[Goose]

[quote author=Goose link=topic=17356.msg200154#msg200154 date=1505138658]
[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=17356.msg200149#msg200149 date=1505133301]
Don't know if any of you have taken note of this, but Southern ןɐɔ ran the ball 48 times.  That tells you they absolutely beat Stanford at Stanford's own game.  That is a big, big problem.  They had over recent times thought they could beat Stanford by passing the ball more than running. 

Time for Shaw to evolve.  He's got to develop a much more potent passing attack.  I'll talk about this more in another post.

Well, I haven't even posted a conclusion yet.  That's why it says "I'll talk about this more in another post." 

[/quote]
[/quote]
I would say that the statement "Time for Shaw to evolve..." is clearly a conclusion deduced from your premise. I understand you intend to expand on this conclusion. What I am saying is that the need for Shaw to evolve cannot be deduced from fact that U$C ran a lot.

[Goose]

[quote author=Goose link=topic=17356.msg200154#msg200154 date=1505138658]
[quote author=OutsiderFan link=topic=17356.msg200149#msg200149 date=1505133301]
Don't know if any of you have taken note of this, but Southern ןɐɔ ran the ball 48 times.  That tells you they absolutely beat Stanford at Stanford's own game.  That is a big, big problem.  They had over recent times thought they could beat Stanford by passing the ball more than running. 

Time for Shaw to evolve.  He's got to develop a much more potent passing attack.  I'll talk about this more in another post.

Well, I haven't even posted a conclusion yet.  That's why it says "I'll talk about this more in another post." 

[/quote]
[/quote]
I would say that the statement "Time for Shaw to evolve..." is clearly a conclusion deduced from your premise. I understand you intend to expand on this conclusion. What I am saying is that the need for Shaw to evolve cannot be deduced from fact that U$C ran a lot.