(09-05-2021, 09:47 PM)Snorlax94 Wrote: (09-05-2021, 03:34 PM)Red80 Wrote: (09-05-2021, 12:09 PM)Hank 91 Wrote:
One more thing -- Prince's best album is Sign O' the Times.
I'd say his best was "1999".
Sigh, I kind of walked into that one. Even as I hit post, I was trying to think of a less subjective metaphor, or thinking I should at least restrict the example to be about commercial success, but I rushed it.
And as for all the comments on coaching hires, Shaw hired Coach Alamar, Coach Akina and Coach Carberry, and becoming the Ram's O-Line coach is clearly a promotion. Shaw also hired Coach Kennedy, and the receivers have been making spectacular catches that would be the envy of many teams, and Shaw promoted Morgan Turner into a Tight Ends coach, who has gone on to send a ton of players to the NFL. So I disagree with the false narrative that somehow all the great hires were by Harbaugh. If it's so easy, why aren't all teams 15-0? If Harbaugh is such a hiring magician, why is he on the hot seat at Michigan? And I would remind you that one of Harbaugh's best hires -- Vic Fangio -- came by reference from his brother.
I think many of Shaw's hires have been decent and some (Akina, possibly Alamar and Carberry) have been great, though I agree there are a few areas that should be improved.
Just a few additional comments on the coaching staff.
1) Alamar has been steady and has produced some excellent talents. Akina has been less steady, with some very good squads and some weak ones. He will turn 65 next month, Alamar is 60, so they aren't going anywhere but perhaps retirement.
2) I do not consider Carberry's tenure at Stanford a success: O-Line performance under his aegis (2018-2020) was a clear downgrade from the squads under Bloomgren. His accession to the O-Line coaching job at the LA Rams is technically a promotion (back with his pal, Sean McVay), but will he ever be offered an OC or head-coaching position? I doubt it.
3) I am not claiming that Harbaugh is perfect at hiring coordinators and assistants. But he did put together an excellent staff in his early years at Stanford, and they elevated the program to the heights we enjoyed in the first half of the last decade. And if Fangio was a tip from Harbaugh's brother, all the better. Use your network. It's how all top leaders do their hiring.
4) Shaw's coaching tree is essentially empty. Excellent coaches with elite assistants are constantly losing these people to bigger opportunities. Nobody is poaching Shaw's staff.
5) Finally, if Shaw has been so stellar at hiring, why are we seeing this steady degradation in performance, year by year? Ultimately, every football program is the product of the head coach and his staff (and, yes, other factors such as facilities, fan base, financial resources, historic and recent reputation of program, etc.). After the years 2009-2015, Stanford's reputation as a top-tier program was strong; but things began to go pear-shaped afterward; and ultimately, this all goes back to what the coach and his staff did or did not do.