06-27-2016, 02:07 PM
Based on the way the statute was written, the homeowner probably still gets a pass (depending on circumstances), under the phrasing "the person reasonably believes that the other person is: Committing or attempting to commit a burglary in a dwelling" I think even if not charged, the homeowner might have a case by saying, "I reasonably thought he was going to try to burgle my house". The fact that Wilson was charged helps a lot, since it was "reasonable" enough that the DA brought charges.
BC
BC
