U$C game thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: U$C game thread (/thread-22258.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: U$C game thread (/thread-22258.html)
RE: U$C game thread - 82 Card - 09-11-2021
(09-11-2021, 10:24 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote: Get out the turtle. Ball stays on the ground all 4th quarter. The turtle is our friend.
That turtle is pretty quick!
RE: U$C game thread - BostonCard - 09-11-2021
[tweet]https://twitter.com/popehat/status/1436917948111720448?s=21[/tweet]
That whole thread, lol.
BC
RE: U$C game thread - CardinalSagehen - 09-11-2021
(09-11-2021, 10:37 PM)Madera86 Wrote: This must be one of those fast-striking, aggressive snapping turtles out there.
I’m amazed. We went totally sans turtle, breaking all tendencies.
That sound you hear? It’s the life being sucked out of the Trojans’ souls.
This is “what’s your deal” territory now.
mtaguchi@yahoo.com - Griffins78 - 09-11-2021
I don’t think our OLine has had a single penalty.
RE: U$C game thread - winflop - 09-11-2021
I'll be having a big slice of humble pie after a heaping helping of crow
And I'll be smiling from ear to ear through the whole thing
Few things in Stanford football give me more joy than putting a beat down on the Toejams in their house
HEY HELTON WHATS YOUR DEAL?!?!?!?
RE: U$C game thread - needle - 09-11-2021
Wow. Just wow.
Very glad to see lots of throws on that last TD drive...and now there's no need for Stanford to throw any more passes the rest of the game.
The defense has outplayed SC in the second half, while the offense is continuing to do its thing. A great, great win.
RE: U$C game thread - Ronnietrader - 09-11-2021
"Let's hang 50 on those mother f-----", J. Harbaugh, 2009
RE: U$C game thread - CardinalSagehen - 09-11-2021
Kansas State must be really frickin’ good.
RE: mtaguchi@yahoo.com - winflop - 09-11-2021
Griffins78 Wrote:I don’t think our OLine has had a single penalty.Holding on Rouse on that last drive
RE: U$C game thread - French Rage - 09-11-2021
(09-11-2021, 10:42 PM)CardinalSagehen Wrote: Kansas State must be really frickin’ good.
Souther Illinois sure hopes so.
RE: U$C game thread - TrumpCard - 09-11-2021
If Stanford does score another TD, will Shaw go for 2 to hit fiddy.
RE: U$C game thread - MV72018 - 09-11-2021
Well, as much as I hated what I saw last week, I am bloody impressed with what I've seen this week. I must give kudos to David Shaw for changing his playcalling, for choosing the obviously superior QB, and for going for it on 4th down. Good work, Shaw. Keep it up.
RE: mtaguchi@yahoo.com - martyup - 09-11-2021
(09-11-2021, 10:41 PM)Griffins78 Wrote: I don’t think our OLine has had a single penalty.
Rouse had a holding call.
RE: U$C game thread - BostonCard - 09-11-2021
“Some people were saying that David Shaw’s star might be losing its shine after that K State game.”
The announcers reading this board?
BC
Boo.
BC
RE: U$C game thread - martyup - 09-11-2021
Kelly finally got beat. That was a nice catch and not bad defense.
RE: U$C game thread - BostonCard - 09-11-2021
(09-11-2021, 10:43 PM)TrumpCard Wrote: If Stanford does score another TD, will Shaw go for 2 to hit fiddy.
Pretty sure he won’t.
Then again, today Shaw went for it on fourth and goal from the four, and has kept throwing with a four touchdown lead. So, maybe?
BC
(09-11-2021, 10:48 PM)martyup Wrote: Kelly finally got beat. That was a nice catch and not bad defense.
And also a bit of offensive pass interference (though probably not much more than we’ve gotten away with for years). Still there was a bit more contact than merely shielding the DB from the ball. Kelly’s head was pushed back.
BC
RE: mtaguchi@yahoo.com - murky - 09-11-2021
(09-11-2021, 10:41 PM)Griffins78 Wrote: I don’t think our OLine has had a single penalty.
Rouse got a hold call, still much cleaner.
RE: U$C game thread - BostonCard - 09-11-2021
Why didn’t SC go for two?
BC
RE: U$C game thread - PVTree - 09-11-2021
(09-11-2021, 10:51 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Why didn’t SC go for two?
BC
20 looks better than 19.
If they score 3 more TDs, the condoms will go for 2. No need to do so now.
RE: U$C game thread - martyup - 09-11-2021
How good is our D? Wasn't SC's offense supposed to be stellar?
Right now each team has about the same total yards on offense. We have 50 more yards through the air. McKee has 234 yards and 3 TDs. He should have a high QBR for this game.