Posts: 6,588
Threads: 30
Joined: Oct 2016
USC was undoubtedly "flat" against Arizona. That said, Arizona played much of the game with 7 defensive backs. They basically dared USC to run, and USC mostly couldn't/didn't do so. There have been serious concerns about the USC defense all year, and this game certainly didn't put any of those to rest. Arizona scored lots of points against them. This game did however raise questions about USC's running game. It just wasn't all that effective against a team that was selling out to stop Caleb Williams. Being "flat" is one thing. That happens to "everybody". However, a top-10 team should be able to just pound away at Arizona on the ground and control the game that way until they finally "wake up". USC showed no such ability. They just aren't "that good". Given their performance at Colorado, USC had to know they weren't world-beaters. IMO it is still the typical USC where all the talent in the world ends up as (much) less than the sum of the parts.
We have undoubtedly (IMO) seen the last of DeLaura, baring something really strange happening. Noah Fifita has played better than DeLaura and has not made the mental errors DeLaura often did. You can't replace a guy that is outplaying the former starter to the extent Fifita has. Fifita is also the more QB of the future as this is DeLaura's last year. Giving Fifita experience may be an important consideration, since Arizona isn't going anywhere this year. The only problem is that Fifita is even smaller than DeLaura. How long Fifita can stay healthy might actually decide the situation, not who is the better player.