09-11-2021, 10:55 PM
U$C game thread
09-11-2021, 10:56 PM
Looks like McKee fixed whatever it was that was a problem when behind center.
BC
BC
Looks like McKee fixed whatever it was that was a problem when behind center.
BC
BC
09-11-2021, 11:01 PM
(09-11-2021, 10:54 PM)PVTree Wrote:(09-11-2021, 10:51 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Why didn’t SC go for two?
BC
20 looks better than 19.
If they score 3 more TDs, the condoms will go for 2. No need to do so now.
Yes, but if you don’t get the two point conversion this time, you have a chance to get two point conversions on the next two Td’s to make up for it. If you go for two when you are down eight, and you don’t get it, you wind up two points short.
It’s academic given that they had to score four times in the fourth, but still.
BC
(09-11-2021, 10:54 PM)PVTree Wrote:(09-11-2021, 10:51 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Why didn’t SC go for two?
BC
20 looks better than 19.
If they score 3 more TDs, the condoms will go for 2. No need to do so now.
Yes, but if you don’t get the two point conversion this time, you have a chance to get two point conversions on the next two Td’s to make up for it. If you go for two when you are down eight, and you don’t get it, you wind up two points short.
It’s academic given that they had to score four times in the fourth, but still.
BC
09-11-2021, 11:01 PM
Who here would trade McKee for Slovis? Helton for Shaw?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-11-2021, 11:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-11-2021, 11:03 PM by BostonCard.)
Damned, Tremayne shoulda caught that. He cost us our chance at 49.
Also, amazing that Karty hit pretty much the top of the upright from 49 yards out. Had it been straighter, he could have hit it from 59.
BC
Also, amazing that Karty hit pretty much the top of the upright from 49 yards out. Had it been straighter, he could have hit it from 59.
BC
(This post was last modified: 09-11-2021, 11:03 PM by BostonCard.)
Damned, Tremayne shoulda caught that. He cost us our chance at 49.
Also, amazing that Karty hit pretty much the top of the upright from 49 yards out. Had it been straighter, he could have hit it from 59.
BC
Also, amazing that Karty hit pretty much the top of the upright from 49 yards out. Had it been straighter, he could have hit it from 59.
BC
09-11-2021, 11:03 PM
(09-11-2021, 11:01 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(09-11-2021, 10:54 PM)PVTree Wrote:(09-11-2021, 10:51 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Why didn’t SC go for two?
BC
20 looks better than 19.
If they score 3 more TDs, the condoms will go for 2. No need to do so now.
Yes, but if you don’t get the two point conversion this time, you have a chance to get two point conversions on the next two Td’s to make up for it. If you go for two when you are down eight, and you don’t get it, you wind up two points short.
It’s academic given that they had to score four times in the fourth, but still.
BC
Karty has the strongest leg I've ever seen from a Stanford PK
(09-11-2021, 11:01 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(09-11-2021, 10:54 PM)PVTree Wrote:(09-11-2021, 10:51 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Why didn’t SC go for two?
BC
20 looks better than 19.
If they score 3 more TDs, the condoms will go for 2. No need to do so now.
Yes, but if you don’t get the two point conversion this time, you have a chance to get two point conversions on the next two Td’s to make up for it. If you go for two when you are down eight, and you don’t get it, you wind up two points short.
It’s academic given that they had to score four times in the fourth, but still.
BC
Karty has the strongest leg I've ever seen from a Stanford PK
09-11-2021, 11:04 PM
(09-11-2021, 11:01 PM)martyup Wrote: Who here would trade McKee for Slovis? Helton for Shaw?
Even when I’ve been the most down on Shaw, I’ve never wished Stanford could get Helton. Since Day 1 of Helton’s tenure, I’ve been happy to see U$C held back by its uninspiring head coach.
When I registered here in 2014, TrumpCard seemed like an apolitical user ID...
(09-11-2021, 11:01 PM)martyup Wrote: Who here would trade McKee for Slovis? Helton for Shaw?
Even when I’ve been the most down on Shaw, I’ve never wished Stanford could get Helton. Since Day 1 of Helton’s tenure, I’ve been happy to see U$C held back by its uninspiring head coach.
When I registered here in 2014, TrumpCard seemed like an apolitical user ID...
09-11-2021, 11:04 PM
Defenders are pinning their ears back. The tackles are much more solid.
BC
BC
Defenders are pinning their ears back. The tackles are much more solid.
BC
BC
09-11-2021, 11:05 PM
We were 17 point dogs coming into this. So we beat the spread by 39?
How does this rank among underdog wins by Stanford?
How does this rank among underdog wins by Stanford?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
Yeah, I’m happy for Helton to be just good enough not to be fired.
BC
BC
09-11-2021, 11:06 PM
(09-11-2021, 11:03 PM)Madera86 Wrote: So, I guess this is what execution looks like? Hmm. Well, I'm all for it.
Reminds me of my favorite John McKay line — not from his days at USC but when he was coaching the Tampa bay Buccaneers and found out how tough life could be when your team’s talent wasn’t so much better than the opponents’ teams. He was asked after a game what he thought of the execution of his team’s offense, and he opined that that was a pretty good idea.
(09-11-2021, 11:03 PM)Madera86 Wrote: So, I guess this is what execution looks like? Hmm. Well, I'm all for it.
Reminds me of my favorite John McKay line — not from his days at USC but when he was coaching the Tampa bay Buccaneers and found out how tough life could be when your team’s talent wasn’t so much better than the opponents’ teams. He was asked after a game what he thought of the execution of his team’s offense, and he opined that that was a pretty good idea.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »