Posts: 12,181
Threads: 628
Joined: Dec 1969
09-20-2024, 11:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-20-2024, 11:44 PM by
fullmetal.)
Key plays of the game (out of order, going either way):
Leigber 71 yd pick six
Daniels INT, giving CUSE the ball that resulted in the Leigber pick six
Manley slipping and allowing the first CUSE TD (67 yd)
Davis Jr had a 47 yd run that set up a STAN FG (blunted by OL holding)
That STAN FG was a 51 yd kick from Kenney
Daniels INT, returned to the STAN23, where the defense held and forced a FG
STAN OL holding call wiped out a TD and resulted in a 38 yd Kenney FG
David Bailey forced an early 2Q fumble, but CUSE recovered
Green INT on the first play of CUSE's first possession in the 4Q, textbook DB play
Converted both 4th down attempts (one drive ended in a Daniels INT)
Leigber missed his sack of McCord at the end of the 3Q, allowing McCord to run free for a 19 yd TD
Ayomanor's leaping 1Q TD catch, high pointing with one hand into the end zone
CUSE ball, 3rd and 17 from the 50 yd line with 4:45 left in the game and down six, McCord completes a 26 yd pass on TD drive to take the lead
4th and 9 from CUSE45, down one point with 20 sec left in the game...and Daniels zips it to Ayomanor for 27 yds.
Kenney's game-winning FG as time expires.
For both teams, it was generally true that sacks and tackles for loss were good predictors for punts (and FGs if close to the opponent's endzone). I think both teams just don't have the explosive consistency to overcome the loss of down or tempo. Penalties were a little less of a drive killer, but still painful enough, wiping out good plays.
Facepalm moment: besides all the holding penalties, Stanford's 3rd and 30 from their own 17 yd line...definitely a record-scratch-you-might-be-wondering-how-we-got-here moment. Oh, and Daniels taking what seemed like 10-15 sec in the pocket (kudos to OL), only to throw the ball away.
Defense notched 4 sacks and 7 TFLs...great start to the ACC campaign. (CUSE with 1 sack and 6 TFLs.)