We have 2 fg in 15 minutes. Jones looks as if she wants to be elsewhere
WBB: Stanford 73 -- Colorado 62
02-23-2023, 03:34 PM
We are now shooting below 5% for the game (1/21).
At least we are outrebounding them and have 10 offensive rebounds (yeah, lots of chances there).
BC
At least we are outrebounding them and have 10 offensive rebounds (yeah, lots of chances there).
BC
We are now shooting below 5% for the game (1/21).
At least we are outrebounding them and have 10 offensive rebounds (yeah, lots of chances there).
BC
At least we are outrebounding them and have 10 offensive rebounds (yeah, lots of chances there).
BC
02-23-2023, 03:48 PM
I am trying to remember any game against Colorado that I would call "pretty basketball." But this is an uglier half than any I can remember. Reminiscent of how we played against JR Payne's Santa Clara in that ignominious loss a decade or so ago.
The good news is that a few treys have dropped, the deficit has narrowed, and the game is certainly within reach. But not unless we figure out how to play much better.
The good news is that a few treys have dropped, the deficit has narrowed, and the game is certainly within reach. But not unless we figure out how to play much better.
I am trying to remember any game against Colorado that I would call "pretty basketball." But this is an uglier half than any I can remember. Reminiscent of how we played against JR Payne's Santa Clara in that ignominious loss a decade or so ago.
The good news is that a few treys have dropped, the deficit has narrowed, and the game is certainly within reach. But not unless we figure out how to play much better.
The good news is that a few treys have dropped, the deficit has narrowed, and the game is certainly within reach. But not unless we figure out how to play much better.
02-23-2023, 03:49 PM
Well, that root canal of a half is now over. To be fair, it seems like we finally woke up in the last five or so minutes of the half. Still, when was the last time we had fewer than 20 points in a half?
BC
BC
Well, that root canal of a half is now over. To be fair, it seems like we finally woke up in the last five or so minutes of the half. Still, when was the last time we had fewer than 20 points in a half?
BC
BC
02-23-2023, 03:50 PM
(02-23-2023, 06:35 AM)81alum Wrote: Naturally, marketing and male bias dictate that the men get the prime time slot, and that relegates the women to the off-off-off slot of 2pm. That is 3pm local time.
If that is not balanced between men & women, is that a Title IX violation against the conference or the home team?
(02-23-2023, 06:35 AM)81alum Wrote: Naturally, marketing and male bias dictate that the men get the prime time slot, and that relegates the women to the off-off-off slot of 2pm. That is 3pm local time.
If that is not balanced between men & women, is that a Title IX violation against the conference or the home team?
Softball Fan
Unregistered
Unregistered
02-23-2023, 03:52 PM
This is the time of the season when a team should be firing on all cylinders. Stanford still has no idea what is the best starting line-up. That's not a criticism of Tara. IMO it's due to inconsistency of players. Very talented players who don't play up to potential throughout an entire game.
I still have a reasonable hope Stanford will win this game.
I still have a reasonable hope Stanford will win this game.
This is the time of the season when a team should be firing on all cylinders. Stanford still has no idea what is the best starting line-up. That's not a criticism of Tara. IMO it's due to inconsistency of players. Very talented players who don't play up to potential throughout an entire game.
I still have a reasonable hope Stanford will win this game.
I still have a reasonable hope Stanford will win this game.
02-23-2023, 03:54 PM
(02-23-2023, 03:50 PM)M T Wrote:Apparently not. I've seen the reports that are filed with the NCAA for Title IX compliance, and it is measured in terms of numbers of scholarships and other expenditures on the teams, not in terms of scheduling or revenues generated by the teams.(02-23-2023, 06:35 AM)81alum Wrote: Naturally, marketing and male bias dictate that the men get the prime time slot, and that relegates the women to the off-off-off slot of 2pm. That is 3pm local time.
If that is not balanced between men & women, is that a Title IX violation against the conference or the home team?
(02-23-2023, 03:50 PM)M T Wrote:Apparently not. I've seen the reports that are filed with the NCAA for Title IX compliance, and it is measured in terms of numbers of scholarships and other expenditures on the teams, not in terms of scheduling or revenues generated by the teams.(02-23-2023, 06:35 AM)81alum Wrote: Naturally, marketing and male bias dictate that the men get the prime time slot, and that relegates the women to the off-off-off slot of 2pm. That is 3pm local time.
If that is not balanced between men & women, is that a Title IX violation against the conference or the home team?
02-23-2023, 03:59 PM
(02-23-2023, 03:50 PM)M T Wrote:(02-23-2023, 06:35 AM)81alum Wrote: Naturally, marketing and male bias dictate that the men get the prime time slot, and that relegates the women to the off-off-off slot of 2pm. That is 3pm local time.
If that is not balanced between men & women, is that a Title IX violation against the conference or the home team?
If Team A average attendance is roughly 6,000+ and Team B average attendance is around 2,000, which team does common sense suggest should get the better time slot?
(02-23-2023, 03:50 PM)M T Wrote:(02-23-2023, 06:35 AM)81alum Wrote: Naturally, marketing and male bias dictate that the men get the prime time slot, and that relegates the women to the off-off-off slot of 2pm. That is 3pm local time.
If that is not balanced between men & women, is that a Title IX violation against the conference or the home team?
If Team A average attendance is roughly 6,000+ and Team B average attendance is around 2,000, which team does common sense suggest should get the better time slot?
02-23-2023, 04:01 PM
The most extreme stats for the first half:
Points in the paint: Stanford 4 Colorado 14
Brink: 0/4 with 2 fouls
FGs made: Stanford 6
Points in the paint: Stanford 4 Colorado 14
Brink: 0/4 with 2 fouls
FGs made: Stanford 6
02-23-2023, 04:01 PM
Brink with a +5 +/- in only 7 minutes. If she can manage her fouls the 2nd half, I like our odds. Colorado expended a lot of energy that first half and is missing a starter. Our bench played 42 minutes.
Colorado's Char Whittaker with 3 fouls in 1 minute of playing time. 120 fouls per 40 minutes pace.
Colorado's Char Whittaker with 3 fouls in 1 minute of playing time. 120 fouls per 40 minutes pace.
Brink with a +5 +/- in only 7 minutes. If she can manage her fouls the 2nd half, I like our odds. Colorado expended a lot of energy that first half and is missing a starter. Our bench played 42 minutes.
Colorado's Char Whittaker with 3 fouls in 1 minute of playing time. 120 fouls per 40 minutes pace.
Colorado's Char Whittaker with 3 fouls in 1 minute of playing time. 120 fouls per 40 minutes pace.
02-23-2023, 04:08 PM
Well, that's an improvement. First quarter, it took us until 1:14 left for us to score the first points of the quarter (the first field goal was scored with 12 seconds left). Second quarter, we scored our first points and field goal with 5:35 to go. Third quarter, it only took us until the 7:33 mark.
BC
BC
Well, that's an improvement. First quarter, it took us until 1:14 left for us to score the first points of the quarter (the first field goal was scored with 12 seconds left). Second quarter, we scored our first points and field goal with 5:35 to go. Third quarter, it only took us until the 7:33 mark.
BC
BC
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »