessions stopped by the 30th hole. everything from that point on had to be holed.
(08-11-2020, 09:27 AM)Mick Wrote: Honestly, I don't think I'd feel comfortable practicing my short putts with another foursome ready to hit into the green. As for putting the strategy into play, either you'll need it or you won't. If you're way ahead or way behind, conceding short putts won't make much of a difference. But if you're ahead by a hole going into 16, it's a tremendous advantage.
yes, you pick your spots depending on pace of play and if you don't have the honors on the next box. generally I've found match play faster than stroke play due to concessions so usually there is a bit more time and other groups are doing the same thing you are.
on Hagen, he was pretty good at match play. at one point in the PGAs, he was something like 32 of 33 in 36 hole matches. since this thread started I've read more on these matches and the strategy was the concessions stopped by the 30th hole. everything from that point on had to be holed.
Softball Fan
Unregistered
Unregistered
08-11-2020, 01:31 PM
If Wie is a role model for Zhang she may decide to play professionally ASAP while young and injury-free.
Or she may see the value of first getting a college degree because the length of a sports career can be cut short and she doesn't want to work at McDonalds after a career ending injury.
Or she may tell Stanford her projected professional earnings over four years is well in excess of $1million and demand Stanford pay her $1million to come to the farm and play on the team. Also demand NCAA do away with any rules involving amateurism.
Or she may see the value of first getting a college degree because the length of a sports career can be cut short and she doesn't want to work at McDonalds after a career ending injury.
Or she may tell Stanford her projected professional earnings over four years is well in excess of $1million and demand Stanford pay her $1million to come to the farm and play on the team. Also demand NCAA do away with any rules involving amateurism.
If Wie is a role model for Zhang she may decide to play professionally ASAP while young and injury-free.
Or she may see the value of first getting a college degree because the length of a sports career can be cut short and she doesn't want to work at McDonalds after a career ending injury.
Or she may tell Stanford her projected professional earnings over four years is well in excess of $1million and demand Stanford pay her $1million to come to the farm and play on the team. Also demand NCAA do away with any rules involving amateurism.
Or she may see the value of first getting a college degree because the length of a sports career can be cut short and she doesn't want to work at McDonalds after a career ending injury.
Or she may tell Stanford her projected professional earnings over four years is well in excess of $1million and demand Stanford pay her $1million to come to the farm and play on the team. Also demand NCAA do away with any rules involving amateurism.
08-12-2020, 03:54 PM
(08-11-2020, 12:28 PM)slide Wrote:(08-11-2020, 09:27 AM)Mick Wrote: Honestly, I don't think I'd feel comfortable practicing my short putts with another foursome ready to hit into the green. As for putting the strategy into play, either you'll need it or you won't. If you're way ahead or way behind, conceding short putts won't make much of a difference. But if you're ahead by a hole going into 16, it's a tremendous advantage.
yes, you pick your spots depending on pace of play and if you don't have the honors on the next box. generally I've found match play faster than stroke play due to concessions so usually there is a bit more time and other groups are doing the same thing you are.
on Hagen, he was pretty good at match play. at one point in the PGAs, he was something like 32 of 33 in 36 hole matches. since this thread started I've read more on these matches and the strategy was the concessions stopped by the 30th hole. everything from that point on had to be holed.
More than you ever wanted to know about conceding putts. Some highlights:
* First mention was "Rules of Golf" 1909 version.
* 18 years later, the British were blamed for it in Golf Illustrated
* If a golfer plays well when he's angry, concede the putts
* Friends rule - length to the grip. No exceptions, says a caddie.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/03/sport...e%20match.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
(08-11-2020, 12:28 PM)slide Wrote:(08-11-2020, 09:27 AM)Mick Wrote: Honestly, I don't think I'd feel comfortable practicing my short putts with another foursome ready to hit into the green. As for putting the strategy into play, either you'll need it or you won't. If you're way ahead or way behind, conceding short putts won't make much of a difference. But if you're ahead by a hole going into 16, it's a tremendous advantage.
yes, you pick your spots depending on pace of play and if you don't have the honors on the next box. generally I've found match play faster than stroke play due to concessions so usually there is a bit more time and other groups are doing the same thing you are.
on Hagen, he was pretty good at match play. at one point in the PGAs, he was something like 32 of 33 in 36 hole matches. since this thread started I've read more on these matches and the strategy was the concessions stopped by the 30th hole. everything from that point on had to be holed.
More than you ever wanted to know about conceding putts. Some highlights:
* First mention was "Rules of Golf" 1909 version.
* 18 years later, the British were blamed for it in Golf Illustrated
* If a golfer plays well when he's angry, concede the putts
* Friends rule - length to the grip. No exceptions, says a caddie.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/03/sport...e%20match.
Audaces fortuna iuvat
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »