09-08-2018, 11:48 PM
[tweet]https://twitter.com/zach_barnett/status/1038645046273298433[/tweet]
Quite the stat...
BC
Quite the stat...
BC
(09-09-2018, 01:52 AM)CompSci87 Wrote: I wonder what makes the 10 mentioned in the tweet "bold" hires but Edwards not. Somehow I suspect the basis for the list wasn't boldness (whether meant literally or sarcastically), but simply whether the newly hired coach hasn't won against FBS competition yet.
(09-09-2018, 01:52 AM)CompSci87 Wrote: I wonder what makes the 10 mentioned in the tweet "bold" hires but Edwards not. Somehow I suspect the basis for the list wasn't boldness (whether meant literally or sarcastically), but simply whether the newly hired coach hasn't won against FBS competition yet.
(09-09-2018, 10:48 AM)oldalum Wrote: Most new coaching hires are for teams that are doing poorly. I would expect them to be <.500 against good competition in their first couple of games. Usually one allows more time for a turnaround of a floundering program, no?
(09-09-2018, 10:48 AM)oldalum Wrote: Most new coaching hires are for teams that are doing poorly. I would expect them to be <.500 against good competition in their first couple of games. Usually one allows more time for a turnaround of a floundering program, no?