[81alum]

The computer rankings don't mean a lot this early in the season, since they are still so heavily influenced by last season.  But for whatever it is worth:

The Massey ratings have Stanford at 7.  The two wins and the loss wound up not budging us a bit from our pre Bahamas ranking, as far as Massey's algorithm was concerned.

Tennessee hangs in at a surprising 8.  Their earlier win over South Florida looks pretty good.

South Carolina will stay at 1 until they lose, I think.  So we have two very difficult games on our December road trip.

In other rankings, South Florida climbs to 21, Texas to 5, Arizona at 2 since they have not lost yet, Indiana (never highly regarded by the computers) is at 22 just below S Florida. 

The Pac 12 is not doing well in Massey's rankings with only 3 in the top 20.  Oregon is 15, Colorado 28, Oregon State 31, Washington State 33, Utah 35, USC 48, UCLA fell 35 places to 55, ASU 60, Washington 65, Cal 67.  All pretty much garbage-in garbage-out ratings given the limited data.

The ratings do not account for the oversized influence of injuries on the handful of early outcomes, for example, which really affected us (although we did not know it at the time) and UCLA and Oregon, not to mention Maryland and Indiana.  When so many teams are playing without their best players, it takes even more credibility away from these rankings.


But they are what they are.  A vague indication of how teams are doing so far.

[81alum]

The computer rankings don't mean a lot this early in the season, since they are still so heavily influenced by last season.  But for whatever it is worth:

The Massey ratings have Stanford at 7.  The two wins and the loss wound up not budging us a bit from our pre Bahamas ranking, as far as Massey's algorithm was concerned.

Tennessee hangs in at a surprising 8.  Their earlier win over South Florida looks pretty good.

South Carolina will stay at 1 until they lose, I think.  So we have two very difficult games on our December road trip.

In other rankings, South Florida climbs to 21, Texas to 5, Arizona at 2 since they have not lost yet, Indiana (never highly regarded by the computers) is at 22 just below S Florida. 

The Pac 12 is not doing well in Massey's rankings with only 3 in the top 20.  Oregon is 15, Colorado 28, Oregon State 31, Washington State 33, Utah 35, USC 48, UCLA fell 35 places to 55, ASU 60, Washington 65, Cal 67.  All pretty much garbage-in garbage-out ratings given the limited data.

The ratings do not account for the oversized influence of injuries on the handful of early outcomes, for example, which really affected us (although we did not know it at the time) and UCLA and Oregon, not to mention Maryland and Indiana.  When so many teams are playing without their best players, it takes even more credibility away from these rankings.


But they are what they are.  A vague indication of how teams are doing so far.

[martyup]

At this point, the rankings are just a distraction.

[martyup]

At this point, the rankings are just a distraction.

[2006alum]

Tennessee hangs in at a surprising 8.  Their earlier win over South Florida looks pretty good.

South Carolina will stay at 1 until they lose, I think.  So we have two very difficult games on our December road trip.

Note that Tennessee has now beaten both of the teams we've lost to, Texas and USF (though their combined margin of victory was a mere 7 points and the Texas win was in OT). I think we thought Tennessee would be the warmup for Dawn but by the transitive property, at least, I now think there's a very realistic possibility we could end up with 4 losses before New Years. 

Hopefully Tara's gleaned much from the Bahamas trip (including that we really need to play Jump more), and she'll be ready to fine-tune things in the only two low-stakes games we have left this season before we head East again.

[2006alum]

Tennessee hangs in at a surprising 8.  Their earlier win over South Florida looks pretty good.

South Carolina will stay at 1 until they lose, I think.  So we have two very difficult games on our December road trip.

Note that Tennessee has now beaten both of the teams we've lost to, Texas and USF (though their combined margin of victory was a mere 7 points and the Texas win was in OT). I think we thought Tennessee would be the warmup for Dawn but by the transitive property, at least, I now think there's a very realistic possibility we could end up with 4 losses before New Years. 

Hopefully Tara's gleaned much from the Bahamas trip (including that we really need to play Jump more), and she'll be ready to fine-tune things in the only two low-stakes games we have left this season before we head East again.

[Hoops9092]

My top 10 would look something like this . . .

1. South Carolina (7-0; Beat UConn, NC State and Oregon)
2. Connecticut (3-1; Lone loss to South Carolina. Beat S. Florida)
3. NC State (6-1; Lone loss to South Carolina. Beat Maryland)
4. Stanford (5-2; Losses to Texas and S. Florida. Beat Indiana and Maryland)
5. Indiana (5-1; Lone loss to Stanford. Beat Kentucky)
6. Tennessee (6-0; Beat Texas and S. Florida)
7. Maryland (6-2; Losses to Stanford and NC State. Beat Baylor)
8. Arizona (7-0; Beat Louisville)
9. Baylor (6-1; Lone loss to Maryland. No notable wins yet)
10. Louisville (4-1; Lone loss to Arizona. No notable wins yet)

[Hoops9092]

My top 10 would look something like this . . .

1. South Carolina (7-0; Beat UConn, NC State and Oregon)
2. Connecticut (3-1; Lone loss to South Carolina. Beat S. Florida)
3. NC State (6-1; Lone loss to South Carolina. Beat Maryland)
4. Stanford (5-2; Losses to Texas and S. Florida. Beat Indiana and Maryland)
5. Indiana (5-1; Lone loss to Stanford. Beat Kentucky)
6. Tennessee (6-0; Beat Texas and S. Florida)
7. Maryland (6-2; Losses to Stanford and NC State. Beat Baylor)
8. Arizona (7-0; Beat Louisville)
9. Baylor (6-1; Lone loss to Maryland. No notable wins yet)
10. Louisville (4-1; Lone loss to Arizona. No notable wins yet)

[BostonCard]

I think you would have to put Tennessee ahead of Stanford, wouldn’t you?  The transitive rule doesn’t work in college sports, but in the absence of more information, you would have to pick a team that was 2-0 against common opponents and had no other losses over a team that was 0-2 against the same two teams.

BC

[BostonCard]

I think you would have to put Tennessee ahead of Stanford, wouldn’t you?  The transitive rule doesn’t work in college sports, but in the absence of more information, you would have to pick a team that was 2-0 against common opponents and had no other losses over a team that was 0-2 against the same two teams.

BC

[joemontes]

The computer rankings don't mean a lot this early in the season, since they are still so heavily influenced by last season.  But for whatever it is worth:

The Massey ratings have Stanford at 7.  The two wins and the loss wound up not budging us a bit from our pre Bahamas ranking, as far as Massey's algorithm was concerned.

Tennessee hangs in at a surprising 8.  Their earlier win over South Florida looks pretty good.

South Carolina will stay at 1 until they lose, I think.  So we have two very difficult games on our December road trip.

In other rankings, South Florida climbs to 21, Texas to 5, Arizona at 2 since they have not lost yet, Indiana (never highly regarded by the computers) is at 22 just below S Florida. 

The Pac 12 is not doing well in Massey's rankings with only 3 in the top 20.  Oregon is 15, Colorado 28, Oregon State 31, Washington State 33, Utah 35, USC 48, UCLA fell 35 places to 55, ASU 60, Washington 65, Cal 67.  All pretty much garbage-in garbage-out ratings given the limited data.

The ratings do not account for the oversized influence of injuries on the handful of early outcomes, for example, which really affected us (although we did not know it at the time) and UCLA and Oregon, not to mention Maryland and Indiana.  When so many teams are playing without their best players, it takes even more credibility away from these rankings.


But they are what they are.  A vague indication of how teams are doing so far.

Is the Massey's ratings in WBB similar to the Pablo rankings in WVB?

[joemontes]

The computer rankings don't mean a lot this early in the season, since they are still so heavily influenced by last season.  But for whatever it is worth:

The Massey ratings have Stanford at 7.  The two wins and the loss wound up not budging us a bit from our pre Bahamas ranking, as far as Massey's algorithm was concerned.

Tennessee hangs in at a surprising 8.  Their earlier win over South Florida looks pretty good.

South Carolina will stay at 1 until they lose, I think.  So we have two very difficult games on our December road trip.

In other rankings, South Florida climbs to 21, Texas to 5, Arizona at 2 since they have not lost yet, Indiana (never highly regarded by the computers) is at 22 just below S Florida. 

The Pac 12 is not doing well in Massey's rankings with only 3 in the top 20.  Oregon is 15, Colorado 28, Oregon State 31, Washington State 33, Utah 35, USC 48, UCLA fell 35 places to 55, ASU 60, Washington 65, Cal 67.  All pretty much garbage-in garbage-out ratings given the limited data.

The ratings do not account for the oversized influence of injuries on the handful of early outcomes, for example, which really affected us (although we did not know it at the time) and UCLA and Oregon, not to mention Maryland and Indiana.  When so many teams are playing without their best players, it takes even more credibility away from these rankings.


But they are what they are.  A vague indication of how teams are doing so far.

Is the Massey's ratings in WBB similar to the Pablo rankings in WVB?

[81alum]

Massey is a sports statistician and a professor of mathematics.  He does rankings for many sports here:

https://masseyratings.com/

His rankings were part of the basket of computer polls that used to be used in NCAA football, and are not far off the RPI system in basketball that is now defunct.

[81alum]

Massey is a sports statistician and a professor of mathematics.  He does rankings for many sports here:

https://masseyratings.com/

His rankings were part of the basket of computer polls that used to be used in NCAA football, and are not far off the RPI system in basketball that is now defunct.

[Hoops9092]

I think you would have to put Tennessee ahead of Stanford, wouldn’t you?  The transitive rule doesn’t work in college sports, but in the absence of more information, you would have to pick a team that was 2-0 against common opponents and had no other losses over a team that was 0-2 against the same two teams.

BC

Yeah I could understand that logic. 

I also think Stanford has 2 more signature wins, despite losing to 2 teams that Tennessee beat. Neither are in the top 10, like Maryland and Indiana are. It would be hard to see Tennessee jump into the top 5 from their current ranking but we shall see tomorrow.

[Hoops9092]

I think you would have to put Tennessee ahead of Stanford, wouldn’t you?  The transitive rule doesn’t work in college sports, but in the absence of more information, you would have to pick a team that was 2-0 against common opponents and had no other losses over a team that was 0-2 against the same two teams.

BC

Yeah I could understand that logic. 

I also think Stanford has 2 more signature wins, despite losing to 2 teams that Tennessee beat. Neither are in the top 10, like Maryland and Indiana are. It would be hard to see Tennessee jump into the top 5 from their current ranking but we shall see tomorrow.

[BostonCard]

I would expect Maryland to drop out of the top 10.  South Florida won’t climb enough to make it into the top-10 but they have wins over Stanford and Oregon, and their losses are to UConn and Tennessee.

BC

[BostonCard]

I would expect Maryland to drop out of the top 10.  South Florida won’t climb enough to make it into the top-10 but they have wins over Stanford and Oregon, and their losses are to UConn and Tennessee.

BC

[Baez87]

I appreciated ‘81’s analysis of the national ranking system for college basketball, and I take no issue with his pointing out the flaws in the system — I think he is correct in his assertions.
With that in mind, I still enjoy watching the various systems and attempting to anticipate their weekly results. And, since the AP poll is the de facto standard in ranking women’s basketball and it does influence the eventual pairings at tournament time, I think it bears watching.
I have heard Tara say numerous times that she doesn’t care about the ranking, that she spends her time coaching and preparing her team to win. I understand and appreciate that as well. Ranking are a diversion, they are a way for the fan to spend his or her idle time until the next game is played.
So, as I sit here in Nassau anticipating Monday’s version of the APs weekly ranking announcement, I find myself wondering how the ranking systems will reflect this week of multiple upsets.
Below I have listed the order of the major rankings, and I have made my predictions as well. My system in not mathematical and it is, admittedly, based on hunches and personal team preferences. I have listed last week’s rankings of the AP sports writers, the USA Today Coach’s Poll, and the Massey Poll (that ‘81 alluded to).
I will start with my own predictions:
# — ME — AP — CP — MASSEY
=========================
1 — SC — SC — SC — SC
2 — NS — MD — CN — AZ
3 — CN — CN — MD — NS
4 — BA — IU — NS — CN
5 — ST — NS — ST — TX
6 — MD — BA — IU — UN
7 — IU — ST — LU — ST
8 — AZ — IO — BA — TN
9 — IO — AZ — MI — BA
0 — LU — LU — TN — LU
I’m looking forward to the remaining games of the Stanford Women’s Basketball season! Come to the games and bring a friend. Win or lose, these women deserve our support.

[Baez87]

I appreciated ‘81’s analysis of the national ranking system for college basketball, and I take no issue with his pointing out the flaws in the system — I think he is correct in his assertions.
With that in mind, I still enjoy watching the various systems and attempting to anticipate their weekly results. And, since the AP poll is the de facto standard in ranking women’s basketball and it does influence the eventual pairings at tournament time, I think it bears watching.
I have heard Tara say numerous times that she doesn’t care about the ranking, that she spends her time coaching and preparing her team to win. I understand and appreciate that as well. Ranking are a diversion, they are a way for the fan to spend his or her idle time until the next game is played.
So, as I sit here in Nassau anticipating Monday’s version of the APs weekly ranking announcement, I find myself wondering how the ranking systems will reflect this week of multiple upsets.
Below I have listed the order of the major rankings, and I have made my predictions as well. My system in not mathematical and it is, admittedly, based on hunches and personal team preferences. I have listed last week’s rankings of the AP sports writers, the USA Today Coach’s Poll, and the Massey Poll (that ‘81 alluded to).
I will start with my own predictions:
# — ME — AP — CP — MASSEY
=========================
1 — SC — SC — SC — SC
2 — NS — MD — CN — AZ
3 — CN — CN — MD — NS
4 — BA — IU — NS — CN
5 — ST — NS — ST — TX
6 — MD — BA — IU — UN
7 — IU — ST — LU — ST
8 — AZ — IO — BA — TN
9 — IO — AZ — MI — BA
0 — LU — LU — TN — LU
I’m looking forward to the remaining games of the Stanford Women’s Basketball season! Come to the games and bring a friend. Win or lose, these women deserve our support.

[WBB fan]

I appreciated ‘81’s analysis of the national ranking system for college basketball, and I take no issue with his pointing out the flaws in the system — I think he is correct in his assertions.
With that in mind, I still enjoy watching the various systems and attempting to anticipate their weekly results. And, since the AP poll is the de facto standard in ranking women’s basketball and it does influence the eventual pairings at tournament time, I think it bears watching.
I have heard Tara say numerous times that she doesn’t care about the ranking, that she spends her time coaching and preparing her team to win. I understand and appreciate that as well. Ranking are a diversion, they are a way for the fan to spend his or her idle time until the next game is played.
So, as I sit here in Nassau anticipating Monday’s version of the APs weekly ranking announcement, I find myself wondering how the ranking systems will reflect this week of multiple upsets.
Below I have listed the order of the major rankings, and I have made my predictions as well. My system in not mathematical and it is, admittedly, based on hunches and personal team preferences. I have listed last week’s rankings of the AP sports writers, the USA Today Coach’s Poll, and the Massey Poll (that ‘81 alluded to).
I will start with my own predictions:
# — ME — AP — CP — MASSEY
=========================
1 — SC — SC — SC — SC
2 — NS — MD — CN — AZ
3 — CN — CN — MD — NS
4 — BA — IU — NS — CN
5 — ST — NS — ST — TX
6 — MD — BA — IU — UN
7 — IU — ST — LU — ST
8 — AZ — IO — BA — TN
9 — IO — AZ — MI — BA
0 — LU — LU — TN — LU
I’m looking forward to the remaining games of the Stanford Women’s Basketball season! Come to the games and bring a friend. Win or lose, these women deserve our support.

Fully endorse that "come to the games and bring a friend. Win or lose . . . "  Yes, Yes, yes!  Interesting that you see Az as going so high. They are going to be a tough challenge in the Pac-12

[WBB fan]

I appreciated ‘81’s analysis of the national ranking system for college basketball, and I take no issue with his pointing out the flaws in the system — I think he is correct in his assertions.
With that in mind, I still enjoy watching the various systems and attempting to anticipate their weekly results. And, since the AP poll is the de facto standard in ranking women’s basketball and it does influence the eventual pairings at tournament time, I think it bears watching.
I have heard Tara say numerous times that she doesn’t care about the ranking, that she spends her time coaching and preparing her team to win. I understand and appreciate that as well. Ranking are a diversion, they are a way for the fan to spend his or her idle time until the next game is played.
So, as I sit here in Nassau anticipating Monday’s version of the APs weekly ranking announcement, I find myself wondering how the ranking systems will reflect this week of multiple upsets.
Below I have listed the order of the major rankings, and I have made my predictions as well. My system in not mathematical and it is, admittedly, based on hunches and personal team preferences. I have listed last week’s rankings of the AP sports writers, the USA Today Coach’s Poll, and the Massey Poll (that ‘81 alluded to).
I will start with my own predictions:
# — ME — AP — CP — MASSEY
=========================
1 — SC — SC — SC — SC
2 — NS — MD — CN — AZ
3 — CN — CN — MD — NS
4 — BA — IU — NS — CN
5 — ST — NS — ST — TX
6 — MD — BA — IU — UN
7 — IU — ST — LU — ST
8 — AZ — IO — BA — TN
9 — IO — AZ — MI — BA
0 — LU — LU — TN — LU
I’m looking forward to the remaining games of the Stanford Women’s Basketball season! Come to the games and bring a friend. Win or lose, these women deserve our support.

Fully endorse that "come to the games and bring a friend. Win or lose . . . "  Yes, Yes, yes!  Interesting that you see Az as going so high. They are going to be a tough challenge in the Pac-12

[81alum]

And we move back up to 4 in the AP--previously 7th.  It looks like the press gave South Florida the upside and did not give us the downside of that game--our loss was apparently outweighed by two wins over top 10 teams.  If South Florida's buzzer beater rimmed out, I think we would have been at 2.



1 SC

2 NCS

3 UConn

4 Stanford

5 Baylor

6 Indiana

7 Arizona

8 Maryland

9 Iowa

10 Louisville

11 Tennessee



13 S Florida



15 Texas



18 Oregon



23 Oregon State

[81alum]

And we move back up to 4 in the AP--previously 7th.  It looks like the press gave South Florida the upside and did not give us the downside of that game--our loss was apparently outweighed by two wins over top 10 teams.  If South Florida's buzzer beater rimmed out, I think we would have been at 2.



1 SC

2 NCS

3 UConn

4 Stanford

5 Baylor

6 Indiana

7 Arizona

8 Maryland

9 Iowa

10 Louisville

11 Tennessee



13 S Florida



15 Texas



18 Oregon



23 Oregon State

[81alum]

Stanford also at 4 in the Coaches poll, so there is consensus on where we currently belong.

Coaches are very similar to AP except:

1) Big discrepancy for Louisville, 10th in the AP and 5th in Coaches.

2) Arizona 7th in AP and 11th in Coaches.

3) UCLA makes 24th in Coaches but didn't make the AP.

[81alum]

Stanford also at 4 in the Coaches poll, so there is consensus on where we currently belong.

Coaches are very similar to AP except:

1) Big discrepancy for Louisville, 10th in the AP and 5th in Coaches.

2) Arizona 7th in AP and 11th in Coaches.

3) UCLA makes 24th in Coaches but didn't make the AP.

[81alum]

This week we are up to 3 in both polls.  Still only 6th in Massey.

Pac-12 having a down year.  Arizona is ranked 4th in AP and 8th in coaches, Oregon is unranked in AP and 23rd in coaches, and not one else ranked at all.

Massey has Arizona at 5 over us--clearly placed a lot of weight on our two losses.  Oregon is 20th, WSU at 30th, Coloradao 33rd, Utah 36th, UCLA 41st, Oregon State 48th and the rest worse.

[81alum]

This week we are up to 3 in both polls.  Still only 6th in Massey.

Pac-12 having a down year.  Arizona is ranked 4th in AP and 8th in coaches, Oregon is unranked in AP and 23rd in coaches, and not one else ranked at all.

Massey has Arizona at 5 over us--clearly placed a lot of weight on our two losses.  Oregon is 20th, WSU at 30th, Coloradao 33rd, Utah 36th, UCLA 41st, Oregon State 48th and the rest worse.

[joemontes]

This week we are up to 3 in both polls.  Still only 6th in Massey.

Pac-12 having a down year.  Arizona is ranked 4th in AP and 8th in coaches, Oregon is unranked in AP and 23rd in coaches, and not one else ranked at all.

Massey has Arizona at 5 over us--clearly placed a lot of weight on our two losses.  Oregon is 20th, WSU at 30th, Coloradao 33rd, Utah 36th, UCLA 41st, Oregon State 48th and the rest worse.

Despite Arizona being ranked 4th in AP and 8th in Coaches, I'm not even worried about the possibility of 
Stanford losing to them. Same with regards to other pre-season upper echelon PAC 12 teams including
Oregon, Oregon State and UCLA.

Kind of weird, but the two teams that kind of worries me are Colorado and Utah.
Both seem to have the combination of players and team system that could give Stanford some problems.

[joemontes]

This week we are up to 3 in both polls.  Still only 6th in Massey.

Pac-12 having a down year.  Arizona is ranked 4th in AP and 8th in coaches, Oregon is unranked in AP and 23rd in coaches, and not one else ranked at all.

Massey has Arizona at 5 over us--clearly placed a lot of weight on our two losses.  Oregon is 20th, WSU at 30th, Coloradao 33rd, Utah 36th, UCLA 41st, Oregon State 48th and the rest worse.

Despite Arizona being ranked 4th in AP and 8th in Coaches, I'm not even worried about the possibility of 
Stanford losing to them. Same with regards to other pre-season upper echelon PAC 12 teams including
Oregon, Oregon State and UCLA.

Kind of weird, but the two teams that kind of worries me are Colorado and Utah.
Both seem to have the combination of players and team system that could give Stanford some problems.

[Maple Leaf]

This week we are up to 3 in both polls.  Still only 6th in Massey.

Pac-12 having a down year.  Arizona is ranked 4th in AP and 8th in coaches, Oregon is unranked in AP and 23rd in coaches, and not one else ranked at all.

Massey has Arizona at 5 over us--clearly placed a lot of weight on our two losses.  Oregon is 20th, WSU at 30th, Coloradao 33rd, Utah 36th, UCLA 41st, Oregon State 48th and the rest worse.

Despite Arizona being ranked 4th in AP and 8th in Coaches, I'm not even worried about the possibility of 
Stanford losing to them. Same with regards to other pre-season upper echelon PAC 12 teams including
Oregon, Oregon State and UCLA.

Kind of weird, but the two teams that kind of worries me are Colorado and Utah.
Both seem to have the combination of players and team system that could give Stanford some problems.

Colorado has been giving Stanford problems for the last two seasons.

[Maple Leaf]

This week we are up to 3 in both polls.  Still only 6th in Massey.

Pac-12 having a down year.  Arizona is ranked 4th in AP and 8th in coaches, Oregon is unranked in AP and 23rd in coaches, and not one else ranked at all.

Massey has Arizona at 5 over us--clearly placed a lot of weight on our two losses.  Oregon is 20th, WSU at 30th, Coloradao 33rd, Utah 36th, UCLA 41st, Oregon State 48th and the rest worse.

Despite Arizona being ranked 4th in AP and 8th in Coaches, I'm not even worried about the possibility of 
Stanford losing to them. Same with regards to other pre-season upper echelon PAC 12 teams including
Oregon, Oregon State and UCLA.

Kind of weird, but the two teams that kind of worries me are Colorado and Utah.
Both seem to have the combination of players and team system that could give Stanford some problems.

Colorado has been giving Stanford problems for the last two seasons.

[Card10Fan]

Georgia took down #2NC State tonight. If Stanford beats Tennessee Saturday could be looking at a #1 vs #2 matchup vs South Carolina.

[Card10Fan]

Georgia took down #2NC State tonight. If Stanford beats Tennessee Saturday could be looking at a #1 vs #2 matchup vs South Carolina.

[Lorcan]

If Arizona beats Texas on Sunday, I’d say they have a solid claim to #2, and could leapfrog Stanford.

[Lorcan]

If Arizona beats Texas on Sunday, I’d say they have a solid claim to #2, and could leapfrog Stanford.

[Card10Fan]

Tennessee is ranked #7. Texas is #11. 

Arizona is also #8 in the coaches poll and aside from them beating Louisville have played a very weak non conference schedule. I don't see them leapfrogging us in coaches or AP poll. However all meaningless unless we take care of business ourselves. Also polls are just polls so we shall see!

[Card10Fan]

Tennessee is ranked #7. Texas is #11. 

Arizona is also #8 in the coaches poll and aside from them beating Louisville have played a very weak non conference schedule. I don't see them leapfrogging us in coaches or AP poll. However all meaningless unless we take care of business ourselves. Also polls are just polls so we shall see!

[Maple Leaf]

Arizona vs Texas game per espn web site is shown as being cancelled.

[Maple Leaf]

Arizona vs Texas game per espn web site is shown as being cancelled.