Certainly on a global level, the coaching has been bad to awful, so you might start with priors that any player underpermance is due to poor coaching.
However, it is also very difficult to know what is going on behind the scenes with a specific player or situation, and I think we sometimes get way ahead of ourselves in terms of speculation. Lots of alternative theories, including:
- Day to day variability in games
- Nagging low level injury
- Player herself/skill issue
Take for example former Florida Gator Oliver Rioux. At 7’9” (not a typo) you would think he would simply dominate anywhere he played. Last season, he averaged 0.6 points and 0.5 rebounds per game in 1.5 minutes per game for Florida. Was it the coaching? In his first game after transferring to UCI, he scored 13 points and had 12 rebounds, so you might think so, but then in his second against SJSU, he only had 7 points. He’s a junior, so TBD whether he will reach his potential, but this is certainly not the trajectory that he or Florida expected of him when he was first signed.
On the other hand, we all know what happened when Lauren Betts went from Stanford to UCLA, but even then, the issue was more off the field than on (though still, coaching was a big contributor).
We’ll eventually figure out the story, but I would caution against assuming that just because a player is very tall, she should automatically dominate. I always remember 6’7” Chandra Benton from the late 90’s. You can’t teach height, but unfortunately, height alone is not enough to be a dominant women’s basketball player.
BC