10-20-2020, 10:20 PM
At 60 Minutes my nickname was Captain Grumpy.
(12-12-2020, 06:47 PM)lex24 Wrote: I boycotted NBA over the Hong Kong incident. Maybe I’ll watch this year. Watched a ton of baseball. And fair amount of football. The games bring some escape. We (or at least I) need that.
(12-12-2020, 06:47 PM)lex24 Wrote: I boycotted NBA over the Hong Kong incident. Maybe I’ll watch this year. Watched a ton of baseball. And fair amount of football. The games bring some escape. We (or at least I) need that.
(12-12-2020, 07:47 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(12-12-2020, 06:47 PM)lex24 Wrote: I boycotted NBA over the Hong Kong incident. Maybe I’ll watch this year. Watched a ton of baseball. And fair amount of football. The games bring some escape. We (or at least I) need that.
Yeah, that was a weird bit of sycophancy by the NBA. I don’t have an issue with NBA stars protesting police brutality in the US, not so I expect the league to protest Chinese autocracy. But the league rolling over after the CCP’s protest about what an NBA GM accurately commented about what happened in China was sickening.
BC
(12-12-2020, 07:47 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(12-12-2020, 06:47 PM)lex24 Wrote: I boycotted NBA over the Hong Kong incident. Maybe I’ll watch this year. Watched a ton of baseball. And fair amount of football. The games bring some escape. We (or at least I) need that.
Yeah, that was a weird bit of sycophancy by the NBA. I don’t have an issue with NBA stars protesting police brutality in the US, not so I expect the league to protest Chinese autocracy. But the league rolling over after the CCP’s protest about what an NBA GM accurately commented about what happened in China was sickening.
BC
(10-19-2020, 07:09 PM)Snorlax94 Wrote:(10-19-2020, 01:56 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote:Football is the biggest fish in a much, much smaller broadcast pond. If this keeps up, the sports industry will not be able to maintain its current cost level. Who cares if you are still #1 in broadcast if 60% fewer people are watching and have switched to streaming.(10-19-2020, 01:40 PM)BostonCard Wrote:Quote:According to data compiled by Sports Media Watch, golf's U.S. Open was
down 42 percent. The Kentucky Derby: 43 percent. The Stanley Cup
finals: 61 percent. The vaunted NFL is down 13 percent early in its
season. MLB's division series were down 40 percent. A World Series
between, potentially, Atlanta and Tampa Bay isn't likely to change the
tide.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/20...-politics/
(may be behind a paywall)
BC
I think this article has the source data. https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2020/10...iewership/
Even with the drop in viewership, I think I saw a report that all 15 of the most watched shows so far during the fall season are NFL games. Sports continues to deliver a bigger audience than other shows to advertisers. The doom and gloomers expecting the rights fees for sports broadcasts to collapse will be disappointed.
It’ll be interesting to see what happens in 2021 and 2022. To some extent, the drop demonstrates the loss of water cooler banter about sports and watching games with friends, and taking kids especially when the kids play those sports. That part should come back eventually.
But streaming services have done a remarkable job this year delivering the goods. I could see myself watching less sports in the future, though I am really looking forward to when I can return to Stanford Football in-person.
(10-19-2020, 07:09 PM)Snorlax94 Wrote:(10-19-2020, 01:56 PM)Spiny_Norman Wrote:Football is the biggest fish in a much, much smaller broadcast pond. If this keeps up, the sports industry will not be able to maintain its current cost level. Who cares if you are still #1 in broadcast if 60% fewer people are watching and have switched to streaming.(10-19-2020, 01:40 PM)BostonCard Wrote:Quote:According to data compiled by Sports Media Watch, golf's U.S. Open was
down 42 percent. The Kentucky Derby: 43 percent. The Stanley Cup
finals: 61 percent. The vaunted NFL is down 13 percent early in its
season. MLB's division series were down 40 percent. A World Series
between, potentially, Atlanta and Tampa Bay isn't likely to change the
tide.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/20...-politics/
(may be behind a paywall)
BC
I think this article has the source data. https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2020/10...iewership/
Even with the drop in viewership, I think I saw a report that all 15 of the most watched shows so far during the fall season are NFL games. Sports continues to deliver a bigger audience than other shows to advertisers. The doom and gloomers expecting the rights fees for sports broadcasts to collapse will be disappointed.
It’ll be interesting to see what happens in 2021 and 2022. To some extent, the drop demonstrates the loss of water cooler banter about sports and watching games with friends, and taking kids especially when the kids play those sports. That part should come back eventually.
But streaming services have done a remarkable job this year delivering the goods. I could see myself watching less sports in the future, though I am really looking forward to when I can return to Stanford Football in-person.
(12-12-2020, 07:47 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(12-12-2020, 06:47 PM)lex24 Wrote: I boycotted NBA over the Hong Kong incident. Maybe I’ll watch this year. Watched a ton of baseball. And fair amount of football. The games bring some escape. We (or at least I) need that.
Yeah, that was a weird bit of sycophancy by the NBA. I don’t have an issue with NBA stars protesting police brutality in the US, not so I expect the league to protest Chinese autocracy. But the league rolling over after the CCP’s protest about what an NBA GM accurately commented about what happened in China was sickening.
BC
(12-12-2020, 07:47 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(12-12-2020, 06:47 PM)lex24 Wrote: I boycotted NBA over the Hong Kong incident. Maybe I’ll watch this year. Watched a ton of baseball. And fair amount of football. The games bring some escape. We (or at least I) need that.
Yeah, that was a weird bit of sycophancy by the NBA. I don’t have an issue with NBA stars protesting police brutality in the US, not so I expect the league to protest Chinese autocracy. But the league rolling over after the CCP’s protest about what an NBA GM accurately commented about what happened in China was sickening.
BC
(12-13-2020, 10:08 AM)Mick Wrote:(12-12-2020, 07:47 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(12-12-2020, 06:47 PM)lex24 Wrote: I boycotted NBA over the Hong Kong incident. Maybe I’ll watch this year. Watched a ton of baseball. And fair amount of football. The games bring some escape. We (or at least I) need that.
Yeah, that was a weird bit of sycophancy by the NBA. I don’t have an issue with NBA stars protesting police brutality in the US, not so I expect the league to protest Chinese autocracy. But the league rolling over after the CCP’s protest about what an NBA GM accurately commented about what happened in China was sickening.
BC
Watching noted vocal progressive Steve Kerr roll over for China was particularly nauseating, second only to his prevaricating on the reasons why he flopped on his back to show his belly.
https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/warrio...third-rail
(12-13-2020, 10:08 AM)Mick Wrote:(12-12-2020, 07:47 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(12-12-2020, 06:47 PM)lex24 Wrote: I boycotted NBA over the Hong Kong incident. Maybe I’ll watch this year. Watched a ton of baseball. And fair amount of football. The games bring some escape. We (or at least I) need that.
Yeah, that was a weird bit of sycophancy by the NBA. I don’t have an issue with NBA stars protesting police brutality in the US, not so I expect the league to protest Chinese autocracy. But the league rolling over after the CCP’s protest about what an NBA GM accurately commented about what happened in China was sickening.
BC
Watching noted vocal progressive Steve Kerr roll over for China was particularly nauseating, second only to his prevaricating on the reasons why he flopped on his back to show his belly.
https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/warrio...third-rail
Quote:Through the first 13 weeks of the season, TV and digital NFL ratings were down 7% across the broadcast and cable networks that carry games, according to Nielsen data. Viewership among men in the 18-49 and 25-54 age categories that advertisers target during games was more significantly affected.
Quote:Through the first 13 weeks of the season, TV and digital NFL ratings were down 7% across the broadcast and cable networks that carry games, according to Nielsen data. Viewership among men in the 18-49 and 25-54 age categories that advertisers target during games was more significantly affected.
(12-14-2020, 02:49 PM)ColoradoTree Wrote: Like some others, I was really surprised when the early ratings numbers came in showing big drops in viewership. I watched a lot of NBA bubble playoffs and every minute of the Finals. I watched every single Twins game this year on MLB.TV and a lot more random MLB postseason games that I wouldn't have tuned into normally (and I watched several KBO games when that was the only thing going). Now, my football viewing habits have dropped off significantly, and while I normally would've watched every Stanford game, I've missed a couple this year because the season just don't seem all that real to me. Whether it's because the season is shorter, schedules are limited, teams are forced to either cancel games or play with dozens of players out, or because of the different limitations faced by different teams around the country, there's a sense of legitimacy that feels lacking from this year's college football season. And with that gone, I can't shake the feeling that it just doesn't matter, so why invest those hours?
My NFL fandom had already been waning, and perhaps the reality check of covid heightened some of the concerns. I cherished MLB and the NBA bubble as an escape this past year, but I haven't watched a full NFL game this entire season. The desire to do so is just totally lacking.
As for soccer, the seeming greater availability of high-level European club games hasn't changed my viewing habits, but that's not because I don't like soccer, it's because I'm a complete homer when it comes to most sports viewership. I'm a Bundesliga guy in general, and a Hertha guy in particular, so I don't much care if Arsenal-Chelsea or Barca-Real Madrid is on. Happy to catch highlights, of course, but I'm just not watching a match start to finish unless it's my team. That's generally true of all sports for me, with playoffs being the primary exception.
Quick aside: the Lakers were absolutely deserving champs, and there should be no asterisk there. Same thing with the Dodgers--the expanded playoffs created even more hurdles for a great regular season like that (the idea that a runaway division winner could be out of the postseason after two games is abhorrent and I hope that idea is forever banished from the minds of the MLB powers that be), and they did the thing. The 2020 sports seasons will be fascinating conversation topics for years to come, but not in the sense of titles having asterisks, I don't think. (I think a big part of that, at least with the Lakers and Dodgers, is that both of those teams were expected to do very well--if an 8 seed in the bubble had run the table, or if one of those 3rd-place-in-their-division baseball teams had pulled a rabbit out of their hat, it's absolutely a different story.)
(12-14-2020, 02:49 PM)ColoradoTree Wrote: Like some others, I was really surprised when the early ratings numbers came in showing big drops in viewership. I watched a lot of NBA bubble playoffs and every minute of the Finals. I watched every single Twins game this year on MLB.TV and a lot more random MLB postseason games that I wouldn't have tuned into normally (and I watched several KBO games when that was the only thing going). Now, my football viewing habits have dropped off significantly, and while I normally would've watched every Stanford game, I've missed a couple this year because the season just don't seem all that real to me. Whether it's because the season is shorter, schedules are limited, teams are forced to either cancel games or play with dozens of players out, or because of the different limitations faced by different teams around the country, there's a sense of legitimacy that feels lacking from this year's college football season. And with that gone, I can't shake the feeling that it just doesn't matter, so why invest those hours?
My NFL fandom had already been waning, and perhaps the reality check of covid heightened some of the concerns. I cherished MLB and the NBA bubble as an escape this past year, but I haven't watched a full NFL game this entire season. The desire to do so is just totally lacking.
As for soccer, the seeming greater availability of high-level European club games hasn't changed my viewing habits, but that's not because I don't like soccer, it's because I'm a complete homer when it comes to most sports viewership. I'm a Bundesliga guy in general, and a Hertha guy in particular, so I don't much care if Arsenal-Chelsea or Barca-Real Madrid is on. Happy to catch highlights, of course, but I'm just not watching a match start to finish unless it's my team. That's generally true of all sports for me, with playoffs being the primary exception.
Quick aside: the Lakers were absolutely deserving champs, and there should be no asterisk there. Same thing with the Dodgers--the expanded playoffs created even more hurdles for a great regular season like that (the idea that a runaway division winner could be out of the postseason after two games is abhorrent and I hope that idea is forever banished from the minds of the MLB powers that be), and they did the thing. The 2020 sports seasons will be fascinating conversation topics for years to come, but not in the sense of titles having asterisks, I don't think. (I think a big part of that, at least with the Lakers and Dodgers, is that both of those teams were expected to do very well--if an 8 seed in the bubble had run the table, or if one of those 3rd-place-in-their-division baseball teams had pulled a rabbit out of their hat, it's absolutely a different story.)
(12-14-2020, 02:49 PM)ColoradoTree Wrote: Quick aside: the Lakers were absolutely deserving champs, and there should be no asterisk there. Same thing with the Dodgers--the expanded playoffs created even more hurdles for a great regular season like that (the idea that a runaway division winner could be out of the postseason after two games is abhorrent and I hope that idea is forever banished from the minds of the MLB powers that be), and they did the thing. The 2020 sports seasons will be fascinating conversation topics for years to come, but not in the sense of titles having asterisks, I don't think. (I think a big part of that, at least with the Lakers and Dodgers, is that both of those teams were expected to do very well--if an 8 seed in the bubble had run the table, or if one of those 3rd-place-in-their-division baseball teams had pulled a rabbit out of their hat, it's absolutely a different story.)
(12-14-2020, 02:49 PM)ColoradoTree Wrote: Quick aside: the Lakers were absolutely deserving champs, and there should be no asterisk there. Same thing with the Dodgers--the expanded playoffs created even more hurdles for a great regular season like that (the idea that a runaway division winner could be out of the postseason after two games is abhorrent and I hope that idea is forever banished from the minds of the MLB powers that be), and they did the thing. The 2020 sports seasons will be fascinating conversation topics for years to come, but not in the sense of titles having asterisks, I don't think. (I think a big part of that, at least with the Lakers and Dodgers, is that both of those teams were expected to do very well--if an 8 seed in the bubble had run the table, or if one of those 3rd-place-in-their-division baseball teams had pulled a rabbit out of their hat, it's absolutely a different story.)
(12-14-2020, 11:26 PM)pefloresjr Wrote: Nope. Real championships are earned through a real season, not an exhibition season with a bunch of wacky rules. Both those teams were clearly very talented but didn't earn real titles. *Champsterisks*
If I were a fan of the teams, I would claim it, but it isn't a real title. I'll even cop to the fact that "We've got the Axeterisk!" because neither team had to/was able to play a full season.
Cheers,
Pete F.
(12-14-2020, 11:26 PM)pefloresjr Wrote: Nope. Real championships are earned through a real season, not an exhibition season with a bunch of wacky rules. Both those teams were clearly very talented but didn't earn real titles. *Champsterisks*
If I were a fan of the teams, I would claim it, but it isn't a real title. I'll even cop to the fact that "We've got the Axeterisk!" because neither team had to/was able to play a full season.
Cheers,
Pete F.