(05-10-2023, 07:17 AM)StanfordMatt Wrote: At some point if you’re Esquer, I think you’ve got to wonder if Eager is the best man to manage the pitching staff. The control issues are too widespread throughout the staff and have been going on too long to ignore imo. Ironically, one of the best to fill the role that I can remember was in the opposing dugout last night.
Some notes on Eager.
Was with Esquer at Cal for two years, now has been at Stanford for 5+.
Year Team ERA (Pac Rk) Walks/game (Rank)
2018 2.88 (1st) 3.11 (3rd)
2019 3.62 (3rd) 3.08 (1st)
2020 3.50 (4th) 4.25 (4th) [aborted season]
2021 4.64 (7th) 4.07 (6th)
2022 4.23 (3rd) 3.98 (5th)
2023 5.65 (9th) 5.02 (11th) [so far]
Not quite sure what to make of that overall.
The walks are largely this year's problem.
The average performance is pretty good but the trend isn't fantastic - while ERAs are rising overall the trend in the ranking isn't great either.
My biggest long term concern about the pitching staff is that there are essentially no contributors right now from the sophomore class. Uber has gone AWOL. The only other nominal pitchers in the class are Montgomery and Sapien who seemed to have mostly left pitching behind and Jaden Bruno is listed on the roster as a RS sophomore. We're going to need this year's frosh pitchers (Scott, Dugan, O'Haran, Moore) to really develop this off-season.