[jonnyss]

On our present team, Dawn also has freshmen Ashlyn Watkins (Columbia) and Taylasia Cooper (bennetsville) who were Top 25 recruits last year. Next year's class has #2 Joyce Edwards (Camden, basically a Columbia suburb). A lot of talent from a State with a population of less than 5 mill. But then, she and A'Ja had a lot to do with building interest in high school girls basketball in the state. The Ole Miss and Florida coaching staffs have strong connections to SC and had been recruiting Malaysia since the 7th grade.

joyce edwards has committed to south carolina? or do you just mean that joyce is from in state and therefore south carolina has an advantage?

[jonnyss]

On our present team, Dawn also has freshmen Ashlyn Watkins (Columbia) and Taylasia Cooper (bennetsville) who were Top 25 recruits last year. Next year's class has #2 Joyce Edwards (Camden, basically a Columbia suburb). A lot of talent from a State with a population of less than 5 mill. But then, she and A'Ja had a lot to do with building interest in high school girls basketball in the state. The Ole Miss and Florida coaching staffs have strong connections to SC and had been recruiting Malaysia since the 7th grade.

joyce edwards has committed to south carolina? or do you just mean that joyce is from in state and therefore south carolina has an advantage?

[Hulk01]

---

---

Hidalgo's Instagram features a photo of her wearing a Stanford uniform and holding a large block S,

[Hulk01]

---

---

Hidalgo's Instagram features a photo of her wearing a Stanford uniform and holding a large block S,

[Card10Fan]

---

---

Hidalgo's  Instagram features a photo of her wearing a Stanford uniform and holding a large block S,

She also has posts about her OV to Notre Dame and her other social media accounts have stuff from her Duke visit as well. She’s documented all three.

[Card10Fan]

---

---

Hidalgo's  Instagram features a photo of her wearing a Stanford uniform and holding a large block S,

She also has posts about her OV to Notre Dame and her other social media accounts have stuff from her Duke visit as well. She’s documented all three.

[Jskass]

Tea leaves can make you crazy.

[Jskass]

Tea leaves can make you crazy.

[Card10Fan]

Tea leaves can make you crazy.

Yes. Best to not get hopes up too much nor fixate on what's out of one's control. Hoping for the best. Time will tell.

[Card10Fan]

Tea leaves can make you crazy.

Yes. Best to not get hopes up too much nor fixate on what's out of one's control. Hoping for the best. Time will tell.

[VisitingCock]

On our present team, Dawn also has freshmen Ashlyn Watkins (Columbia) and Taylasia Cooper (bennetsville) who were Top 25 recruits last year. Next year's class has #2 Joyce Edwards (Camden, basically a Columbia suburb). A lot of talent from a State with a population of less than 5 mill. But then, she and A'Ja had a lot to do with building interest in high school girls basketball in the state. The Ole Miss and Florida coaching staffs have strong connections to SC and had been recruiting Malaysia since the 7th grade.

joyce edwards has committed to south carolina? or do you just mean that joyce is from in state and therefore south carolina has an advantage?

Actually neither is completely accurate. I was merely stating that Joyce is part of the alluded to "luck" Dawn has in having local talent. Did not mean to imply that we have an advantage. Joyce REALLY cares about her academics. Stanford scares me in that regard. Visited us recently wearing a Yale t-shirt.

[VisitingCock]

On our present team, Dawn also has freshmen Ashlyn Watkins (Columbia) and Taylasia Cooper (bennetsville) who were Top 25 recruits last year. Next year's class has #2 Joyce Edwards (Camden, basically a Columbia suburb). A lot of talent from a State with a population of less than 5 mill. But then, she and A'Ja had a lot to do with building interest in high school girls basketball in the state. The Ole Miss and Florida coaching staffs have strong connections to SC and had been recruiting Malaysia since the 7th grade.

joyce edwards has committed to south carolina? or do you just mean that joyce is from in state and therefore south carolina has an advantage?

Actually neither is completely accurate. I was merely stating that Joyce is part of the alluded to "luck" Dawn has in having local talent. Did not mean to imply that we have an advantage. Joyce REALLY cares about her academics. Stanford scares me in that regard. Visited us recently wearing a Yale t-shirt.

[BostonCard]

Just curious, are the team rankings your own subjective impression, based on a service, or based on some formula?

BC

Quite simplistic, combination of ESPN grade (example: 98) and ESPN overall ranking for each recruit, 
a throwback from Hoopgurlz  when I was asked by Hoopgurlz to rank recruiting classes from 2006-2010.  
I consider the ESPN grade to be the primary criterion, and the ESPN overall ranking kind of
provides a sub-ranking within the ESPN grade. 

For example: 
#1 WATKINS is 98(1) and #2 WILLIAMS is 98(2);   
#3 DONOVAN is 97(1), #4 TOOMEY is 97(2), #5 HIDALGO is 97(3), etc.
#12 BOOKER is 96(1), #13 FULWILEY is 96(2), etc
#25 Tessa JOHNSON is 95(1), #26 BELL is 95(2), etc.

There are some subjective elements that enter the equation, 
like what I did when I proposed a tie for #3 
among Duke, South Carolina and UConn
in the latest edition after #13 FULWILEY and
#27 OKUNANWA announced their commitments.

I really appreciate the ESPN ranking system, because the ESPN grade
differentiates the talent levels of players.  This way, 
we are made aware that #1 WATKINS and #2 Mikayla WILLIAMS
(both with ESPN grade = 98) are a cut above the next level of talents 
who have an ESPN grade = 97 which include #3 DONOVAN, 
#4 TOOMEY, #5 HIDALGO...#10 OGDEN and #11 SCOTT, and so on.

There may be some false precision in that, especially once you get past the top few recruits, but you go with the data you have, and I appreciate your efforts.

What I was trying to ask is how you arrive at your team rankings, and especially how you balance the quality versus quantity question. For example, let’s say that school A has two recruits, ranked 10 and 20, while school B has three recruits, ranked 15, 25, and 35.  Is adding the third recruit enough to overcome a 5 spot gap between the top two recruits in each school?

I’m not quibbling with your rankings, which pass the eyeball test, but I was wondering if you had a quantitative methodology or if you were using the “eyeball” method.

BC

[BostonCard]

Just curious, are the team rankings your own subjective impression, based on a service, or based on some formula?

BC

Quite simplistic, combination of ESPN grade (example: 98) and ESPN overall ranking for each recruit, 
a throwback from Hoopgurlz  when I was asked by Hoopgurlz to rank recruiting classes from 2006-2010.  
I consider the ESPN grade to be the primary criterion, and the ESPN overall ranking kind of
provides a sub-ranking within the ESPN grade. 

For example: 
#1 WATKINS is 98(1) and #2 WILLIAMS is 98(2);   
#3 DONOVAN is 97(1), #4 TOOMEY is 97(2), #5 HIDALGO is 97(3), etc.
#12 BOOKER is 96(1), #13 FULWILEY is 96(2), etc
#25 Tessa JOHNSON is 95(1), #26 BELL is 95(2), etc.

There are some subjective elements that enter the equation, 
like what I did when I proposed a tie for #3 
among Duke, South Carolina and UConn
in the latest edition after #13 FULWILEY and
#27 OKUNANWA announced their commitments.

I really appreciate the ESPN ranking system, because the ESPN grade
differentiates the talent levels of players.  This way, 
we are made aware that #1 WATKINS and #2 Mikayla WILLIAMS
(both with ESPN grade = 98) are a cut above the next level of talents 
who have an ESPN grade = 97 which include #3 DONOVAN, 
#4 TOOMEY, #5 HIDALGO...#10 OGDEN and #11 SCOTT, and so on.

There may be some false precision in that, especially once you get past the top few recruits, but you go with the data you have, and I appreciate your efforts.

What I was trying to ask is how you arrive at your team rankings, and especially how you balance the quality versus quantity question. For example, let’s say that school A has two recruits, ranked 10 and 20, while school B has three recruits, ranked 15, 25, and 35.  Is adding the third recruit enough to overcome a 5 spot gap between the top two recruits in each school?

I’m not quibbling with your rankings, which pass the eyeball test, but I was wondering if you had a quantitative methodology or if you were using the “eyeball” method.

BC

[Hoops9092]

It's been confirmed that JuJu will announce her college decision on Tuesday according to a writer with the LA Times and that details of the announcement will be provided by Monday. 

https://twitter.com/latsondheimer/status..._&ref_url=

[Hoops9092]

It's been confirmed that JuJu will announce her college decision on Tuesday according to a writer with the LA Times and that details of the announcement will be provided by Monday. 

https://twitter.com/latsondheimer/status..._&ref_url=

[Hoops9092]

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

[Hoops9092]

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

[Hulk01]

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

These recruiting misses by UCLA make Kiki Rice's decision ( to opt for the Bruins last year, perhaps to lead their resurgence) look more questionable.

[Hulk01]

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

These recruiting misses by UCLA make Kiki Rice's decision ( to opt for the Bruins last year, perhaps to lead their resurgence) look more questionable.

[Hoops9092]

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

These recruiting misses by UCLA make Kiki Rice's decision ( to opt for the Bruins last year, perhaps to lead their resurgence) look more questionable.

100%. Even more the selling point to join an established program (Psss, Juju). It's so rare to turn things around in the short 4 year window these players have. And it's crucial to sign top recruits in consecutive years, something UCLA wasn't able to do.

[Hoops9092]

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

These recruiting misses by UCLA make Kiki Rice's decision ( to opt for the Bruins last year, perhaps to lead their resurgence) look more questionable.

100%. Even more the selling point to join an established program (Psss, Juju). It's so rare to turn things around in the short 4 year window these players have. And it's crucial to sign top recruits in consecutive years, something UCLA wasn't able to do.

[WBB fan]

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

These recruiting misses by UCLA make Kiki Rice's decision ( to opt for the Bruins last year, perhaps to lead their resurgence) look more questionable.

100%. Even more the selling point to join an established program (Psss, Juju). It's so rare to turn things around in the short 4 year window these players have. And it's crucial to sign top recruits in consecutive years, something UCLA wasn't able to do.

I'm wondering if the pac 12 departure is a factor ft

[WBB fan]

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

These recruiting misses by UCLA make Kiki Rice's decision ( to opt for the Bruins last year, perhaps to lead their resurgence) look more questionable.

100%. Even more the selling point to join an established program (Psss, Juju). It's so rare to turn things around in the short 4 year window these players have. And it's crucial to sign top recruits in consecutive years, something UCLA wasn't able to do.

I'm wondering if the pac 12 departure is a factor ft

[joemontes]

Just curious, are the team rankings your own subjective impression, based on a service, or based on some formula?

BC

Quite simplistic, combination of ESPN grade (example: 98) and ESPN overall ranking for each recruit, 
a throwback from Hoopgurlz  when I was asked by Hoopgurlz to rank recruiting classes from 2006-2010.  
I consider the ESPN grade to be the primary criterion, and the ESPN overall ranking kind of
provides a sub-ranking within the ESPN grade. 

For example: 
#1 WATKINS is 98(1) and #2 WILLIAMS is 98(2);   
#3 DONOVAN is 97(1), #4 TOOMEY is 97(2), #5 HIDALGO is 97(3), etc.
#12 BOOKER is 96(1), #13 FULWILEY is 96(2), etc
#25 Tessa JOHNSON is 95(1), #26 BELL is 95(2), etc.

There are some subjective elements that enter the equation, 
like what I did when I proposed a tie for #3 
among Duke, South Carolina and UConn
in the latest edition after #13 FULWILEY and
#27 OKUNANWA announced their commitments.

I really appreciate the ESPN ranking system, because the ESPN grade
differentiates the talent levels of players.  This way, 
we are made aware that #1 WATKINS and #2 Mikayla WILLIAMS
(both with ESPN grade = 98) are a cut above the next level of talents 
who have an ESPN grade = 97 which include #3 DONOVAN, 
#4 TOOMEY, #5 HIDALGO...#10 OGDEN and #11 SCOTT, and so on.

There may be some false precision in that, especially once you get past the top few recruits, but you go with the data you have, and I appreciate your efforts.

What I was trying to ask is how you arrive at your team rankings, and especially how you balance the quality versus quantity question. For example, let’s say that school A has two recruits, ranked 10 and 20, while school B has three recruits, ranked 15, 25, and 35.  Is adding the third recruit enough to overcome a 5 spot gap between the top two recruits in each school?

I’m not quibbling with your rankings, which pass the eyeball test, but I was wondering if you had a quantitative methodology or if you were using the “eyeball” method.

BC

At this point, and having done this extensively back 
in 2006-2010 for Hoopgurlz,  it's really more of an "eyeball" 
method, but with some mental statistical calculations involved.

And I definitely hear you wrt quantity vs quality question.
This is pretty evident when I bunched together Duke, 
South Carolina and UConn (mentioned alphabetically)
as a three-way tie for #3.  I could have easily opted
for South Carolina to have sole possession of #3 
with 4 commits 96(#2), 96 (#6), 95(#1) and 94(#3),
compared to 3 commits for both 
Duke 97(#1), 95(#3) and 95(#5) and 
UConn 97(#4), 96(#4) and 94(#4).

But, for me, the quality of Duke's Top 3 (#3 overall) OR 
UConn's Top 6 (#6 overall) high 97 grade commit
is comparable to the quality of South Carolina's 
96(#2) and 96(#6) combined 1st and 2nd recruits.
Because, historically speaking, a Top 5+ recruit
has the same or even double the impact 
of two Top 15+ recruits.

---

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

These recruiting misses by UCLA make Kiki Rice's decision ( to opt for the Bruins last year, perhaps to lead their resurgence) look more questionable.

100%. Even more the selling point to join an established program (Psss, Juju). It's so rare to turn things around in the short 4 year window these players have. And it's crucial to sign top recruits in consecutive years, something UCLA wasn't able to do.

In more recent years, UCLA has relied heavily on recruiting top foreign players, 
especially post players.  Currently, they have:

- RS So 6'4 Emily BESSOIR (leading member of several French youth national teams)

- So 6'4 Izzy ANSTLEY (leading member of Australia's U19 national team,
of which Stanford's Agnes EMMA-NNOPU was also a member,
that almost upset the USA in the gold medal game in 2019)

- Fr 6'3 Lina SONTAG (leading member of several German youth national teams
and a reserve for the German senior national team) 

They have a 4th player, RS So 6'4 Angela DUGALIC, a former McDAA
from Illinois and was a member of the Serbian senior national team 
during the 2021 Tokyo Olympics.

Unfortunately, they can't seem to play together at the same time, 
as most of them were/are injured.  BESSOIR missed the entire 
last season, while DUGALIC will miss the entire current season
and ANSTLEY is currently recuperating from an injury but will
hopefully be back in late Dec in time for the start of PAC 12 play.

[joemontes]

Just curious, are the team rankings your own subjective impression, based on a service, or based on some formula?

BC

Quite simplistic, combination of ESPN grade (example: 98) and ESPN overall ranking for each recruit, 
a throwback from Hoopgurlz  when I was asked by Hoopgurlz to rank recruiting classes from 2006-2010.  
I consider the ESPN grade to be the primary criterion, and the ESPN overall ranking kind of
provides a sub-ranking within the ESPN grade. 

For example: 
#1 WATKINS is 98(1) and #2 WILLIAMS is 98(2);   
#3 DONOVAN is 97(1), #4 TOOMEY is 97(2), #5 HIDALGO is 97(3), etc.
#12 BOOKER is 96(1), #13 FULWILEY is 96(2), etc
#25 Tessa JOHNSON is 95(1), #26 BELL is 95(2), etc.

There are some subjective elements that enter the equation, 
like what I did when I proposed a tie for #3 
among Duke, South Carolina and UConn
in the latest edition after #13 FULWILEY and
#27 OKUNANWA announced their commitments.

I really appreciate the ESPN ranking system, because the ESPN grade
differentiates the talent levels of players.  This way, 
we are made aware that #1 WATKINS and #2 Mikayla WILLIAMS
(both with ESPN grade = 98) are a cut above the next level of talents 
who have an ESPN grade = 97 which include #3 DONOVAN, 
#4 TOOMEY, #5 HIDALGO...#10 OGDEN and #11 SCOTT, and so on.

There may be some false precision in that, especially once you get past the top few recruits, but you go with the data you have, and I appreciate your efforts.

What I was trying to ask is how you arrive at your team rankings, and especially how you balance the quality versus quantity question. For example, let’s say that school A has two recruits, ranked 10 and 20, while school B has three recruits, ranked 15, 25, and 35.  Is adding the third recruit enough to overcome a 5 spot gap between the top two recruits in each school?

I’m not quibbling with your rankings, which pass the eyeball test, but I was wondering if you had a quantitative methodology or if you were using the “eyeball” method.

BC

At this point, and having done this extensively back 
in 2006-2010 for Hoopgurlz,  it's really more of an "eyeball" 
method, but with some mental statistical calculations involved.

And I definitely hear you wrt quantity vs quality question.
This is pretty evident when I bunched together Duke, 
South Carolina and UConn (mentioned alphabetically)
as a three-way tie for #3.  I could have easily opted
for South Carolina to have sole possession of #3 
with 4 commits 96(#2), 96 (#6), 95(#1) and 94(#3),
compared to 3 commits for both 
Duke 97(#1), 95(#3) and 95(#5) and 
UConn 97(#4), 96(#4) and 94(#4).

But, for me, the quality of Duke's Top 3 (#3 overall) OR 
UConn's Top 6 (#6 overall) high 97 grade commit
is comparable to the quality of South Carolina's 
96(#2) and 96(#6) combined 1st and 2nd recruits.
Because, historically speaking, a Top 5+ recruit
has the same or even double the impact 
of two Top 15+ recruits.

---

#19 Laila Reynolds, a 6'0 guard out of Maryland has committed to Florida this afternoon. UCLA was one of her finalists.

Another miss for the Bruins in an attempt to snag some top talent following their highly regarded 2022 class. Looks like UCLA will just sign 1 recruit in the class, #32 Amanda Muse a 6'4 post.

These recruiting misses by UCLA make Kiki Rice's decision ( to opt for the Bruins last year, perhaps to lead their resurgence) look more questionable.

100%. Even more the selling point to join an established program (Psss, Juju). It's so rare to turn things around in the short 4 year window these players have. And it's crucial to sign top recruits in consecutive years, something UCLA wasn't able to do.

In more recent years, UCLA has relied heavily on recruiting top foreign players, 
especially post players.  Currently, they have:

- RS So 6'4 Emily BESSOIR (leading member of several French youth national teams)

- So 6'4 Izzy ANSTLEY (leading member of Australia's U19 national team,
of which Stanford's Agnes EMMA-NNOPU was also a member,
that almost upset the USA in the gold medal game in 2019)

- Fr 6'3 Lina SONTAG (leading member of several German youth national teams
and a reserve for the German senior national team) 

They have a 4th player, RS So 6'4 Angela DUGALIC, a former McDAA
from Illinois and was a member of the Serbian senior national team 
during the 2021 Tokyo Olympics.

Unfortunately, they can't seem to play together at the same time, 
as most of them were/are injured.  BESSOIR missed the entire 
last season, while DUGALIC will miss the entire current season
and ANSTLEY is currently recuperating from an injury but will
hopefully be back in late Dec in time for the start of PAC 12 play.

[BostonCard]

Thanks Joe, that makes a lot of sense, and I appreciate the discussion.  Your point about top-5 talent is well-taken.  For example, would a class that had the #10 and #11 recruits really be the same as a class with the #1 and #20 recruits?  Usually the difference between the #11 and #20 is pretty small, while the difference between the #1 and #10 is much larger.

BC

[BostonCard]

Thanks Joe, that makes a lot of sense, and I appreciate the discussion.  Your point about top-5 talent is well-taken.  For example, would a class that had the #10 and #11 recruits really be the same as a class with the #1 and #20 recruits?  Usually the difference between the #11 and #20 is pretty small, while the difference between the #1 and #10 is much larger.

BC

[Hoops9092]

#16 Prosper to Notre Dame, spreading the wealth a bit. She chose the Irish over Arizona, Duke, UNC and South Carolina. 

Now just Watkins and Hidalgo, the last 2 uncommitted prospects in the top 40.

[Hoops9092]

#16 Prosper to Notre Dame, spreading the wealth a bit. She chose the Irish over Arizona, Duke, UNC and South Carolina. 

Now just Watkins and Hidalgo, the last 2 uncommitted prospects in the top 40.

[joemontes]

#16 Prosper to Notre Dame, spreading the wealth a bit. She chose the Irish over Arizona, Duke, UNC and South Carolina. 

Now just Watkins and Hidalgo, the last 2 uncommitted prospects in the top 40.

Much needed commit for Notre Dame.  

They've had only a few commits albeit good ones over the past few years:

2023:
#16 - Cassandra PROSPER  6'2  PF
#20 - Emma RISCH  6'1  SG

2022:
#29 - KK BRANSFORD  5'10  SG  (McDAA)

2021:
#8   - Olivia MILES  5'10  PG  (McDAA)
#16 - Sonia CITRON  6'1  SF/SG  (McDAA)

2020:
#20 - Madeline WESTBELD  6'2  PF  (McDAA)
#35 - Natalija MARSHALL  6'5  PF/C

So far, their roster for next season (2023-2024 season) 
will include the above commits, plus the following transfers:

PF - Kylee WATSON  6'4     (as 4th year transfer from Oregon, #17 overall in 2020, McDAA)
PG - Jenna BROWN  5'10   (as 6th year transfer from Stanford, #18 overall in 2018, McDAA)

[joemontes]

#16 Prosper to Notre Dame, spreading the wealth a bit. She chose the Irish over Arizona, Duke, UNC and South Carolina. 

Now just Watkins and Hidalgo, the last 2 uncommitted prospects in the top 40.

Much needed commit for Notre Dame.  

They've had only a few commits albeit good ones over the past few years:

2023:
#16 - Cassandra PROSPER  6'2  PF
#20 - Emma RISCH  6'1  SG

2022:
#29 - KK BRANSFORD  5'10  SG  (McDAA)

2021:
#8   - Olivia MILES  5'10  PG  (McDAA)
#16 - Sonia CITRON  6'1  SF/SG  (McDAA)

2020:
#20 - Madeline WESTBELD  6'2  PF  (McDAA)
#35 - Natalija MARSHALL  6'5  PF/C

So far, their roster for next season (2023-2024 season) 
will include the above commits, plus the following transfers:

PF - Kylee WATSON  6'4     (as 4th year transfer from Oregon, #17 overall in 2020, McDAA)
PG - Jenna BROWN  5'10   (as 6th year transfer from Stanford, #18 overall in 2018, McDAA)

[BobK]

Hidalgo

[Tweet]https://twitter.com/hannahhidalgo/status/1591619321050304513[/tweet]

[BobK]

Hidalgo

[Tweet]https://twitter.com/hannahhidalgo/status/1591619321050304513[/tweet]

[kat0189]

Hidalgo

[Tweet]https://twitter.com/hannahhidalgo/status/1591619321050304513[/tweet]

Hopefully Prosper to Notre Dame isn't a big draw for Hidalgo. They needed Prosper bad, otherwise Hidalgo would've been pretty lonely heading there.

[kat0189]

Hidalgo

[Tweet]https://twitter.com/hannahhidalgo/status/1591619321050304513[/tweet]

Hopefully Prosper to Notre Dame isn't a big draw for Hidalgo. They needed Prosper bad, otherwise Hidalgo would've been pretty lonely heading there.

[dcnav]

My first hit on that picture was that she looks a lot like Seimone Augustus.

[dcnav]

My first hit on that picture was that she looks a lot like Seimone Augustus.

[Hoops9092]

My first hit on that picture was that she looks a lot like Seimone Augustus.

I think her game is Moriah Jefferson/Destanni Henderson-esq. 

She's a shifty, quick, small point guard with great court vision and deep range. And can pressure the ball.

[Hoops9092]

My first hit on that picture was that she looks a lot like Seimone Augustus.

I think her game is Moriah Jefferson/Destanni Henderson-esq. 

She's a shifty, quick, small point guard with great court vision and deep range. And can pressure the ball.