01-01-2022, 04:40 PM
You have to see it to believe it.
(01-01-2022, 08:06 PM)Beeg_Dawg Wrote: Amazing. The entire first half played without any defense.
Entertaining, much more fun than the pathetic playoff games.
(01-01-2022, 08:06 PM)Beeg_Dawg Wrote: Amazing. The entire first half played without any defense.
Entertaining, much more fun than the pathetic playoff games.
(01-02-2022, 10:47 AM)BostonCard Wrote: Yeah, while the playoff games were snoozefests, the “meaningless” Rose Bowl was a ton of fun to watch, and I’m sure Ohio State and Utah fans didn’t consider it meaningless. Obviously, the problem is that it is hard to know in advance which bowl games are going to be great and which will be lousy, but I think this one goes to show why I think it would be a mistake to expand the playoffs and do away with non-playoff bowl games.
BC
(01-02-2022, 10:47 AM)BostonCard Wrote: Yeah, while the playoff games were snoozefests, the “meaningless” Rose Bowl was a ton of fun to watch, and I’m sure Ohio State and Utah fans didn’t consider it meaningless. Obviously, the problem is that it is hard to know in advance which bowl games are going to be great and which will be lousy, but I think this one goes to show why I think it would be a mistake to expand the playoffs and do away with non-playoff bowl games.
BC
(01-02-2022, 10:47 AM)BostonCard Wrote: Yeah, while the playoff games were snoozefests, the “meaningless” Rose Bowl was a ton of fun to watch, and I’m sure Ohio State and Utah fans didn’t consider it meaningless. Obviously, the problem is that it is hard to know in advance which bowl games are going to be great and which will be lousy, but I think this one goes to show why I think it would be a mistake to expand the playoffs and do away with non-playoff bowl games.
BC
(01-02-2022, 10:47 AM)BostonCard Wrote: Yeah, while the playoff games were snoozefests, the “meaningless” Rose Bowl was a ton of fun to watch, and I’m sure Ohio State and Utah fans didn’t consider it meaningless. Obviously, the problem is that it is hard to know in advance which bowl games are going to be great and which will be lousy, but I think this one goes to show why I think it would be a mistake to expand the playoffs and do away with non-playoff bowl games.
BC
(01-02-2022, 12:28 PM)81alum Wrote: I found it a very entertaining game, but I tuned in too late to hear the explanation of what happened to the Utah secondary. It sounded as if injuries (or COVID?) had depleted it so much that they were starting a running back there? Ohio State's excellent receivers and QB simply made mincemeat out of the Utah secondary--to use a Christmas metaphor. But it also sounded as if Ohio State had lost a bunch of starters. In any case, the teams that were on the field were excellent on offense and poor on defense, and it showed. Makes it fun for people who like a lot of offense.
(01-02-2022, 12:28 PM)81alum Wrote: I found it a very entertaining game, but I tuned in too late to hear the explanation of what happened to the Utah secondary. It sounded as if injuries (or COVID?) had depleted it so much that they were starting a running back there? Ohio State's excellent receivers and QB simply made mincemeat out of the Utah secondary--to use a Christmas metaphor. But it also sounded as if Ohio State had lost a bunch of starters. In any case, the teams that were on the field were excellent on offense and poor on defense, and it showed. Makes it fun for people who like a lot of offense.
(01-02-2022, 01:37 PM)Austroturf Wrote:(01-02-2022, 12:28 PM)81alum Wrote: I found it a very entertaining game, but I tuned in too late to hear the explanation of what happened to the Utah secondary. It sounded as if injuries (or COVID?) had depleted it so much that they were starting a running back there? Ohio State's excellent receivers and QB simply made mincemeat out of the Utah secondary--to use a Christmas metaphor. But it also sounded as if Ohio State had lost a bunch of starters. In any case, the teams that were on the field were excellent on offense and poor on defense, and it showed. Makes it fun for people who like a lot of offense.
True. The Stroud to Smith-Njigba connection was poetry in motion. But with better D-backs, a good portion of those yards would not have happened.
(01-02-2022, 01:37 PM)Austroturf Wrote:(01-02-2022, 12:28 PM)81alum Wrote: I found it a very entertaining game, but I tuned in too late to hear the explanation of what happened to the Utah secondary. It sounded as if injuries (or COVID?) had depleted it so much that they were starting a running back there? Ohio State's excellent receivers and QB simply made mincemeat out of the Utah secondary--to use a Christmas metaphor. But it also sounded as if Ohio State had lost a bunch of starters. In any case, the teams that were on the field were excellent on offense and poor on defense, and it showed. Makes it fun for people who like a lot of offense.
True. The Stroud to Smith-Njigba connection was poetry in motion. But with better D-backs, a good portion of those yards would not have happened.
(01-02-2022, 02:12 PM)Giants Wrote:(01-02-2022, 01:37 PM)Austroturf Wrote:(01-02-2022, 12:28 PM)81alum Wrote: I found it a very entertaining game, but I tuned in too late to hear the explanation of what happened to the Utah secondary. It sounded as if injuries (or COVID?) had depleted it so much that they were starting a running back there? Ohio State's excellent receivers and QB simply made mincemeat out of the Utah secondary--to use a Christmas metaphor. But it also sounded as if Ohio State had lost a bunch of starters. In any case, the teams that were on the field were excellent on offense and poor on defense, and it showed. Makes it fun for people who like a lot of offense.
True. The Stroud to Smith-Njigba connection was poetry in motion. But with better D-backs, a good portion of those yards would not have happened.
…or a better scheme. Utah did a poor job of defending the middle of the secondary. Combine that with a non-existent pass rush and you have a recipe for disaster.
(01-02-2022, 02:12 PM)Giants Wrote:(01-02-2022, 01:37 PM)Austroturf Wrote:(01-02-2022, 12:28 PM)81alum Wrote: I found it a very entertaining game, but I tuned in too late to hear the explanation of what happened to the Utah secondary. It sounded as if injuries (or COVID?) had depleted it so much that they were starting a running back there? Ohio State's excellent receivers and QB simply made mincemeat out of the Utah secondary--to use a Christmas metaphor. But it also sounded as if Ohio State had lost a bunch of starters. In any case, the teams that were on the field were excellent on offense and poor on defense, and it showed. Makes it fun for people who like a lot of offense.
True. The Stroud to Smith-Njigba connection was poetry in motion. But with better D-backs, a good portion of those yards would not have happened.
…or a better scheme. Utah did a poor job of defending the middle of the secondary. Combine that with a non-existent pass rush and you have a recipe for disaster.