The CardBoard
2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel (/thread-22759.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - BostonCard - 08-21-2022

You might want to switch Austin Uke from OL to DL.

BC

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Phogge - 08-21-2022

Or to guitar.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - CompSci87 - 08-21-2022

(08-21-2022, 08:54 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Or to guitar.

Lol!

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - BostonCard - 08-22-2022

(08-21-2022, 08:54 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Or to guitar.

Or to Dallas?

BC

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 08-22-2022

(08-21-2022, 08:28 PM)BostonCard Wrote:  You might want to switch Austin Uke from OL to DL.

BC

He's listed on the official roster as OG (I actually cross-checked the roster last night). Can you document the switch? Happy to make it.

-m.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - BostonCard - 08-22-2022

See this thread: https://thecardboard.org/board/showthread.php?tid=23363&page=4&highlight=Uke

If Sam is wrong, it would be the first time that I know of.

BC

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - msqueri - 08-22-2022

He's certainly not wrong. Photographic and video evidence make abundantly clear Uke is playing DL in camp and coaches have explicitly discussed his DL transition. Even if Uke switches back to OL SamuelMcF is not wrong. It's possible the transition is somewhat experimental and the official site is waiting for confirmation, or that we're being sneaky and looking to unveil Uke as a secret weapon on DL, but much more likely in my view is that the roster is wrong. Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by incompetence.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Phogge - 08-22-2022

With malice toward none, with charity for all.....

Stanford's DL was certainly charitable last year.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - newguy - 08-22-2022

(08-22-2022, 08:00 PM)Phogge Wrote:  With malice toward none, with charity for all.....

Stanford's DL was certainly charitable last year.
........and no one ever thanked us for it.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 08-29-2022

Chart updated to reflect depth chart for Colgate game.

I also switched sophomore Austin Uke from OG to DL, as reflected on the official roster.

I've always thought it was sort of weird that they list three receivers and a fullback as starters, though I understand they may start out in one or the other formation. At any rate, I reluctantly listed three receivers and a fullback as starters, even though that makes twelve starters on offense.

Likewise, they are now listing the nickelback as a starter, making twelve starters on defense as well, though I realize that we play out of the nickel package quite a bit, which is good considering the quality of our front seven. Anyway, I listed all twelve there as well.

I also added other positional responsibilities listed on depth chart (kick returner, punt returner, holder). Interestingly, they no longer list who handles kickoffs.

-m.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - SamuelMcF - 08-29-2022

Frosh Williams and Wright both S --> CB
Jaden Slocum CB --> S

Weird that they no longer list who handles kickoffs, but that's obviously Karty.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 08-29-2022

(08-29-2022, 06:36 PM)SamuelMcF Wrote:  Frosh Williams and Wright both S --> CB
Jaden Slocum CB --> S

Weird that they no longer list who handles kickoffs, but that's obviously Karty.

Thanks for this, SMF. Was going to do a cross-check with the roster tonight, but you saved me the trouble!

-m.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Maple Leaf - 08-30-2022

Coco Lukrich is not listed on the current team roster.  I assume it is a medical retirement.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - SamuelMcF - 08-30-2022

(08-30-2022, 05:37 AM)Maple Leaf Wrote:  Coco Lukrich is not listed on the current team roster.  I assume it is a medical retirement.

I doubt it. Dude was practicing and taking team photos as recently as last week.

However, considering he was one of two scholarship fullbacks in the same class (WTF?!?!?!), this is actually a good thing from a roster management perspective. That scholarship should have gone elsewhere to begin with.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - msqueri - 08-30-2022

Could be medical retirement. (Never know when enough is enough) Could be transfer elsewhere recognizing fullback is becoming less and less a part of our identity and he's buried. Could be a combo of things where he's essentially pushed out the door to get us to the scholarship limit (kind of unclear exactly where we stand on that given Jorgensen/Keck/Fields/walk-ons who may get scholarships. Could be something else.

Agree that it's very welcome news from a roster management standpoint. We absolutely do not need both Taylor and Lukrich going forward. This makes the roster management for the 2023 roster one spot more manageable.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 09-01-2022

Updating chart...

I have removed sophomore FB Coco Lukrich. I was thinking that maybe he is doing an LDS mission (he is from Utah, but not sure if he's LDS), but others have reported that he was with the team very recently. Mystery. Interesting tidbit: out of HS, he was listed as a DE by PrepStar, and as an OG by 247. Versatile guy! Could have used him at either of those other two positions.

I have also removed sophomore walk-on ILB William Stockwell, who also appears to have retired from football.

Best of luck to both!

-m.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Red80 - 09-01-2022

(09-01-2022, 11:09 AM)Langdude Wrote:  Updating chart...

I have removed sophomore FB Coco Lukrich. I was thinking that maybe he is doing an LDS mission (he is from Utah, but not sure if he's LDS), but others have reported that he was with the team very recently. Mystery. Interesting tidbit: out of HS, he was listed as a DE by PrepStar, and as an OG by 247. Versatile guy! Could have used him at either of those other two positions.

I have also removed sophomore walk-on ILB William Stockwell, who also appears to have retired from football.

Best of luck to both!
Disappointing news about Coco. I had high hopes for him as a FB in reestablishing Stanford's once physical run game. A big, athletic guy whom I had visions of delivering devastating kick-out blocks from unbalanced sets. 






-m.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - msqueri - 09-01-2022

The extra scholarship more important to us than the outside possibility Lukrich would have leap-frogged Shield Taylor on the depth chart in order to win 8-12 snaps a game. Lukrich was projecting as a zero to 12 snap a game player for us over the course of his entire career. Now we get an extra scholarship for the next four years. That is helpful to try to instill a competitive walk-on culture by leaving open the possibility for the best walk-on to be converted, as well as to help navigate the off-season scholarship crunch (an extra fifth year player returning, for instance). It's impossible to know now where that edge case will be four months from now but it is highly likely to be more significant than a 0-12 snap player (who given Taylor was much more likely to be on the low end of that spectrum).

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Red80 - 09-01-2022

(09-01-2022, 12:50 PM)msqueri Wrote:  The extra scholarship more important to us than the outside possibility Lukrich would have leap-frogged Shield Taylor on the depth chart in order to win 8-12 snaps a game. Lukrich was projecting as a zero to 12 snap a game player for us over the course of his entire career. Now we get an extra scholarship for the next four years. That is helpful to try to instill a competitive walk-on culture by leaving open the possibility for the best walk-on to be converted, as well as to help navigate the off-season scholarship crunch (an extra fifth year player returning, for instance). It's impossible to know now where that edge case will be four months from now but it is highly likely to be more significant than a 0-12 snap player (who given Taylor was much more likely to be on the low end of that spectrum).

How do you know Lukrich was projecting as a zero to 12 snap p/g player over the course of his career? Based on the usage of the FB over the past few seasons? If so, yes, but that has to change. Way too much 10 and 11 personnel for me. Stanford has become less because of it.
I desperately want to see the Fullback position return as a major force for Stanford football. Shaw once said, "We lead the nation in fullbacks." 

Of course, that was during a stretch of very successful football.

RE: 2022 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 09-04-2022

Raiders

Walk-On Union Watch. A full dozen non-scholarship players got PT against the Toothpaste, with an incredible six collegiate debuts. No statistics were recorded in the game unless noted. In addition...
Frosh Force. Seven true freshmen played against the Tartar Control. None recorded any statistics unless noted.
Bench Bunch. The following non-injured non-frosh scholarship players did not appear against Colgate. Sophomore RB Brendon Barrow, sophomore DL Zach Buckey, and sophomore ILB Ese Dubre all made their collegiate debuts. Congratulations!

M*A*S*H Unit. The following players did not appear against the Raiders due to injury. I am basing this on both official reports and reporting done by Cardboarders. Please do correct me if I am wrong.