(02-22-2022, 04:15 PM)teejers1 Wrote:(02-22-2022, 01:53 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:(02-22-2022, 01:06 PM)winflop Wrote:(02-22-2022, 11:02 AM)TooMuchTV Wrote:(02-22-2022, 09:04 AM)DC 86 Wrote: John and Patrick McEnroe are both tennis analysts for ESPN.
I'm pretty sure John McEnroe never graduated.
Although he didn't graduate, he is considered an alum. So is Tiger Woods
If they are good, they are an alum. If they are not, they are not an alum. I'm not sure I like that distinction, but that seems to be the by-and-large truth of the matter.
I thought "alum" was not defined as a graduate (much to my surprise); but rather, as one who attended the school.
So these all would be alums/alumni, whether we "like" them or not; however, not all would be graduates.
Is that right, or am I mis-remembering an earlier discussion here (and by earlier, I mean years and years ago).
From the SAA: https://alumni.stanford.edu/terms/
Quote:Alumnus/a is defined as a person who: has attended Stanford University as a student for at least three quarters in a degree-earning program. This does not include students and/or graduates of the Stanford Continuing Studies program.... Each of the Websites reserves the rights to define its alumni body at its own discretion.

