FB -- Clemson Game Thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: FB -- Clemson Game Thread (/thread-25150.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: FB -- Clemson Game Thread (/thread-25150.html)
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - ADPinWDC - 09-28-2024
We move the ball... and then Daniels throws ANOTHER stupid floating INT
... Stanford now 3 TURNOVERS in Q1 -- in Death Valley.
And yet, we piled up more yardage, 143 vs 127 in Q1
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - lex24 - 09-28-2024
(09-28-2024, 04:47 PM)PVTree Wrote: WTF was that!? Awful decision.
That’s two. Both in scoring zone. Can Lamson be worse?
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - SkiBum80 - 09-28-2024
We’re on track for 12 turnovers this game.
Maybe a bakers dozen
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - chrisk - 09-28-2024
On track for a turnover record?
Minimal special teams action for both teams. One 20-yard FG. Now a punt.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - MV72018 - 09-28-2024
(09-28-2024, 04:49 PM)SkiBum80 Wrote: We’re on track for 12 turnovers this game
Daniels is not a Power 5 QB. When is Brown returning from injury. The job is his.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - d4cohn - 09-28-2024
(09-28-2024, 04:48 PM)lex24 Wrote:(09-28-2024, 04:47 PM)PVTree Wrote: WTF was that!? Awful decision.
That’s two. Both in scoring zone. Can Lamson be worse?
He is (at least for the standard of being a full time starter and having to throw the ball significantly, and not just run QB option). He already has a turnover of his own on 4th and 1.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - chrisk - 09-28-2024
Stanford leads TOP by more than a 2-1 margin.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - SkiBum80 - 09-28-2024
Daniels coulda gotten a mani pedi in the time in pocket his OLine gave him before he took the sack
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - gailtate - 09-28-2024
What's that garment-skirt thing that Daniels is wearing? And why? Not that it will make any difference tonight, but still. Looks as lame as the helmets.
Ol' Dab should cover the spread pretty comfortably.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - SkiBum80 - 09-28-2024
He tries throw it away when shouldn’t
And doesn’t (taking a sack) when he should
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - chrisk - 09-28-2024
Stanford leads Clemson in 1st downs 7-3.
Stanford leads in yardage 143-127.
At that pace, Stanford would have 572 yards for the game.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - MV72018 - 09-28-2024
(09-28-2024, 04:48 PM)d4cohn Wrote: [quote="lex24" pid='418876' dateline='1727566718']
Stanford has improved significantly on both sides of the ball in the running game. Not so much in the passing game.
I’m sorry, but he sits if I’m coaching. A high school QB shouldn’t do that.
Another problem is that our receivers, even Ayom, do not get much separation, so it’s risky passing to them. I think that’s what accounts for the last sack.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - SkiBum80 - 09-28-2024
(09-28-2024, 04:55 PM)gailtate Wrote: What's that garment-skirt thing that Daniels is wearing? And why? Not that it will make any difference tonight, but still. Looks as lame as the helmets.It’s Daniels flag, he showed up for flag football
Ol' Dab should cover the spread pretty comfortably.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - martyup - 09-28-2024
I like our defense. And our offensive line is opening holes.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - SkiBum80 - 09-28-2024
MV72018 dateline='[url=tel:1727567773' Wrote: 1727567773[/url]']This has been a surprising frequent problem
d4cohn dateline='[url=tel:1727567317' Wrote: 1727567317[/url]']
[quote="lex24" pid='418876' dateline='1727566718']
Stanford has improved significantly on both sides of the ball in the running game. Not so much in the passing game.
I’m sorry, but he sits if I’m coaching. A high school QB shouldn’t do that.
Another problem is that our receivers, even Ayom, do not get much separation, so it’s risky passing to them. I think that’s what accounts for the last sack.
Coach TT even referred to it as something needing big improvement
It’s so surprising causing Ayomanor got open so much last year
(09-28-2024, 05:15 PM)martyup Wrote: I like our defense. And our offensive line is opening holes.I like our D doesn’t seem to let the O’s mistakes get them down
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - martyup - 09-28-2024
We can run on these guys. I think we should keep feeding Ford.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - ADPinWDC - 09-28-2024
The OTHER Marquee Matchup -- BAMA vs GEOG -- is boring.
BAMA is having their way with the Dawgs. Up 21 - zip, near end of Q1.
GEOG has just 21 yards of offense. Nuttin in Tuscaloosa.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - Mick - 09-28-2024
(09-28-2024, 04:50 PM)MV72018 Wrote:(09-28-2024, 04:49 PM)SkiBum80 Wrote: We’re on track for 12 turnovers this game
Daniels is not a Power 5 QB. When is Brown returning from injury. The job is his.
He's a terrific running quarterback, with excellent running instincts. And he has no other positives as a QB. Literally none.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - martyup - 09-28-2024
We give it to Ford and gain 40+ yards (incl. the facemask penalty). Feed Ford.
RE: FB -- Clemson Game Thread - ADPinWDC - 09-28-2024
Near end of first half, down 17-0 despite more rushing yards at >7 yards per tote.
THREE costly, stupid turnovers. We would be in the game otherwise.
We can move the ball, and our rush defense remains fairly stout.
And, now moving again. Ford looks very tough running the ball.