[cardcoug]

Looking over the BCS standings, it seems to have boiled down to the following pretty simple situation:

(a) win, and its roses.
(b) beat UCLA in LA, lose in PA. impossible.
© lose and Clemson beats the So. Car. Gamecocks, and we're out.
(d) lose and Clemson loses, its tostitos.

No?

[cardcoug]

Looking over the BCS standings, it seems to have boiled down to the following pretty simple situation:

(a) win, and its roses.
(b) beat UCLA in LA, lose in PA. impossible.
© lose and Clemson beats the So. Car. Gamecocks, and we're out.
(d) lose and Clemson loses, its tostitos.

No?

[Cardinal96]

Looking over the BCS standings, it seems to have boiled down to the following pretty simple situation:

(a) win, and its roses.
(b) beat UCLA in LA, lose in PA. impossible.
© lose and Clemson beats the So. Car. Gamecocks, and we're out.
(d) lose and Clemson loses, its tostitos.

No?

I think that might be right.  A loss by Clemson likely moves them out of the BCS top 14.

The one caveat is if UCLA beats Oregon in the Pac 12 title game.  In that case, UCLA is in Pasadena and Oregon is eating Tostitos.

[Cardinal96]

Looking over the BCS standings, it seems to have boiled down to the following pretty simple situation:

(a) win, and its roses.
(b) beat UCLA in LA, lose in PA. impossible.
© lose and Clemson beats the So. Car. Gamecocks, and we're out.
(d) lose and Clemson loses, its tostitos.

No?

I think that might be right.  A loss by Clemson likely moves them out of the BCS top 14.

The one caveat is if UCLA beats Oregon in the Pac 12 title game.  In that case, UCLA is in Pasadena and Oregon is eating Tostitos.