10-15-2015, 06:06 PM
Recruiting news of potentially very large proportions:
[tweet]653718213763727360[/tweet]
The staff would not invite him for an OV if he weren't enrolled in the requisite APs. Add the fact that he is in the Top 1% of his high school class, and it becomes reasonable to believe that he's an admissible candidate, if, in fact, he wants to come. Plus, he's waiting until January 2 to announce, which means he'll likely have a final decision from admissions, or at least have a very good indication of his admissions status.Â
Since 2012, Stanford has lost very few recruits who have come on an official visit and been admitted. I think you could even expand that to recruits who have come on an official visit and not been rejected or at least informed that they probably would not be admitted. I still think the entire list consists of Uriah Leaitaua (special case because of the pull of religion), Devon Allen (special case because track & field was a major factor), and Jameis Winston (special case because he's a buffoon). Any others? I would would not bet too heavily against Stanford here.Â
[tweet]653718213763727360[/tweet]
The staff would not invite him for an OV if he weren't enrolled in the requisite APs. Add the fact that he is in the Top 1% of his high school class, and it becomes reasonable to believe that he's an admissible candidate, if, in fact, he wants to come. Plus, he's waiting until January 2 to announce, which means he'll likely have a final decision from admissions, or at least have a very good indication of his admissions status.Â
Since 2012, Stanford has lost very few recruits who have come on an official visit and been admitted. I think you could even expand that to recruits who have come on an official visit and not been rejected or at least informed that they probably would not be admitted. I still think the entire list consists of Uriah Leaitaua (special case because of the pull of religion), Devon Allen (special case because track & field was a major factor), and Jameis Winston (special case because he's a buffoon). Any others? I would would not bet too heavily against Stanford here.Â
When I registered here in 2014, TrumpCard seemed like an apolitical user ID...
