Posts: 2,790
Threads: 146
Joined: Jan 2014
11-08-2020, 11:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2020, 11:24 PM by
Papa John.)
OK, I'll bite, too. I have no idea how Shaw would have done in 2007. He did recruit Andrew Luck as Harbaugh's assistant. In fact, here's the national and conference ranking for Stanford's recruiting since 2000 per 247sports.
2000-2001, Ty Willingham
#11 national, #1 Pac-10
#14, #2
2002-2004, Buddy Teevens
#32, #5
#26, #5
#60, #10
2005-2006, Walt Harris
#24, #5
#63, #10
2007-2010, Jim Harbaugh
#51, #7
#47, #8
#21, #3
#25, #6
2011-present, David Shaw (Pac-12)
#22, #4
#7, #1
#52, #11
#13, #2
#24, #5
#16, #3
#14, #2
#40, #7
#19, #3
#21, #3
Some of those poorer rankings are due to comparatively small class sizes. Having said that, there are 65 power five teams plus UND. So an average recruiting class would rank somewhere in the low 30s. I would consider elite to be top 10, very good to be 11-20, good to be 21-30. Shaw's recruiting classes are, for the most part, good to very good, and that's not acknowledging certain disadvantages (and advantages) that one has in trying to get recruits to commit to Stanford. The 2021 recruiting class may well be the poorest of Shaw's era, and that's a bad sign, but he's more than earned the right to turn it around in 2022.
As for Shaw's game-planning and in-game coaching, I doubt he's well below average, which would make him the 50th best game-planner and in-game coach in the power five.
Let me put it another way, if you could swap David Shaw with a current Pac-12 head coach, who would it be? Whittingham at Utah? Edwards at ASU? Yeah, maybe one of those two. Wilcox at Cal? In three years as HC, he has yet to produce a winning conference record. Cristobal? Helton? Kelly? They're at big-time programs and have experienced success, but do you think they would thrive under Stanford's recruiting rubrics? Nothing against the others--Dorrell, Rolovich, Sumlin, Lake, Smith--but they haven't produced anything close to Shaw's resume.
At some point, the argument needs to evolve beyond "Shaw stinks at everything." Tell me who--besides Harbaugh, who's not coming back!--would consider a coaching offer at Stanford and would do a better job than Shaw?
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)