(10-07-2022, 10:27 AM)Row80Critic Wrote: Anyone else think it might be worth giving Patu a shot? He just seems to have a bit more 'play maker' in him -- quicker decisions, quicker to see a pocket fall apart, quicker to get away and make something happen. I can see why people are high on McKee's mechanics, etc., but it feels like everything has to go 'just right' for him to look good. Or maybe that's just Shaw coaching him down to run the plays like a robot regardless of circumstances....? Has McKee 'ever' escaped the pocket and made a play?? I'm not bad-mouthing McKee per say -- he'd probably look like a first-rounder on another team with another coach -- but just wondering if this offense might benefit from someone quicker to assess, escape, and improvise....
Absolutely!
I was thinking about what I would like to see from this year's offense before the season began. Having Patu come in with RPO packages was one of the things I was hoping for. If it worked effectively I would be all for Patu replacing McKee as full time starter.
Missing from Stanford's offense since 2015 is a QB with pocket mobility and improvisational ability. Burns, Chryst, and Costello did not have it. Mills had it to only a small degree.
Hogan had it in spades and one can't minimize how critical this dimension was for the team's success. Hogan was a very good runner, both by design and also when the play was not a called QB run. I don't know how many times I saw Hogan go back to pass on 3rd and 8, look...look...and then take off for 10-20 yard run. Game changer. Hogan could also extend plays with his agility and elusiveness, allowing receivers more time to get open.
Conversely, I've watched all the QBs since (Except Chryst on occasion) set up in the pocket, look...look...look, and then try to thread the ball into very tight coverage, often unsuccessfully.
I never would have recruited Burns, Chryst, Costello or McKee. I just don't think any of them were good fits for Stanford, given the personnel that typically surrounds the Stanford QB, particularly receivers that have difficulty getting open "On Time".
The guy that I'm most high on is Ashton Daniels. I've seen him play twice and I'm very impressed with his traits. Stuff that you can't coach. Of course, the staff would have to install the right type of system around him, and not this trendy, ineffective crap that I've been seeing since 2019.
North Dakota State saw a lot of Trey Lance in Daniels. But of course, NDSU also runs the perfect system for a player like him to thrive. But that's another story...